Skip to main content

The Demand and Supply of Securities and Economic Growth and Its Implications for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Versus Samuelson-Modigliani Controversy

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Keynesian revolution is usually thought to have begun with The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (Klein, 1966, p. ix; Harrod, 1951, p. 462). According to Keynes’s biographer, however, The General Theory emerges from Keynes’s attempt to simplify the intricate analysis of his Treatise on Money (Harrod, 1951, p. 437). It is the Treatise (hereafter referred to as TM) rather than The General Theory (hereafter GT) which is Keynes’s ‘most mature work’, ‘the work of a lifetime’, and the one where the student will ‘get the best picture of his [Keynes’s] total contribution to economics’ (ibid., p. 403).

This article appeared in the American Economic Review (1968). The author is grateful to M. Fleming, E. Smolensky and S. Weintraub for comments on an earlier draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brechling, F. P. R. (1957), ‘A Note on Bond-holding and the Liquidity Preference Theory of Interest’, Revue of Economic Studies, pp. 190–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1965), ‘Keynes’s Finance Motive’, Oxford Economic Papers, (March), pp. 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1967), ‘The Importance of the Demand for Finance’, Oxford Economic Papers, (July), pp. 245–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1968), ‘Money, Portfolio Balance, Capital Accumulation, and Economic Growth’, Econometrica, (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. and E. Smolensky (1964a), Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis, (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. and E. Smolensky (1964b), ‘Modigliani on the Interaction of Real and Monetary Phenomena’, Revue of Economics and Statistics, (November), pp. 429–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. F. (1951), The Life of John Maynard Keynes, (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. F. (1963), ‘Themes in Dynamic Theory’, Economic Journal, (September), pp. 401–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1954), ‘Alternative Theories of Distribution’, Revue of Economic Studies, pp. 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1960), ‘Speculation and Economic Stability’, Revue of Economic Studies, 1939, reprinted in Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, (1960). All references are to the reprinted essay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1966), ‘Marginal Productivity and the Macroeconomic Theories of Distribution’, Revue of Economic Studies, pp. 309–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1930), A Treatise on Money, (London, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, (New York, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1937a), ‘Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest’, Economic Journal, (June), pp. 241–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1937b), ‘The Ex-ante Theory of the Rate of Interest’, Economic Journal, (December), pp. 663–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. R. (1966), The Keynesian Revolution, 2nd edn (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, B. (1937), ‘Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Savings and Investment II’, Economic Journal, (June), pp. 221–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1962), ‘Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth’, Revue of Economic Studies, 1962, pp. 267–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. H. (1938), ‘Mr Keynes and “Finance”’, Economic Journal, (June), pp. 314–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. H. (1956), Economic Commentaries, (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1951), Collected Economic Papers, Vol. I (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1963), Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1964a), Economics, 6th edn (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1964b), ‘A Brief Survey of Post Keynesian Developments’, in Keynes’s General Theory Reports of Three Decades, ed. by R. Lekachman (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. and F. Modigliani (1966), ‘The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models’, Revue of Economic Studies, (October), pp. 269–302 and ‘Reply to Pasinetti and Robinson’, pp. 321–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, R. (1960), Interest Rates and Asset Prices, (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, S. (1958), An Approach to the Theory of Income Distribution, (Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Louise Davidson

Copyright information

© 1990 Paul Davidson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, L. (1990). The Demand and Supply of Securities and Economic Growth and Its Implications for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Versus Samuelson-Modigliani Controversy. In: Davidson, L. (eds) Money and Employment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11513-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics