Abstract
In a way it is not unproductive to attempt a plot summary of Bad Timing since its reductive failure to come near to what one experiences as a spectator reveals the importance of its construction to interpretation. For this is simply the story of a love affair that follows its course from first meeting to terrible parting. The history of the relationship is unfolded as the lovers’minds turn back upon their recent past, and the police investigate the events of their last night together, suspecting a crime has been committed. However, such an account leaves out more than information about their changing relationship, its main deficiencies being that it ignores the points of view from which the lovers’history is recovered, and has nothing to say about the fracturing of time across their seemingly random recollections. It is the very dispersal of point of view across the main characters which makes the reconstruction of the events of the narrative productive since in their recollections and insights they themselves have, like the audience, to experience a replay of the relationship. The act of witnessing offers the characters the potential for self discovery — a potential which at least one of them exploits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Alessandra Comini, Gustav Klimt (London: Thames & Hudson, 1981) pp.5–6.
Peter Vergo, Art in Vienna, 1898–1918 (London: Phaidon, 1975) p.15.
Teresa de Lauretis, ‘Now and Nowhere: Roeg’s Bad Timing’, in Mary Ann Doane, Patricia Mellencamp and Linda Williams (eds.), Re-vision: Essays in Feminist Film Criticism (Los Angeles: American Film Institute, 1984) p.155.
The kingfisher (which Milena wears as a brooch) corresponds in some mythologies to Prometheus. It played a key role after the great flood, when surviving humans were freezing wet, by flying up to the Creator, stealing fire from him, and bringing it to the world. For this, in some versions of the story, the bird was rewarded with its colour. (Sir James George Frazer, Folk-Lore in the Old Testament (London: Macmillan & Co., 1918) Vol. 1, p.233
Joseph Campbell, The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology (New York: Viking Press, 1969) p.278.)
John Pym, ‘Ungratified Desire: Nicolas Roeg’s Bad Timing’, Sight & Sound 49 (Spring 1980) p.111.
Jan Dawson, ‘Bad Timing’, Cinema Papers 28 (Aug–Sep 1980) p.227.
The butterfly takes this meaning because of the transformations of its life cycle. In Christian imagery it symbolises the Resurrection. The eagle has the same connotation. See George Ferguson, Signs and Symbols in Christian Art (London: Oxford University Press, 1974) pp.13, 17.
William Blake, A Selection of Poems (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958) p.64.
C. G. Jung, Two Essays On Analytical Psychology, The Collected Works, Vol. 7, 2nd edn (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981) p.53.
Jung, Axon, The Collected Works, Vol. 9, 2, 2nd edn (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968) p.21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Kenneth John Izod
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Izod, J. (1992). Bad Timing. In: The Films of Nicolas Roeg. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11468-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11468-9_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11470-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11468-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)