Skip to main content

Language and Dialogue

  • Chapter
Judaism and World Religion

Part of the book series: Library of Philosophy and Religion ((LPR))

  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

I recall a conference, held under the auspices of the World Congress of Faiths, at which representatives of several of the world’s major religious communities addressed the audience on the ‘problems, possibilities and challenges encountered through the use of language and symbolism in dialogue between the great religions of the world’. I presented the viewpoint of the ‘committed, orthodox Jew’. All of us who participated drew on the traditional sources of our faiths — in my case the Bible, the Talmud and the writings of the rabbis — and with diligence and ingenuity cited apt texts in support of our views. Yet we soon discovered that the language we were using was only in part the language of our traditions. If we had not also been articulate in modern English (certainly not the principal language of any of our traditions) we should not have been able to communicate with our audience or with one another. Evidently, the organisers had invited only fluent English-speakers to lecture. Had they realised the full implications of this practical necessity?

The first version of this chapter appeared as ‘The Language of Dialogue in World Religions’ in World Faiths Insight (London), 1987.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning 7th edn (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1945) supplement i.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William Downes, Language and Society (London: Fontana, 1984) p. 337;

    Google Scholar 

  3. see the whole of ch. 11. The philosophical concept of ‘speech acts’ was elaborated by John R. Searle in his seminal paper ‘What is a Speech Act?’ in Max Black (ed.), Philosophy in America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1965) pp. 221–39. Searle’s main concern, however, is with the intentionality of verbal speech acts.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Hymes, in J. Gumpertz and D. Hymes, Directions in Sociolinguistics (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972); cited in Downes Language and Society p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. E. M. Anscombe, Intention (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, William James Lectures (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953) p. 43. Of course, before Quine was born Ferdinand de Saussure had already made clear that language units can only be defined in relation to other units within the system; but neither he nor his structuralist followers made the correct philosophical inferences.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hubert L. Dreyfus, What Computers Can’t Do (New York: Harper and Row, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. John R. Searle, Minds, Brains and Science, Reith Lectures (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paul M. Churchland, A Neuro-computational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Klenicki and G. Wigoder (eds), A Dictionary of the Jewish-Christian Dialogue (Ramsay, NJ: Stimulus Foundation, Paulist Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Compare Paul F. Knitter, No Other Name? (London: SCM Press, 1985) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moses Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed, Shlomo Pines, 2 vols (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. M. Colby, Artificial Paranoia (New York. Pergamon Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jerry A. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983). On input and language systems see esp. p. 47ff. On central systems see p. 101ff.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Stich, ‘Beliefs and Subdoxastic States’, Philosophy of Science XLV (1973) 499–518. See Fodor, The Modularity of Mind p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Norman Solomon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solomon, N. (1991). Language and Dialogue. In: Judaism and World Religion. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12069-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics