Abstract
Ricardo believed that the solution to the problem of relative shares was the principal desideratum in economics;1 yet, he clearly developed only the antipodal movements of the wage and profit shares in the product-after-rent.2 He was much less explicit about the proportional distribution of total output between rent, on the one hand, and wages plus profits, on the other.
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, XXV (2), May 1959. The author is grateful to David Horlacher for several helpful comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cannan, E. (1967) 1st pub. 1924) History of the Theories of Production and Distribution, (New York: A. M. Kelly).
Carlson, S. (1956) Pure Theory of Production, (New York: Kelly & Hillman).
Meier, G. M. and Baldwin, R. E. (1957) Economic Development, Theory, History, Policy, (New York: Wiley).
Robinson, J. (1954) The Economics of Imperfect Competition, (London: Macmillan).
Sraffa, P. (ed.) (1953) The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Weintraub, S. (1958) An Approach to the Theory of Income Distribution, (Philadelphia: Chilton Publishing).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1991 Paul Davidson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davidson, P. (1991). A Clarification of the Ricardian Rent Share. In: Davidson, L. (eds) Inflation, Open Economies and Resources. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11516-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11516-7_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11518-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11516-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)