Skip to main content

Díaz Ordaz and the Student Massacre at Tlatelolco

  • Chapter
The Presidency in Mexican Politics

Part of the book series: St Antony’s ((STANTS))

Abstract

In the eyes of most historians the Tlatelolco massacre of 2 October 1968, when scores (perhaps hundreds) of unarmed student demonstrators in a central square of Mexico City were shot dead by the military, was the central act of the Díaz Ordaz presidency. It was central both in terms of the numbers of dead, the symbolism of the location and the international publicity given to the event, and also in the (retrospectively) apparently predictable nature of the Díaz Ordaz government’s response. This response, aside from its barbarism, was a classic demonstration of the power of the Mexican presidency. It led to a considerable reappraisal of the nature of the Mexican system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, the shift in perspective between (on the one hand) Robert Scott Mexican Government in Transition (University of Illinois, 1964) and P. Gonzalez Casanova Democracy in Mexico (Oxford University Press, 1970, first published in Spanish with ERA; 1965) and, on the other, R.D. Hanson The Politics of Mexican Development (Johns Hopkins, 1974) and S.K. Purcell The Mexican Profit-Sharing Decision: Policymaking in an Authoritarian Regime (University of California, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Cal y Arena, Pensar en 1968; E. Stevens’ Protest and Response in Mexico (MIT, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Zermeno, México: Una Democracia Utopica: El Movimiento estudantil en 1968 (Siglo XXI, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Scherer, Los Presidentes (Grijabo, 1986);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jose Cabrera Parra, Díaz Ordaz y el 68 (Grijabo, 1980);

    Google Scholar 

  6. and J.A. Hellman, Mexico in Crisis (2nd edn, Holmes & Meier, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Loaeza, Classes Medics y La Politica en Mexico (Colegio de Mexico, 1988) p.324.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gunther, Inside Latin America (Hamish Hamilton, 1942) p.46. For a more scholarly account of the Avila Camacho fiefdom see W. Pansters ‘Paradoxes of Regional Power’ in W. Pansters and A. Onweed, Regions, State and Capitalism in Mexico. ( Cedla: Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Cosio Villegas, La Sucesion Presidencial (Joaquin Mortiz, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Michaels, ‘The Crisis of Cardenismo’, Journal of Latin American Studies. vol. 2, part 1 (May 1970). D. Cosio Villegas, La Sucesion Presidencial.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Aguila Camín, Despues del Milagro (Cal y Arena, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Roxborough, Unions and Politics in Mexico (Cambridge University Press, 1984); E. Stevens, Protest and Response in Mexico;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Alonso El Movimiento Ferrocarrilero en México 1958–68 (Era, 1972). See also the British Foreign Office file FCO 371, AM 218.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See D. Mares, Penetrating the International Market: Theoretical Considerations and a Mexican Case Study (Columbia University Press, 1987) and S. Sanderson Agrarian Populism and the Mexican State: the case of Sonora. (University of California, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Morley, Imperial State and Revolution. (Cambridge University Press, 1987). However the British Embassy believed that López Mateos was seriously embarrassed when Cárdenas shared a platform with Castro in Havana on 26 July 1959. On 16 October 1959 Ambassador Noble wrote that “President López Mateos is known to be annoyed and seriously angry with Cardenas” as a result of the latter’s continuing support for Castro. (Noble to Lloyd, AM 1015/11).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Lajous, La Contienda Presidencial 1988: Los Candidatos y Sus Partidos ( Diana, Mexico, 1988) pp. 56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loaeza, Clases Medias and A. Alvarado, ed., Electoral Patterns and Perspectives in Mexico (University of San Diego, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Reyes del Campillo, El Frente Electoral del Pueblo y el Partido Comunista Mexicano (1963–64), Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, July/September 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Zepeda ‘Los caudillos en Michoacán; Fransisco J. Mugica y Lazaro Cardenas’ in C. Martinez Assad Estadistas, Caciques y Caudillos (UNAM, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Agee, Inside the Company: a CIA Diary ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975). p. 532.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tad Szulc, Fidel: a critical portrait (Coronet, 1989) p.395.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Studies include Sanderson, Agrarian Populism; T. Ugalde, Power and Conflict in a Mexican Community (University of New Mexico, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carlos Loret de Mola, Confesiones de Un Gobernador (Grijabo, 1978); and J. Gledhill in Bulletin of Latin American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. M. Assad and A. Areola, ‘El Poder de los Gobernadores’ in S. Loaeza and R. Segovia, La Vida Politica Mexicana en la crisis (Colegio de Mexico, 1987) p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The classic account of this process is in P. Smith Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth Century Mexico (University of Princeton, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See, for example, E. Marquez, ‘Political Anachronisms: The Navista Movement and Political Processes in San Luis Potosi 1958–85’, in A. Alvarez, ed., Electoral Patterns and Perspectives in Mexico;

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Bezdek, ‘Electoral Opposition in San Luis Potosi; the Case of Nava’, in K.F. Johnson, Mexican Democracy: a critical view (3rd edn, Praeger, 1984) and C.M. Assad, in Loaeza and Segovia, La Vida Politica.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Escalante, The State and Henequen Production in Yucatán 1955–1980. ( Occasional Paper, Inst. of Latin American Studies, London, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  29. For discussion of this notion see John Bailey, Governing Mexico: the statecraft of crisis management (Macmillan, 1988) pp. 107–11; Gonzalez Casanova, Democracy in Mexico; Ugalde, Power and Conflict.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Cox, ‘The Partido Accion Nacional’ (Mimeo, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Carpizo, El Poder Presidencial (Siglo XXI, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Memo by Wallace Stuart, ‘The Popular Socialist Party and Vicente Lombardo Toledano’, 8 May 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.A. Camp, The Making of a Government: Political Leaders in Mexico (University of Arizona, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Cleaves, Professions and the State (University of Arizona, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 George Philip

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Philip, G. (1992). Díaz Ordaz and the Student Massacre at Tlatelolco. In: The Presidency in Mexican Politics. St Antony’s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12192-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12192-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12194-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12192-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics