Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s ((STANTS))

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

Pakistan has managed to maintain a position relative to India which has never completely reflected its deficiencies in size and resources. This has been related largely to Pakistan’s strategic location, and to its effective diplomacy, mainly vis-à-vis the USA, China, and regional including Middle East countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Shirin Tahir Kheli, The US and Pakistan: The Evolution of an Influence Relationship (New York: Praeger, 1982), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Spector, Nuclear Proliferation Today, A Carnegie Endowment Book (New York: Vintage Books, 1984), p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See S. Weissman and H. Krosney, The Islamic Bomb (New York: New York Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Z. Khalilzad, ‘Pakistan’s nuclear program’, Asian Survey, vol. XVI, no. 6 (June 1976), pp. 580–92, also by the same auther, ‘Pakistan and the bomb, Survival (November–December 1979), vol. XXI, no. 6, pp. 244–50, and M. A. Khan, ‘Nuclear energy and international co-operation’, The Rockefeller Foundation/RIIA Working Paper (September 1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See for example Z. Khalilzad, ‘Pakistan’, in J. Goldblat (ed.), Non-proliferation: The Why and the Wherefore, SIPRI (London: Taylor & Francis, 1985), pp. 131–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On this issue see W. C. Potter, Nuclear Power and Proliferation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Cambridge, MA: Oelgescehlager, Gunn and Haim, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See T. Cobb in R. W. Jones (ed.), Small Nuclear Forces and US Security Policy (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a scholarly analysis of Carter’s non-proliferation policy see M. Brenner, Nuclear power and Non-proliferation: The Remaking of US Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. For background on China’s approach to South Asia and nuclear proliferation see W. Bamds, ‘The impact of the Sino-Soviet dispute on South Asia’, in H. Ellison (ed.), The Sino-Soviet Conflict (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Vertzberger, The Enduring Entente: Sino-Pakistani Relations, 1960–80 (New York: Praeger, 1983); and R. P. Cronin, ‘Prospect for non-proliferation in South Asia’, The Middle East Journal (Autumn 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For further discussion see R. Sutter, ‘The strategic consequences of nuclear proliferation in South Asia for China’, in N. Joeck (ed.), Strategic Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation in South Asia (London: Frank Cass Publishing, 1986), pp. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z. A. Bhutto, If I Am Assassinated (New Delhi: Vikas, 1979), p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For more detail see Spector, Nuclear Proliferation Today, chapter III, pp. 149–65; D. K. Palit and P. K. S. Namboodiri, Pakistan’s Islamic Bomb (New Delhi: Vikas, 1979), pp. 62–65; Tahir Kheli, The US and Pakistan: The Evolution of an Influence Relationship, p. 89; and Weissman and Krosney, The Islamic Bomb.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Ziba Moshaver

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moshaver, Z. (1991). Pakistan’s Choice: Nuclear Option vs. Nuclear Weapons. In: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation in the Indian Subcontinent. St Antony’s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11471-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics