Skip to main content

The Man Who Fell To Earth

  • Chapter
The Films of Nicolas Roeg
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

Some months before The Man Who Fell To Earth was released, its scriptwriter Paul Mayersberg described its variegated structure as being episodic and fragmentary, like a circus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Paul Mayersberg, ‘The Story So Far... The Man Who Fell To Earth’, Sight & Sound 44 (Summer 1975) p.231.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonathan Rosenbaum, ‘The Man Who Fell To Earth’, Monthly Film Bulletin 43 (April 1976) p.86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. G. Jung, ‘Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies’, Civilization in Transition, The Collected Works, Vol. 10 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964) pp.307–433.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Hall, Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art (London: John Murray, 1974) pp.168–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Howard Daniel, Encyclopaedia of Themes and Subjects in Painting (London: Thames and Hudson, 1971) p.135.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joseph Campbell, The Hero With A Thousand Faces, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968) pp.35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Sir James George Frazer, The Golden Bough, Part III, The Dying God (London: Macmillan, 1923) pp.14–58

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. G. Jung, Symbols of Transformation, The Collected Works, Vol. 5, 2nd edn (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956) pp.177–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tom Milne, ‘The Man Who Fell To Earth’, Sight & Sound 45 (Summer 1976), p.146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The title’ stardust’also alludes to David Bowie’s stage persona Ziggy Stardust. His performance as Newton recalls space travellers in songs released between Space Oddity (1968) and Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars (1972), when the personae in his songs were of extraordinary diversity. They included benign figures (‘Oh You Pretty Things’,’ starman’) and malign (‘Ziggy Stardust’); tragic (’soul Love’, ‘Five Years’) and comic (‘Andy Warhol’); heterosexual (‘Kooks’) and homosexual (‘Lady Stardust’, ‘Queen Bitch’). He projected emotionally powerful visions from the heroism of the modern odyssey (’space Oddity’) to the diabolism of amateur Nazism (‘The Bewlay Brothers’). The rapidity of change during this part of Bowie’s career (‘Changes’) projected him as a figure akin to the alchemists’ Mercurius. Jung analyses this figure, sometimes represented as both male and female, as consisting of all conceivable opposites, being both material and spiritual, and representing the process by which the lower and material is transformed into the higher and spiritual, and vice versa (C G Jung, Alchemical Studies, The Collected Works, Vol. 13 (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967) p.237).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 Kenneth John Izod

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Izod, J. (1992). The Man Who Fell To Earth. In: The Films of Nicolas Roeg. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11468-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics