Abstract
In the beginning, long before the concept of ‘maritime strategy’ was formed, there was piracy. Piracy was an endemic condition at sea which has an antiquity at least as old as does trade. Indeed modern scholarship is inclined to treat piracy as part of the general system of exchange.1 In South East Asia piracy remains an endemic problem, control of which is a major task of navies in that area.2 It is hardly a matter for surprise, therefore, that the oldest strategic motives for attack on maritime trade are derivatives of the rapacity of pirates, and that trade warfare is conducted in a complex regime of international law reflecting private and public response to the problem of piracy. From the perspective of the twentieth century, the laws of trade warfare appear primarily as restraints upon the considered actions of belligerents. Because of the underlying rapacious motive for attack on trade, however, prize law was at least as important in its function of adjudicating between privateers and naval officers on the one part, and their governors on the other. Prize law ensured that governments were able to exert some measure of control over events at sea, so that the war conducted on trade was compatible with the wider national interests, but the legal regime also prevented governments acquiring absolute control over the activities of their citizens and navies until 1856, when privateering was abolished.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Fernand Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, vol. ii, pp. 865–91, s.v. ‘Piracy: A Substitute for Declared War’. See also: B. A. Wortley, ‘Pirata Non Mutat Dominium’, British Yearbook of International Law, 1947, p. 258; C. R. Pennell, ‘Tripoli in the Late Seventeenth Century: The Economics of Corsairing in a “Sterill Country”’, Libyan Studies, 16 (1985), pp. 101–12; and ‘Piracy and Diplomacy in Seventeenth Century North Africa: The Diary of Thomas Baker, English Consul in Tripoli 1679–1685’, read in manuscript, 1985; and Alberto Tenenti, Piracy & The Decline of Venice1580–1615.
See Samuel Pyeatt Menefee, International Maritime Bureau, A Third Report Into the Incidence of Piracy and Armed Robbery from Merchant Ships, USA, October 1985; General Council of British Shipping, Guidance Notes on the Protection of Shipping against Terrorism and Sabotage, London, August 1986; and Admiral Ko, paper presented to the SIIA–NUS international conference on ‘The Security of the Sea in the Asia–Pacific Region’, 2–3 May 1985, Singapore.
Francis R. Stark, The Abolition of Privateering and the Declaration of Paris, pp. 49–57.
L. M. Hill, Bench and Bureaucracy, p. 49, and see pp. 30–53.
A. C. Bell, A History of the Blockade of Germany, 1914–18, p. 463; and James Wilford Garner, Prize Law During the World War, section 126.
Richard H. Cox, Locke on War and Peace, pp. 7–44 and 136–46.
William V. O’Brien, The Conduct of the Just and Limited War, chs. 1 and 2.
C. J. Ford, ‘Piracy or Policy: the Crisis in the Channel, 1400–1403’, Royal Historical Society Transactions, 1979, p. 63.
Hugo Grotius, The Rights of War and Peace, A. C. Campbell (ed.); and De Jure Belli Ac Paris, (Francis W. Kelsey translation, Introduction by James Brown Scott).
J. W. Garner, op. cit., p. 201.
See CAB 21/307, ‘The Law of Prize in Relation to the Dominions’, draft, circa 1926.
R. W. Tucker, The Laws of War and Neutrality at Sea, pp. 3–10.
D. P. O’Connell, The Influence of Law on Seapower, p. 3.
Kenneth Raymond Andrews, Elizabethan Privateering, pp. 22–31, s.v., ‘Regulation’; and Robert W. Kenney, Elizabeth’s Admiral, pp. 33–87.
See C. H. Firth and R. S. Rait, Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum1642–1660, vol. II, p. 66.
William arid Mary 4–5, 1692. The text of this act does not agree with the information given in Kemp, vide infra.
Peter Kemp, Prize Money, and The Oxford Companion to Ships and the Sea, s.v., ‘Prize Money’; and Carl E. Swanson, ‘Predators and Prizes: Privateering in the British Colonies During the War of 1739–1748’, PhD, University of Western Ontario, pp. 31–56.
Carlton Savage, Policy of the United States Toward Maritime Commerce in War, vol. i, p. iii.
See Timothy J. Runyan, ‘Merchantmen to Men-on-War in Medieval England’, in New Aspects of Naval History, Craig L. Symonds (ed.), pp. 33–40.
