Skip to main content
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

I very much appreciate the opportunity to respond to Jürgen Backhaus’s clever effort to bolster the Pareto principle as the fundamental concept of welfare economics and to finesse its major critiques without doing them complete justice. I find that while I agree, inevitably, with some of what he writes, I disagree with much.

Originally published in Analyse & Kritik, vol. 3 (August 1981), pp. 124–34, as a comment on Jürgen Backhaus, ‘The Pareto Principle’, Analyse & Kritik, vol. 2 (1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartlett, R. (1973) Economic Foundations of Political Power (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1966) ‘The Economics of Knowledge and the Knowledge of Economics’, American Economic Review, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (1980) Welfare, Justice, and Freedom (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. B. (1982) ‘The Necessary Normative Content of Positive Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 16, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1972) ‘The Futility of Pareto-Efficient Distributions’, American Economic Review, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 971–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1963) A Treatise on General Sociology (New York: Dover).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1971) Manual of Political Economy (eds Schwier and Page) (New York: A. M. Kelley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K. and A. T. Peacock (1975) Welfare Economics: A Liberal Restatement (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1974a) ‘An Economic Perspective on the Compensation Problem’, Wayne Law Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 113–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1974b) Pareto on Policy (New York: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1978) ‘Normative Premises in Regulatory Theory’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 100–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1980a) ‘Toward Positive Public Choice Theory’, Review of Social Economy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1980b) ‘Economics as a Science and Its Relation to Policy: The Example of Free Trade’, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 163–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. and N. Mercuro (1979) ‘The Role and Resolution of the Compensation Principle in Society: Part One — The Role’, Research in Law and Economics, vol. 1, pp. 157–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. and A. A. Schmid (1976) ‘Polluters’ Profit and Political Response: The Dynamics of Rights Creation’, Public Choice, vol. 28, pp. 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. and A. A. Schmid (1981) Law and Economics (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1981) ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science, vol. 211 (30 January), pp. 453–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 Warren J. Samuels

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Samuels, W.J. (1992). The Pareto Principle: Another View. In: Essays on the Methodology and Discourse of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12371-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics