Skip to main content

Preliminary Screening

  • Chapter
Both Sides of Selection
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

When the advertisement is placed, you will not know whether or not you will need to shortlist. It is wise to plan for it, and to identify your selection panel as the best people to do it. You will, at the very least, find a second opinion helpful, and despite the current general management ethos, you may want to encourage corporate ownership of the decision. If you go solo and show bias, you may be called to task for flouting equal opportunity policies, or upsetting the consultant whose support is vital.

Study the past if you would divine the future.

Confucius, Analects

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Cowan, N and Cowan, R, ‘Are references worth the paper they’re written on?’, Personnel Management, December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Martin Edis and Nursing Times

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edis, M. (1990). Preliminary Screening. In: Both Sides of Selection. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12095-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12095-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-54239-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12095-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics