Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cambridge Commonwealth Series ((CAMCOM))

  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

For the Malay people, the fall of Malacca in 1511 was a catastrophe from which they still suffer today. As Raffles noted in 1823:1

The European policy which first destroyed the independence of their most respectable states and subsequently appropriated to itself the whole trade of the Archipelago, left them without the means of honest subsistence, while by the extreme severity of its tortures and punishment, it drove them to a state of desperation. Thus piracy became honourable, and that devotion which on another occasion would have been called a virtue became a crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. de V. Allen, A J Stockwell and L. R. Wright, eds, A Collection of Treaties and Other Documents affecting the States of Malaysia 1761–1963, Oceana, 1981, vol I, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbara Watson Andaya and Leonard Y. Andaya, A History of Malaysia, London 1982, p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sheridan and Groves, The Constitution of Malaysia, 4th ed 1987, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tun Suffian Hashim, An Introduction to the Constitution of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 1972, 2nd ed., p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. F. Rawlings, ‘The Malaysian Constitutional Crisis of 1983’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(2), April 1986, pp 237–254;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. J. Stockwell, ‘Princes and Politicians: ‘The Constitutional Crisis in Malaysia, 1983–84’, in D. A. Low ed., Constitutional Heads and Political Crises, Commonwealth Episodes, 1945–85. London, 1988, pp. 182–197.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. H. Kersley, Broom’s Legal Maxims, 10th ed., 1939, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jennings, Cabinet Government, 3rd ed., Cambridge 1959, pp. 337, 352.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Justice Per Abu Mansor in Abdul Ghapur bin Haji Salleh v Tun Datuk Haji Mohamed Adnan Robert and Others [1987], 2 MLJ 724 and 731. The reference was to dissolution of the Sabah Legislative Assembly. ‘If I am right in holding that the act of dissolution is a Legislative act,’ added the judge, ‘in no way can the Court intervene’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 David Butler and D. A. Low

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hickling, H. (1991). Malaysia. In: Butler, D., Low, D.A. (eds) Sovereigns and Surrogates. Cambridge Commonwealth Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11565-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics