Abstract
This chapter will not go into detail concerning the development of both Hong Kong and Taiwan since their separation from Imperial China under the Ching Dynasty during the nineteenth century. However, certain aspects of changes and the evolution of their significance will be touched upon to highlight the contemporary problems and conflicts surrounding both. For Hong Kong, for example, much emphasis will be placed on its evolution, the impending crisis of its return to China, the process of Sino-British negotiation since the early 1980s, the joint declaration of 1984, Hong Kong as a challenge to the People’s Republic of China (the PRC), and the Hong Kong settlement and its impact on the solution of Taiwan.
Keywords
- Chinese Communist Party
- Democratic Progressive Party
- Special Administrative Region
- National People
- Joint Declaration
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Hsing Kuo-chiang, ‘The Drafting of a Basic Law for Hong Kong’, Issues and Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, June 1986, pp. 1–4.
See also Ambrose Y. C. King, ‘The Hong Kong Talks and Hong Kong Polities’, Issues and Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, 1986, pp. 52–75.
Ibid., p. 74; and also Kuan Hsin-Chi and Lau Siu-Kai, ‘Hong Kong in Search of a Consensus’, Occasional Paper, The Centre for Hong Kong Studies, (Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, November 1985), p. 23.
Harry Harding, ‘The Future of Hong Kong’, China Business Review, vol. 12, no. 5, September–October 1985, pp. 30–7.
See I-Ching Tsou, ‘The CCP’s ‘One Country, Two Systems’, Studies in Communism, vol. 12, no. 7, 15 July, 1986, pp. 1–9. This is a negative view representing Taiwan’s position.
Sun Yun-suan, United Daily News (international edn), 12 June 1982, p. 3.
Zhang Hongzeng, ‘U.S. Taiwan Relations Act Viewed Against International Law’, in Selected Articles from Chinese Yearbook of International Law, (Beijing: China Translation & Publishing Corporation, 1983), p. 189. See also two statements made by a U.S. State Department spokesman on 6 and 10 February 1981.
Hungdah Chiu, James C. Hsiung and Ying-Mao Kau (eds.), Anthology on Reunification and Negotiation between the PRC and the ROC, 135–16, 39th Ave. (Flushing, New York: World Daily Journal, Book Division, 1982), pp. 1–4.
A. James Gregor and Maria Hsia Chang, ‘The Taiwan Independence Movement’, in Political Communication and Persuasion, vol. 2, no, 4, 1985, pp. 363–91.
Douglas Mendel, The Politics of Formosan Nationalism (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970), p. 249.
Peter Kien-hong Yu. ‘The Taipei-Washington-Peking Triangle: the Taiwan Experience as a Catalyst for China’s Reunification’, Asian Outlook, vol. 21, no. 8, August 1986, pp. 17–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 David Wen-Wei Chang
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, D.WW. (1988). ‘One Country, Two Systems’. In: China under Deng Xiaoping. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12391-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12391-9_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-55220-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12391-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)