David J. Starkey, ‘British Privateering, 1702–1783, with particular reference to London’, University of Exeter PhD, 1985, p. 366, Table 87, et passim. See also Richard Pares, Colonial Blockade and Neutral Rights, 1739–1763, p. 18.
Jonathan Swift, Political Tracts1711–1713, Herbert Davis (ed.), s.v., ‘The Conduct of the Allies’, November 1711, p. 22.
Kenneth Raymond Andrews, Elizabethan Privateers, pp. 3–21, s.v., ‘Privateering and the Sea War’, and pp. 222–40, ‘The Consequences of Privateering’.
Carl E. Swanson, loc. cit., pp. 3–11, 166–185, 300–4, 320.
James G. Lydon, ‘Privateering becomes a Business: New York in Mid-Eighteenth Century’, in Commission Internationale d’Histoire Maritime. Course et Piraterie.
David Starkey, ‘British Privateering Against the Dutch in the American Revolutionary War, 1780–1783’, in Studies in British Privateering, Trading Enterprise and Seamen’s Welfare, 1775–1900, Stephen Fisher (ed.), pp. 1–18; and ‘British Privateering, 1702–1783’, pp. 362–5.
Patrick Crowhurst, The Defence of British Trade1689–1815, s.v., ‘French Privateering and British Trade 1689–1815’; and ‘Bayonne Privateering 1744–1763’, in Commission Internationale d’Histoire Maritime. Course et Piraterie.
John S. Bromley, ‘The Loan of French Naval Vessels to Privateering Enterprises, 1688–1713’, in Corsairs and Navies, 1660–1760, pp. 187–212.
Patrick Crowhurst, op. cit., p. 495.
Carl E. Swanson, loc. cit., p. 320.
John B. Hattendorf, England in the War of the Spanish Succession, ms pp. 235–43, Garland Press, 1987.
David John Starkey, ‘British Privateering, 1702–1783’, pp. 95–6, 243, and passim.
Alberto Tenenti, Piracy and the Decline of Venice1580–1615, pp. 128–30.
Christopher Lloyd, Lord Cochrane, p. 100. See also John S. Bromley, ‘The Profits of Naval Command, Captain Joseph Taylor and his Prizes’, in Corsairs and Navies, 1660–1760, pp. 449–62.
‘The only award now payable under the Naval Prize Act, 1864, is for prize salvage for the recapture of British property in war’. England, Queen’s Regulations for the Royal Navy, Chapter 51, 5101 para 2.
See ADM 116/1319, 1320B and 1715, subject files on distribution of Prize Money and Prize Bounty, 1914–18 war.
Patricia Crimmin, ‘The Royal Navy and the Levant Trade, c.1795–c.1805’, in Jeremy Black and Philip Woodfine (eds), The British Navy and the Use of Naval Power in the Eighteenth Century, pp. 221–36.
Colin Elliott, ‘Some Transactions of a Dartmouth Privateer During the French Wars at the End of the Eighteenth Century’, in Studies in British Privateering, Trading Enterprise and Seamen’s Welfare, 1775–1900, Stephen Fisher (ed.), pp. 19–40.
J. W. Garner, Prize Law During the World War, pp. 8 and 195–9.
John Francis Guilmartin, op. cit., p. 156.
Calendar of State Papers, Venice, vol. 8, no. 40.
James A. Williamson, Hawkins of Plymouth, pp. 317–22.
See Agnes M. C. Latham, Sir Walter Raleigh.
State Papers Domestic, Elizabeth, CCLIX, no. 12.
Ibid., CCLIII, no. 70.
Ibid., CCLXIII, no. 102.
Kenneth Raymond Andrews, op. cit., pp. 187–95.
See R. B. Merriman, The Rise of the Spanish Empire, vol. iv, pp. 207, 436; J. A. Williamson, Hawkins of Plymouth, p. 159; Sir Walter Raleigh, Three Discourses of Sir Walter Raleigh, and M. Oppenheim (ed.), The Naval Tracts of Sir William Monson, vol. i, p. 46.
Quoted in Sir Herbert Richmond, op. cit., p. 291.
Henry Kamen, ‘The Destruction of the Spanish Silver Fleet at Vigo in 1702’, Bulletin of The Institute of Historical Research, vol. XXXIX (1966), pp. 165–73.
Jonathan Swift, Political Tracts1711–1713, Herbert Davis (ed.), s.v., ‘The Conduct of the Allies’, November 1711, p. 22.
An Enquiry into the Reasons of the Conduct of Great Britain with Regard to the Present State of Affairs in Europe, Dublin, 1727 (quoted in Sir Herbert Richmond, The Navy as an Instrument of Policy, p. 397).
Alice Clare Carter, Neutrality or Commitment, pp. 53–8. See also N. Laude, La Compagnie d’Ostende et son activité coloniale au Bengale 1725–30.
J. M. Wallace-Hadrill, The Barbarian West, s.v., ‘Mare Nostrum’.
Philip C. Jessup and Francis Deak, op. cit., pp. 54 and see pp. 50–103 s.v., ‘Contraband of War’.
Ibid., p. 44.
Ibid., p. 56.
Ibid., p. 58.
Philip C. Jessup and Francis Deak, Neutrality, its History, Economics and Law, vol. i, p. 61.
D. J. Llewelyn Davies, ‘Enemy Property and Ultimate Destination During the Anglo–Dutch Wars 1664–7 and 1672–4’, British Yearbook of International Law, 1931, p. 21.
Carl J. Kulsrud, op. cit., pp. 244–94.
G. N. Clark, The Dutch Alliance and the War Against French Trade, p. 108; and Carl J. Kulsrud, op. cit., pp. 206–16.
Article 17 of the Commercial Treaty.
G. N. Clark, ‘Neutral Commerce in the War of the Spanish Succession and the Treaty of Utrecht’, British Yearbook of International Law, 1928, p. 69.
See Sir Herbert Richmond, The Navy as an Instrument of Policy, pp. 50–60.
R. G. Albion, Forests and Sea Power, ch. v.
See W. R. Mayer, ‘English Privateering in the War of 1688 to 1697’, The Mariners Mirror, vol. 67 (1981), no. 3, p. 259.
G. N. Clark, op. cit., pp. 32, and 65–9.
Sir Herbert Richmond, The Navy as an Instrument of Policy, pp. 301–10, 319–20; see also John B. Hattendorf, op. cit., ms., pp. 208–35; and John Ehrman, The Navy in the War of William III 1689–1697, pp. 517–18.
David Aldridge, ‘Swedish Privateering, 1710–1718 and the Reactions of Great Britain and the United Provinces’, in Commission Internationale d’Histoire Maritime. Course et Piraterie.
James Pritchard, Louis XV’s Navy 1748–1762, A Study of Organization and Administration, p. 183.
James S. Pritchard, ‘The Pattern of French Colonial Shipping to Canada before 1760’, Revue Française d’Histoire d’Outre-Mer, vol. 63, no. 231, 1976.
P. W. Bamford, Forests and French Sea Power, 1660–1789, pp. 65–6.
Robert Greenhalgh Albion, Sea Lanes in Wartime, pp. 34–64; O. W. Stephenson, ‘The Supply of Gunpower in 1776’, American Historical Review, XXX, pp. 271–81, 1925; and Nicholas Tracy, Navies, Deterrence and American Independence, pp. 118–58.
David Syrett, Shipping and the American War, 1775–83, A Study of British Transport Organization, pp. 243–8. See also R. Arthur Bowler, Logistics and the Failure of the British Army in America, 1775–1783.
Quoted in G. N. Clark, op. cit., p. 90.
Eli F. Heckscher, Mercantilism, vol. ii, p. 29. See Robert Livingston Schuyler, Fall of the Old Colonial System.
James Frederick Chance (ed.), British Diplomatic Instructions, 1689–1789, vol. i (Sweden), pp. 50 at 52. Quoted in Jessup and Deak, op. cit., p. 118.
See Carl J. Kulsrud, op. cit., pp. 202–43.
Jonathan I. Israel, ‘A Conflict of Empire: Spain and the Netherlands 1618–1648’, Past and Present, Aug. 1977; and The Dutch Republic and the Hispanic World, 1606–1661, passim. See also N. G. Parker, The Army of Flanders and the Spanish Road, 1567–1659.
See James F. McNulty, ‘Blockade: Evolution and Expectation’, United States Naval War College International Law Studies Vol. 62, The Use of Force, Human Rights and General International Legal Issues, p. 172.
T. S. Bindoff, The Scheit Question, passim.
Charles R. Boxer, The Dutch Seaborne Empire1600–1800, pp. 84–112.
Quoted in Geoffrey Till, Maritime Strategy in the Nuclear Age, p. 150.
See Sir Herbert Richmond, op. cit., p. 116.
Ralph Davis, The Rise of the English Shipping Industry, pp. 12–15.
State Papers, Venice, vol. 34, nos. 379 and 398.
W. J. Ecles, Canada under Louis XIV, 1663–1701, chs 4 and 5. See also Paul Waiden Bamford, Trench Shipping in Northern European Trade, 1660–1789’, The Journal of Modern History, vol. 26, pp. 201–19 (1954).
Alice Clare Carter, Neutrality or Commitment: The Evaluation of Dutch Foreign Policy, 1667–1795, pp. 14–15; and Ralph Davis, op. cit., pp. 224–5.
Ralph Davis, ‘English Foreign Trade, 1660–1700’, in The Growth of English Overseas Trade, and Ec H R, 2nd Series, VI (1954).
Carl Marie von Clausewitz, On War (Paret & Howard edn), p. 605.
Quoted in R. Pares, Colonial Blockade, p. 172.
Alice Clare Carter, op. cit.
Geoffrey Symcox, The Crisis of French Sea Power 1688–1697, pp. 177–87. Marshal Vauban, Mémoire sur la Caprerie, 30 Nov. 1695, in Rochas d’Aiglun, Vauban. Sa Famille et ses écrits. Ses oisivets et sa correspondance: analyse et extracts, vol. i, 454–61.
Geoffrey Sumcox, op. cit, pp. 187–220.
G. N. Clark, op. cit., p. 127.
J. A. Johnson, ‘Parliament and the Protection of Trade 1689–1694’, The Mariners Mirror, Vol. 57, 1971, pp. 399–413.
Ralph Davis, The Rise of the English Shipping Industry, p. 316; and Sir H. W. Richmond, op. cit., pp. 237–46.
See W. R. Mayer, loc. cit.
Geoffrey Symcox, op. cit., pp. 187–220.
G.N. Clark, op. cit., p. 139.
Ralph Davis, op. cit., p. 317; and J. S. Bromley, ‘The French Privateering War, 1702–13’, in: Historical Essays 1600–1750 presented to David Ogg.
Jonathan Swift, Political Tracts 1711–1713, Herbert Davis (ed.), s.v., ‘The Conduct of the Allies’ November 1711, p. 22.
Patrick Crowhurst, The Defence of British Trade1689–1815, s.v., ‘Marine Insurance’. See also A. H. John, ‘The London Assurance Company and the Marine Insurance Market of the Eighteenth Century’, Economica, XXV (1958) pp. 126–41.
The symbiotic relationship amongst the insurance, shipping, and privateering businesses is parallel to what appears to have been the symbiosis between Latin Christian traders and corsairs in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. John Pryor suggests that the former were able to capture from Moslem and Byzantine merchants the lion’s share of the long-distance trades of the Mediterranean because geography favoured the predatory activities of Christian raiders. John H. Pryor, Geography, technology, and war. Studies in the maritime history of the Mediterranean, 649–1571, p. 162.
George Louis Beer, British Colonial Policy, 1754–1765, pp. 72–131.
R. Pares, War and Trade in the West Indies1739–63, p. 351.
Lucy S. Sutherland, A London Merchant, 1695–1774; passim.
C. P. Crowhurst, ‘The Admiralty and the Convoy System in the Seven Years War’, The Mariners Mirror, Vol. 57 (1971), pp. 163–73.
Ralph Davis, op. cit., pp. 317–18. See C. Wright and C. E. Fayle, History of Lloyds, p. 156.
Michael Howard, War and the Liberal Conscience, p. 24.
Richard D. Bourland Jr., ‘Maurepas and his Administration of the French Navy on the Eve of the War of the Austrian Succession (1737–1742)’, PhD, pp. 146 and 434–5. See Chanoine Victor Verlaque, Histoire du Cardinal de Fleury et de son Administration, p. 132.
Carl E. Swanson, loc. cit., pp. 275–6.
James C. Riley, The Seven Years War and the Old Regime in France, The Economic and Financial Toll, pp. 104–7, 111, 114–17, 128–9.
Pp. 319–20.
R. Pares, War and Trade, p. 390.
See Nicholas Tracy, Navies, Deterrence and American Independence, pp. 2–4, 14–22 and passim, and Piers Mackesy, The War for America, 1775–1783, passim.
See Daniel A. Baugh, British Naval Administration in the Age of Walpole, s.v., ‘Cash and Debt’, pp. 470–81; and J. A. Johnson, loc. cit.
See Nicholas Tracy, Manila Ransomed, forthcoming.
Ralph Davis, ‘English Foreign Trade, 1700–1774’, The Growth of English Overseas Trade in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, and Ec HR Second Series XV (1962).
A. H. John, ‘War and the English Economy, 1700–1763’, The Economic History Review, VII (1954–55), pp. 329–44.
Ralph Davis, loc. cit.
James C. Riley, op. cit., p. 192. See also François Crouzet, review of Riley’s work in English Historical Review, October 1988, pp. 987–90.
Carl J. Kulsrud, op. cit., pp. 107–55.
Ibid., pp. 61–106.
Alice Clare Carter, op. cit., pp. 85–9. See also her ‘How to revise treaties without negotiating: common sense, mutual fears and the Anglo–Dutch trade disputes of 1759’, in Studies in Diplomatic History, 1970; and The Dutch Republic in Europe in the Seven Years War, pp. 84–128. See also Francis R. Stark, op. cit., pp. 72–5.
O. H. Mootham, ‘The Doctrine of Continuous Voyage, 1756–1815’, British Yearbook of International Law, 1927, p. 62.
Public Record Office, London, State Papers 94/175, no. 26, 26 Sept. 1766.
O. W. Stephenson, ‘The Supply of Gunpowder in 1776’, American Historical Review, XXX, pp. 271–81, 1925.
David Starkey, loc. cit.
Gaston Martin, ‘Commercial Relations between Nantes and the American Colonies during the War of Independence’, Journal of Economic and Business History, IV (1932), pp. 812–29.
Quoted in R. Pares, Colonial Blockade, p. 172.
Public Record Office, London, State Papers 84/561, no. 6; Suffolk to Yorke.
Alice Clare Carter, op. cit., pp. 97–106.
Isabela de Madariaga, Britain, Russia and the Armed Neutrality of 1780, pp. 377–86; Alice Clare Carter, op. cit., pp. 97–103; and Bernard Semmel, Liberalism and Naval Strategy, pp. 14–20.
Robert Livingston Schuyler, The Fall of the Old Colonial System, Introduction and ch 1.
E. F. Heckscher, The Continental System, p. 61.
Alexander De Conde, The Quasi-War, passim.; James Scott Brown (ed.), The Controversy Over Neutral Rights Between the United States and France, 1797–1800, A Collection of American State Papers and Judicial Decisions, passim; W. Alison Phillips, op. cit., pp. 86–90; Anna Cornelia Clauder, American Commerce as Affected By the Wars of the French Revoultion and Napoleon, 1793–1812, pp. 38–47; and Robert Greenhalgh Albion, op. cit., pp. 78–85.
A. N. Ryan, ‘The Defence of British Trade with the Baltic, 1808–1813’, English Historical Review, 74 (1959), p. 443.
C. Ernest Fayle, ‘Shipowning and Marine Insurance’, The Trade Winds. See also Charles Wright and C. Ernest Fayle, A History of Lloyds.
W. Freeman Gilpin, The Grain Supply of England During the Napoleonic Period, pp. viii, 13, 20, 23, 31, 45, 80, 85, 94, 108, 145, 194, and Mancur Olson, Jr., The Economics of the Wartime Shortage, pp. 49–72.
Geoffrey Ellis, Napoleon’s Continental Blockade, pp. 1–26.
Eli F. Heckscher, op. cit., pp. 41 and 205; and W. Allison Phillips, op. cit., pp. 158–66.
A. N. Ryan, ‘Trade with the Enemy in the Scandinavian and Baltic Ports during the Napoleonic War: for and against’; Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, V series, vol. 12 (1962), p. 123.
Carlton Savage, Policy of the United States Toward Maritime Commerce in War, vol. i, document 56, p. 279.
House of Lords, 28 February 1812, Hansard XXI, p. 1053 (quoted in Heckscher, p. 120).
W. Alison Phillips and Arthur H. Reede, Neutrality, ii, ‘The Napoleonic Period’, pp. 91–125; Anna Cornelia Clauder, American Commerce as Affected by the Wars of the French Revolution and Napoleon, 1793–1812, pp. 27–38; and Robert Greenhalgh Albion with Jennie Barnes Pope, Sea Lanes in Wartime, p. 75.
