Skip to main content

Public Choice and Agriculture: An American Example

  • Chapter
Issues in Contemporary Economics

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

In the United States, agricultural politics were very much in the news in 1989. There were the intense negotiations in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT); the $40+ billion appropriations bill for the nation’s farm and food programmes; the $900 million farmer reimbursement package for crop losses due to drought, floods — all have kept the agricultural situation in the forefront of the communications media. Because of this and other related events, a paper on ‘public choice and agriculture’ appears very appropriate at this time. We shall first examine the theory then proceed to examples which appear to substantiate the general thesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blandford, D., de Gorter, H. and Harvey, D. (1988) ‘Production Entitlement Guarantees (PEGs): A Minimally Distorting Method of Farm In come Support’, paper prepared for the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium Symposium Bringing Agriculture into the GATT (Annapolis, Maryland, 18–19 August).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist, 8 July 1989 (London) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERS (1984a) ‘Rice: Background for 1985 Farm Legislation’, USDA Agricultural Information Bulletin, no. 470 (Washington, DC) (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • ERS (1984b) ‘Sugar: Background for 1985 Farm Legislation’, USDA Agricultural Information Bulletin, no. 478 (Washington, DC) (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. (1981) The Governing of Agriculture (Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press) p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Heemi, K. and Lardinois, P. (1985) Agricultural Policy and Trade (New York: New York University Press) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, M. M. (1967) ‘The Water is-different Syndrome, or What is Wrong with the Water Industry?’, paper presented to the American Water Re sources Association, San Francisco (3 November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. E., Ingram, H. and Laney, N. K. (1982) ‘A Willingness to Play: Analysis of Water Resources Development’, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E. (1989) ‘Large Costs and Small Benefits of the American Sugar Programme’, The World Economy, vol. 12, no. 1 (March) pp. 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987) Autocracy (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A. (1989) ‘Big Sugar’, The New Yorker (17 and 24 July).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tullock, G., Hillman, J. (1991). Public Choice and Agriculture: An American Example. In: Dasgupta, P. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Economics. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11579-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics