Abstract
The distinction between ‘traditional’ and ‘modern(ising)’ society implies a sharp break. Behind it shelters a series of subordinate but equally value-laden oppositions: myths versus history, ritual versus science, rural versus urban, metaphor versus literality. Yet these are tropological distinctions in their own right.2 They imply radically divergent understandings of time and event, and of the economy of knowledge. In these terms, the representation of current and past events becomes an important dimension of field research, much neglected in societies with a long-established, official or canonical history. The question that emerges is less whether ‘traditional societies’ participate in ‘our’ concepts of time,3 than whether any society can claim to have achieved the purely literal understanding of the past that scientific definitions of temporality presuppose.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herzfeld, M. (1992). History in the Making: National and International Politics in a Rural Cretan Community. In: de Pina-Cabral, J., Campbell, J. (eds) Europe Observed. St Antony’s / Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11990-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11990-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11992-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11990-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)