W. Allison Phillips, op. cit., pp. 119–25; Anna Cornelia Clauder, op. cit., pp. 67–119 and 134; and Robert Greenhalgh Albion, op. cit., pp. 85–94.
Ibid., pp. 105–9; Louis Martin Sears, Jefferson and the Embargo, passim; Walter Wilson Jennings, The American Embargo, 1807–1809, pp. 70–93; and W. F. Gilpin, ‘The American Grain Trade to the Spanish Peninsula 1810–14’, American Historical Review, XXVIII, pp. 22–44, 1922.
See Richard Glover, The French Fleet, 1807–1814; Britain’s Problem; and Madison’s Opportunity’, The Journal of Modern History, vol. 33, pp. 407–22 (1961); and Bernard Semmel, op. cit., pp. 26–30.
Quoted in Albion, op. cit., p. 116.
W. F. Gilpin, loc. cit.
A. T. Mahan, Sea Power in its Relations to the War of1812, p. 184.
Carlton Savage, Policy of the United States Toward Maritime Commerce in War, vol. i, document 60, p. 287.
W. K. Hancock and M. M. Gowing, British War Economy, p. 4.
See John M. Sherwig, Guineas and Gunpowder, British Foreign Aid in the Wars with France 1793–1815, passim.
Geoffrey Ellis, op. cit., ch. 6.
François Crouzet, ‘Wars, Blockade, and Economic Change in Europe, 1792–1815’, Journal of Economic History, 24, pp. 567–88, 1964.
Francis R. Stark, op. cit., pp. 19–22.
Carlton Savage, op. cit., vol. i, pp. 42–54.
Bernard Semmel, op. cit., pp. 31–50.
‘An Essay on the Influence of a Low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stock, etc’; see William D. Grampp, The Manchester School of Economics, p. 23.
Robert Livingston Schuyler, The Fall of the Old Colonial System, ch. 5.
Olive Anderson, ‘Economic Warfare in the Crimean War’, Economic History Review XIV (1961), pp. 34–47; Sir Francis Piggott, The Declaration of Paris 1856; and Warren F. Spencer, ‘The Mason Memorandum and the Diplomatie Origins of The Declaration of Paris’, in Nancy N. Barker and Marvin L. Brown, Diplomacy in An Age of Nationalism, The Hague, 1971.
W. H. Malkin, ‘The Inner History of the Declaration of Paris’, British Yearbook of International Law, 1927, pp. 1–44.
C. I. Hamilton, Anglo–French Seapower and the Declaration of Paris’, The International History Review, vol. iv, no. 1, Feb. 1982, pp. 166–90.
Carlton Savage, op. cit., vol. i, p. 68.
Sir Francis Piggott, op. cit.
C. I. Hamilton, loc. cit.
‘The War Policy of Commerce’, quoted in Piggott, op. cit., p. 110.
Olive Anderson, A Liberal State at War, pp. 261–8.
Ibid., p. 274.
W. H. Malkin, loc. cit., and D. Schindler and J. Toman (eds), The Laws of Armed Conflicts, no. 56.
Francis R. Stark, op. cit., pp. 156–9.
W. H. Malkin, loc. cit.
Quoted in Sir Francis Piggott, op. cit., p. 126.
C. H. Stockton, ‘Would Immunity from Capture, During War, of Non-Offending Private Property Upon the High Seas be in the Interest of Civilization?’, The American Journal of International Law, 1 (1907), p. 930.
Bernard Semmel, op. cit., pp. 56–66.
Hansard, 6 March 1871, p. 1364; quoted by Sir Herbert Richmond, Sea Power in the Modern World, pp. 63–8.
Sir Francis Piggott, op. cit.
C. I. Hamilton, loc. cit.
M. R. Pitt, ‘Great Britain and Belligerent Maritime Rights from the Declaration of Paris, 1856, to the Declaration of London, 1909’, University of London PhD, 1964.
Jacob W. Kipp, ‘Russian Naval Reforms and Imperial Expansion, 1856–1863’, in Soviet Armed Forces Review, vol. 1 (1977), p. 118; and John E. Jessup, ‘Alliance or Deterrence: The Case of the Russian Fleet Visit to America’, in Craig L. Symonds (ed.), New Aspects of Naval History, pp. 238–52. See also Norman A. Graebner, loc. cit.
Sir Herbert W. Richmond, Imperial Defence and Capture at Sea in War, pp. 260–1; and see Richmond, Economy and Naval Security, pp. 61–72, s.v., ‘Defence Against Investment (b) In the Form of Sporadic Attack’, London, 1931.
See J. I. de Lanessan, Le Programme Maritime de 1900–1906 (Paris, 1905), quoted by Geoffrey Till, Maritime Strategy and the Nuclear Age, p. 155.
Ephraim Douglass Adams, Great Britain and the American Civil War, pp. 137–71.
George Dalzell, The Flight From the Flag, pp. 237–48; Frank J. Merli, ‘The Confederate Navy, 1861–1865’, in Kenneth J. Hagan (ed.), In Peace and War, and Robert Greenhalgh Albion, op. cit., pp. 168–70.
F. L. Owsley, King Cotton Diplomacy, pp. 1–50.
Ibid., pp. 134–42.
Philip S. Foner, British Labour and The American Civil War, pp. 4–5, 11–24 et passim.
Carlton Savage, op. cit., pp. 87–97.
Stuart L. Bernath, Squall Across the Atlantic, pp. 33–62.
Norman A. Graebner, ‘Northern Diplomacy and European Neutrality’, in Why the North Won the Civil War, David Donald (ed.); Stuart L. Bernath, op. cit., passim; Dudley W. Knox, A History of the United States Navy, chs 25 and 26; and Frank J. Merli, op. cit., pp. 235–49.
Alfred Thayer Mahan, From Sail to Steam, ‘Incidents of War and Blockade Service’, pp. 156–95.
David Donald, ‘Died of Democracy’; Richard N. Current, ‘God and the Strongest Battalions’; T. Harry Williams, ‘The Military Leadership of North and South’; and David M. Potter, ‘Jefferson Davis and the Political Factors in Confederate Defeat’, all in Why the North Won the Civil War.
Stanley Lebergott, ‘Through the Blockade: The Profitability and Extent of Cotton Smuggling, 1861–1865’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 41, pp. 867–88, 1981; and see Marcus Price, ‘Ships that Tested the Blockade ...’, The American Neptune, vols 8 (pp. 196–241), 11 (pp. 262–90) and 15 (pp. 97–132).
F. L. Owsley, op. cit., pp. 261–2 and 266–7. See pp. 229–67 passim.
L. H. Johnson, ‘Commerce between Northeastern ports and the Confederacy’, Journal of American History, vol. 54, pp. 30–42, 1967.
Frank E. Vadiver, Confederate Blockade Running Through Bermuda1851–1865, Letters and Cargo Manifests, p. xli.
F. L. Owsley, op. cit., p. 267.
A. J. Marder, The Anatomy of British Sea Power: a history of British Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era, 1880–1905, pp. 84–105; and Brian Ranft, ‘Restraints on War at Sea before 1945’, in Michael Howard (ed.), Restraints on War.
Theodore Ropp (ed. by Stephen S. Roberts), The Development of a Modern Navy, French Naval Policy 1871–1904; pp. 162–80, 206–15; and Donald M. Schurman, The Education of a Navy, ch. 2.
Archibald Hurd, The Merchant Navy, vol. I, p. 210.
A. T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, pp. 138 and 209.
Geoffrey Symcox, ‘Admiral Mahan, the Jeune Ecole, and the Guerre de Course’, in Commission Internationale d’Histoire Maritime. Course et Piraterie.
Archibald Hurd, op. cit., pp. 212 and 218.
Mancur Olson, op. cit., pp. 74–5.
Georg Schwarzenburger and E. A. Brown, A Manual of International Law, 6th edn, pp. 109 and 150.
See Albert E. Hogan, Pacific Blockade, passim; and Neil H. Alford, Naval War College International Law Studies, 1963, Modern Economic Warfare (Law and the Naval Participant), Washington, 1967; s.v., ‘Pacific Blockade’, pp. 273–79.
Quoted in Albert E. Hogan, op. cit., p. 124.
Thomas F. Power Jr., Jules Ferry and the Renaissance of French Imperialism, p. 172, s.v., ‘Undeclared War with China’, et seq.; A. Thomazi, La Conquête de L’Indochine, s.v., ‘La Guerra Navale (1884–1885)’. See also Ralph A. Leitner Jr., ‘International Considerations in the French Blockade of Formosa (1884–1885)’, PhD, 1979.
