Nationalism in Europe: Trends and Threats

  • Carlo Maria Santoro

Abstract

The new centrality of Europe and especially of Germany seems to have resulted from the rapid breakdown of the ‘Eastern subsystem’, or rather the composite Soviet empire that contributed in 1945 to the marginalisation of the old continent and to the bipolar division of the world.

Keywords

Entropy Economic Crisis Europe Assure Lime 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Not by chance, even the book by Paul Johnson (A History of the Modern World from 1917 to the 1980s, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    It is true that between the two world wars (1919–39) the phenomenon of ‘de-Europization’ of the international system seemed to have stopped. Nevertheless, the balance of power mechanism, which had functioned so harmoniously for almost three centuries between 1648 and 1914, began to show its age early on. See Edward V. Gulick, Europe’s Classical Balance of Power (Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967)Google Scholar
  3. Edward H. Carr, The 20 Years Crisis: 1919–1939 (London: Macmillan, 1978).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    See Norman Rich, Hitler’s War Aims (New York: Norton, 1973)Google Scholar
  5. Andreas Hillgruber, Hitler’s Strategic (Munich: Bernard & Graefe, 1986)Google Scholar
  6. Robert E. Herzstein, When Nazi Dreams Come True (London: Abacus, 1982).Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    The concept of Mitteleuropa has undergone many changes not only in geographic breadth of the defined area, but also in the interpretation of the role of the Central empires, and of Germany in particular. ‘Almost all tend to at least comprise the area between the Rhine basin to the West, the Danube to the South, and the Vistula to the East. But there are also those definitions that include Burgundy, the Vosges regions, Italy, Dalmatia, Flanders, Denmark, and the Scandinavian countries.’ See Henry C. Meyer, Mitteleuropa in German Thought and Action, 1815–1945 (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacques Droz, L’Europe Centrale: Evolution historique de l’idée de ‘Mitteleuropa’ (Paris: Payot, 1960).Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    David A. Baldwin, ‘Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies’, World Politics, vol. 31 (1970), pp. 161–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    See the essay by Nancy Kanwisher, ‘Cognitive Heuristic and American Security Policy’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 33 (1989) pp. 652–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    George Liska, Nations in Alliance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
  12. Glenn H. Snyder, ‘The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics’, World Politics, vol. 31 (1984) pp. 461–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliances, (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    Jack S. Levy, War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495–1975, (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983)Google Scholar
  15. Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Random House, 1987)Google Scholar
  16. George Modelski and William R. Thompson, Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joshua S. Goldstein, Long Cycles, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    On the number of essential actors in the various systems, see the pioneering work by Morton A. Kaplan, System and Process in International Politics (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1957).Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    For a definition, see Carlo Maria Santoro, Il sistema di guerra (Milan: F. Angeli, 1988).Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    See D. P. Rapkin, W. R. Thompson, J. A. Christopherson, ‘Bipolarity and Bipolarization in the Cold War Era: Conceptualization, Measurement and Validation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 23 (1979) pp. 261–95).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 14.
    Michael W. Doyle, Empires (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986) pp. 123–38.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    Karl W. Deutsch, The Analysis of International Relations (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1978).Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    See Karl Popper, The Poverty of Historicism, (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957).Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    George Mosse, Masses and Men (New York: Fertig, 1980).Google Scholar
  25. 18.
    See Carles Tilly (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  26. 20.
    Harold D. Lasswell and Abraham Kaplan, Power and Society (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950).Google Scholar
  27. J. David Singer, ‘Inter-Nation Influence: A Formal Model’, American Political Science Review, vol. 57, (1963) pp. 420–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jan F. Triska (Ed.), Dominant Powers and Subordinate States (Durham: Duke University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  29. 22.
    Hélène Carrère d’Encausse, L’empire éclaté (Paris: Flammarion, 1978)Google Scholar
  30. Viktor Zaslavsky, ‘Gorbachev’s Perestroika and Soviet Nationality Policy’, Quadern Papers, no. 16 (Milan: ISPI, 1989)Google Scholar
  31. 23.
    Consider Italy in the Mediterranean as an example of this need. See Carlo Maria Santoro (1990), L’anfibio tricolore, ovvero la politica ester a di una Media Potenza, (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
  32. 24.
    The major theories on nationalism include the’ strong’ ones based on the idea that nationalism is the expression of the nation, and the ‘weak’ ones which, one way or another, connect it to the concept of national identity. See Anthony D. Smith, Theories of Nationalism (New York: Harper Row, 1971).Google Scholar
  33. 25.
    John Breuilly, Nationalism and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983) p. 302.Google Scholar
  34. 27.
    G. H. N. Seton-Watson, Nations and States (London: Methuen, 1977).Google Scholar
  35. 28.
    Anthony D. Smith, The Ethnic Revival, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
  36. 32.
    A. L. Epstein, Ethos and Identity (London: Tavistock, 1978)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seweryn Bialer, Stalin’s Successors (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980) p. 207.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    On the ideal link between Russian nationalism and Soviet Bolshevism, see Mikhail Agursky, The Third Rome: National Bolshevism in the USSR (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987)Google Scholar
  39. Alexander Yanov, The Russian New Right (Berkeley: California University Press, 1978) pp. 29–30Google Scholar
  40. John B. Dunlop, The Faces of Contemporary Russian Nationalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    Mark N. Katz, ‘The Decline of Soviet Power’, Survival, vol. 32 (1990) pp. 15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Graham H. Turbiville Jr, ‘Restructuring the Soviet Ground Forces’, Military Review, vol. 69, (1989) pp. 17–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© László Valki 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Maria Santoro

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations