Abstract
Before addressing the issue whether, as Djilas has stated, the Soviet system itself is now in crisis or, in Gorbachev’s own words, at least in ‘pre-crisis’, a methodological problem has to be tackled: Is Sovietology affected by glasnost’ and, if so, to what extent? Perhaps one might ask even whether Sovietology is ‘in crisis’. Here it is instructive to note the nature of the Soviet data that are more readily available of late; after all, a veritable stream of material, sometimes consisting of mutually contradictory items, is emanating now from Soviet publications — official, semi-official and non-official. While this development is highly desirable, of course, it carries with it a certain price as far as scholarship is concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Uri Ra’anan and Igor Lukes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ra’anan, U. (1990). Is Sovietology in Crisis? Concepts and Methods of Analysis. In: Ra’anan, U., Lukes, I. (eds) Gorbachev’s USSR. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11705-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11705-5_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11707-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11705-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)