See Holger H. Herwig, Germany’s Vision of Empire in Venezuela, 1871–1914, passim.
E. B. Parsons, ‘German–American Crisis of 1902–1903’, The Historian, vol. 33, pp. 436–52, May 1971; P. S. Holbo, ‘Perilous Obscurity: Public Diplomacy and the Press in the Venezuelan Crisis, 1902–1903’, The Historian, vol. 32, pp. 428–48, May 1970; Ronald Spector, ‘Roosevelt, the Navy and the Venezuelan Controversy: 1902–1903’, The American Neptune, 32 (Oct. 1972), pp. 257–63; and Holger H. Herwig, op. cit., pp. 205–7, 220–35.
See C. J. Bartlett, Great Britain and Sea Power, p. 87.
James Cable, Gunboat Diplomacy, Political Applications of Limited Naval Force, pp. 20 and 39–40.
Albert Hogan, op. cit., p. 3.
Leon Friedman (ed.), The Law of War, vol. ii, p. 298.
Carlton Savage, op. cit., Document 152, p. 494.
Carlton Savage, op. cit., p. 106.
A. C. Bell, op. cit., p. 9; see also CAB 21/307. Memorandum by Sir C. Hurst on Sir Maurice Hankey’s Paper on ‘Blockade and the Laws of War’, 16 November 1927.
G. P. Gooch and H. Temperley (eds), British Documents on the Origins of the War, iii, pp. 402–3, and viii, p. 392.
M. R. Pitt, loc. cit., p. 447.
Ibid., pp. 295–371.
Bernard Semmel, op. cit., pp. 154–8.
See Marion C. Siney, The Allied Blockade of Germany1914–1916, p. 8.
See Brian Ranft, ‘The Protection of British Seaborne Trade and the Development of Systematic Planning for War, 1860–1906’, in Technical Change and British Naval Policy.
Bernard Semmel, op. cit., p. 94.
ADM 116/1079 and 1087, International Naval Conference held in London, 1908–9, papers relating to the preparation of Britain’s position, and cmd 4554 and 4555, March 1909, Correspondence and Proceedings. See the official communiqué, general report, and final protocol in United States Naval War College International Law Topics; The Declaration of London of February 26, 1909, Washington, 1910; James Brown Scott (ed.), The Declaration of London February 26, 1909, A Collection of Official Papers ...; C. H. Stockton, ‘The International Naval Conference of London, 1908–1909’, The American Journal of International Law, 3 (1909), p. 596; Marion C. Siney, op. cit., pp. 8–13; and see Dietrich Schindler and Jiri Toman (eds), The Laws of Armed Conflicts, 64, Naval Conference of London, 1909.
The Nineteenth Century, June 1907 (and reprinted in Admiral A. T. Mahan (ed.)), Some Neglected Aspects of War, Boston, 1907. See Donald M. Schurman, Julian S. Corbett, 1854–1922, pp. 26 and 71.
Donald M. Schurman, op. cit., s.v., Corbett. Sir Julian S. Corbett, Some Principles of Maritime Strategy, pp. 235–65.
Quoted in CAB 21/307 Memorandum by Sir M. Hankey on Blockade and the Laws of War, 31 October 1927.
Louis Guichard, The Naval Blockade 1914–1918, p. 19; and Bernard Semmel, op. cit., pp. 89–119.
ADM 116/1236, Secret, The Declaration of London from the point of view of war with Germany, MPA Hankey, Naval Assistant Secretary CID, 15 February 1911, and Remarks by Sir Charles Ottley on Captain Hankey’s Paper, 17 February 1911. See also Marion C. Siney, op. cit., pp. 8–13.
Bernard Semmel, op. cit., p. 114.
Quoted in CAB 21/307, loc. cit. See also Lord Hankey, The Supreme Command, i, pp. 94–101.
Quoted in A. J. Marder, From the Dreadnaught to Scapa Flow: the Royal Navy in the Fisher Era, 1904–19, vol. i, p. 36.
Archibald Hurd, op. cit., p. 225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 John Nicholas Tracy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tracy, N. (1991). The Development of Strategic Purposes for Attack on Maritime Trade. In: Attack on Maritime Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12303-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12303-2_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12305-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12303-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)