Abstract
In his recent discussion, Robert V. Hannaford argues that we ought to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’. (‘You Ought to Derive “Ought” from “Is”’, Ethics, vol. 82 (January 1972), pp. 155-62. All page references in the text are to this article.) In this response I shall argue that whether we ought to or not, we do not and can not derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’ and that in the procedure used by Hannaford he does not derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’ but does muddy the water concerning what is involved in generating moral rules.
Originally published in Ethics, vol. 83 (January 1973), pp. 159–62.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Warren J. Samuels
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Samuels, W.J. (1992). You Cannot Derive ‘Ought’ from ‘Is’. In: Essays on the Methodology and Discourse of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12371-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12371-1_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12373-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12371-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)