Skip to main content

Abstract

Until 1935, the primary significance of the Mediterranean in Britain’s global strategy was that it provided the shortest route to the Empire in the Far East. The commitment to the Far East was not only intrinsic, but served also as a guarantee to defend the Australian and New Zealand Dominions against the Japanese menace. The Italian conquest of Abyssinia in 1935 shattered this strategic conception, raised the spectre of hostilities with Italy in the Mediterranean, or a land attack against Egypt. It also exposed Britain’s inability to defend the widely-scattered components of her colonial Empire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 Michael J. Cohen and Martin Kolinsky

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, M.J., Kolinsky, M. (1992). Conclusion. In: Britain and the Middle East in the 1930s. Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11880-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11880-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-53514-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11880-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics