Skip to main content

The New Concept of Planning: Duality with Market Forces

  • Chapter
Market Forces in Planned Economies

Abstract

Nearly thirty years ago Jan Drewnowski, in a seminal, but neglected, paper ‘The Economic Theory of Socialism: A Suggestion for Reconsideration’ (1961) proposed the division of any monetised economy into ‘the zone in which state preferences are supreme (the zone of state influence), the zone in which individual preferences are supreme (the zone of individual influence) and the zone in which state and individual preferences meet (the zone of dual influence). To determine which part of the national economy belongs to which zone means to define the nature of the economic system in question’ (p. 350). He pointed out that historical cases have existed where one of the two preference functions has been virtually exclusive of the other — Soviet ‘War Communism’ of the 1920s or the capitalism of a century ago — and that shifting the boundaries between them and with the intervening preference zone is constrained by property rights.

At the time of the conference I was Alexander von Humboldt Fellow at the University of Munich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Backhouse, R. E. (1980) ‘Fix-price versus Flex-price Models of Macroeconomic Equilibrium with Rationing’, Oxford Economic Papers, 2, pp. 210–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. and Grossman, H. (1971) ‘A General Disequilibrium Model of Income and Employment’, American Economic Review (March) pp. 89-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. and Grossman, H. (1974)’ suppressed Inflation and the Supply Multiplier’, Review of Economic Studies, pp. 87-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvish, T. and Kahana, N. (1989) ‘The Ratchet Principle: A Multi-period Flexible Incentive Scheme’, European Economic Review (January) pp. 51-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J. (1961) ‘The Economic Theory of Socialism: A Suggestion for Reconsideration’, Journal of Political Economy (August) pp. 341-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B. C. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1988) ‘Examining Alternative Macroeconomic Theories’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 207–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. (1968) Money and Plan (Berkeley Calif.: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Hans (1961) Quantity Planning and Price Planning in the Soviet Union (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaser, M. C. (1979) ‘La politique du taux de change dans le pays membres de la Banque Internationale de coopération économique’, Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest (December) pp. 159-76. The English original (presented to a conference in Aix-en-Provence in 1979) was circulated as Papers in East European Economics, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaser, M. C. (1987) ‘“One Economy, Two Systems”: Parallels between Soviet and Chinese Reform’, International Affairs (Summer) pp. 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaser, M. C. (1988) ‘Reform in the USSR and China’, Pacific Review 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsenelenboigen, A. (1977) ‘Coloured Markets in the USSR’, Soviet Studies, 1, pp. 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1981) The Economics of Shortage, 2 vols (Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissanke, M. (1979) ‘The Disequilibrium Model in a Controlled Economy’, American Economic Review (September) pp. 726-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R. and Winter, D. (1978) ‘The Demand for Money and for Consumption Goods in Centrally-planned Economies’, Review of Economics and Statistics (February) pp. 8-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R. and Winter, D. (1987) ‘Macroeconomic Planning and Disequilibrium, Estimates for Poland 1955–80’, Econometrica (January) pp. 19-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R., Quant, R. and Yeo, S. (1988) ‘Tests of the Chronic Shortage Hypothesis: The Case of Poland’, Review of Economics and Statistics (May) pp. 288-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, F. L. (1963) The Communist Foreign Trade System (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, S. (1965) Forced Labour and Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, L. (1988) ‘CMEA in 2000’, The Nordic Journal of Soviet and East European Studies, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaba, L. (1989) ‘The Recent Past and Future of the Hungarian Reform; An Overview and Assessment’, in Wallace, W. and Clarke, R. (eds) The Hungarian Reform: The Second Decade (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1984) ‘Bureaucratic and Market Coordination’, Osteuropa-Wirtschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winiecki, J. (1988) Economic Prospects in East and West (London: CRCE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, T. (1988) ‘The Simultaneity of Effects of a Devaluation: Implications for Modified Planned Economies’, Acta Oeconomica, 31 (3-4).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Oleg T. Bogomolov

Copyright information

© 1990 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaser, M., Vojnić, D., Csaba, L. (1990). The New Concept of Planning: Duality with Market Forces. In: Bogomolov, O.T. (eds) Market Forces in Planned Economies. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11559-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics