Abstract
It is often argued that certain fundamental differences between Keynes and the neoclassics derive from different implicit assumptions about relative speeds of adjustment of prices and quantities in response to changes in demand. Indeed, Leijonhufvud has asserted that ‘The “revolutionary” elements in The General Theory can perhaps not be stated in simpler terms’ (1968, p. 52). Moreover, certain issues currently in dispute among monetarists and between monetarists and Keynesians appear to turn on much the same issue. For example, Friedman and Patinkin have quarrelled over whether Fisher and the quantity theorists ‘simply took over Marshall’s assumption [that] prices adjust more rapidly than quantities’ (Friedman, 1972, pp. 933–4; also Patinkin, 1972, pp. 892–7). Friedman insists that Fisher and all other quantity theorists must adopt Marshall’s assumption, which Friedman describes as follows:
prices adjust more rapidly than quantities, indeed, so rapidly that the price adjustment can be regarded as instantaneous. An increase in demand (a shift to the right of the long-run demand curve) will produce a new market equilibrium involving a higher price but the same quantity. The higher price will, in the short run, encourage existing producers to produce more with their existing plants … it takes time for output to adjust but no time for prices to do so. (Friedman, 1972, p. 934)
Previously published in Economic Enquiry, 12 (June 1974) pp. 146–58. I am grateful to Paul Wells.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchian, A. (1959), ‘Cost and Output’, in M. Abromavitz et al,., The Allocation of Resources, (California).
Allen, R. G. D. (1956), Mathematical Economics, (London).
Brunner, E. K. and A. H. Meltzer (1972), ‘Money, Debt, and Economic Activity’, Journal of Political Economics, 80 (September-October), pp. 951–77.
Bushaw, D. and R. W. Clower (1957), An Introduction to Mathematical Econ-omics, (Homewood).
Clower, R. W. (1954), ‘An Investigation into the Dynamics of Investment’, American Economics Review, 44 (March), pp. 64–81.
Friedman, M. (1970), ‘A Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, 78 (March-April) pp. 193–238.
Friedman, M. (1972), ‘Comments on the Critics’, Journal of Political Economy, 80 (September-October), pp. 906–50.
Kaldor, N. (1939), ‘Speculation and Economic Growth’, Revue of Economic Studies,; reprinted in Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, (London, 1960). All references are to the reprint.
Kaldor, N. (1972), ‘The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics’, Economic Journal, 82 (December), pp. 1237–55.
Keynes, J. M. (1930), Treatise on Money, Vol. II (London).
Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, (London).
Leijonhufvud, A. (1968), Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, (London).
Leijonhufvud, A. (1974), ‘Keynes’ Employment Function: Comment’, History of Political Economics.,
Patinkin, D. (1972), ‘Friedman on the Quantity Theory and Keynesian Economics’, Journal of Political Economics, 80 (September-October), pp. 883–905.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1990 Paul Davidson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davidson, L. (1990). Disequilibrium Market Adjustment: Marshall Revisited. In: Davidson, L. (eds) Money and Employment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11513-6_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11513-6_35
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11515-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11513-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)