Skip to main content

The Rhetoric of the Commonplace: Argumentation and Ideology (Jules Verne and Emile Zola)

  • Chapter
Towards A Definition of Topos
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

The domain of the topos and of related notions such as ‘commonplace’ and ‘cliché’ is marked by a lack of definitional precision. This can in part be explained in terms of the centuries-old tradition of rhetoric; the successive periods of its history mean that it is now perceived as a ‘vast synchrony’ (Barthes). Within that synchrony we find, however, that ‘topos’ and ‘place’ are used in very disparate acceptations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Lausberg, Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (Munich, 1960), p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Barthes, ‘L’Ancienne Rhétorique’, Communications, 16 (1970), p. 206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Barthes, ‘L’Ancienne Rhétorique’, Communications, 16 (1970), p. 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H.F. Plett, Einführung in die rhetorische Textanalyse (Hamburg, 1973), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Jehn (ed.), Toposforschung. Eine Dokumentation (Frankfurt, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Amossy and E. Rosen, Les Discours du cliché (Paris, 1982 ), pp. 143, 140.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Amossy and E. Rosen, Les Discours du cliché (Paris, 1982 ), p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Barthes, ‘L’Ancienne Rhétorique’, Communications, 16 (1970), p. 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.P. Richard, Paysages et Figures. In: Critique, no. 374, May 1978, p. 441.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Grange, ‘La Dialectique récit/discours dans la stratégie de la persuasion’, in Stratégies discursives (Lyon, 1978), p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hence the great interest of Compagnon’s (1979) study of quotation. See A. Compagnon, La Seconde Main, ou le travail de la citation (Paris, 1979) and Nous, Michel de Montaigne (Paris, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Meyer, Logique, langage et argumentation (Paris, 1982), p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Gelas, ‘La Fiction manipulatrice’, in L’Argumentation (Lyon, 1981), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.A. Screech, The Rabelaisian Marriage (London, 1958 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See G. Bennington’s study, Sententiousness and the Novel (Cambridge, 1985 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Wierenga, ‘“Ses jambes d’insecte” Aspects rhétoriques d’un mécanisme de généralisation’, CRIN (1988), p. 36–64.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Bremond, ‘Le Rôle d’influenceur’, Communications 16, 60–9 (1970), p. 60 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Sutton, ‘The Death of Rhetoric’, Rhetorica, vol. 4, no. 3. (1986), p. 224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Lambert Wierenga

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wierenga, L. (1991). The Rhetoric of the Commonplace: Argumentation and Ideology (Jules Verne and Emile Zola). In: Hunter, L. (eds) Towards A Definition of Topos. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11502-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics