Skip to main content

The USSR, 1918–45

  • Chapter
Modern Times

Part of the book series: Man & Music ((MAMU))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

An aesthetic reaction against the carnage of World War I was a common phenomenon in much of postwar Europe. In Russia it was not so much the war itself that came to capture the imagination of postwar artists, but the revolutionary toppling of the autocratic government in February 1917 and, most significantly, the unexpected seizure of power, in October that year, by Lenin and his Bolshevik Party in the name of the working class.1 Beyond the broad notion that ‘art belongs to the people’2 and the conviction that artistic culture could and should play an important role in the building of the first socialist state, the revolutionaries had no firm understanding of what that might entail. That ‘Soviet’ art would somehow be as new and unprecedented as the socialist workers’ paradise was a matter of faith. Whether the workers should be creators of the new art or its consumers, whether art should build on the traditions of the bourgeois past or jettison them to begin from scratch, and what forms that art should take, were questions that animated debate for a long time. In many respects, the first twenty years or so of the revolution can be seen as a period of restless struggle to find answers, to define art anew. The resolution to the search would eventually come in the form of a mandate from above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The words of Lenin recalled from the reminiscences of Klara Zetkin; cited in Lenin o kul’ture i iskusstve, ed. N. I. Kriutikova (Moscow, 1956), 519–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. V. Asaf’yev, ‘Krizis lichnogo tvorchestva’ and ‘Kompozitory, pospeshite!’; quoted in Akademik B. V. Asaf’yev: izbrannïye trudï [Selected Works], v (Moscow, 1957), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Lenin, New Economic Policy (New York, 1937);

    Google Scholar 

  4. quoted in B. Schwarz, Music and Musical Life in Soviet Russia (Bloomington, 2/1983 [enlarged edition, covering 1917–81]), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Lee, ‘Dimitri Szostakovitch: Young Russian Composer Tells of Linking Politics With Creative Work’, New York Times (20 Dec 1931), section 8, p.8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Downes, ‘Prokofieff Speaks’, New York Times (2 Feb 1930), section 8, p.8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Shostakovich, ‘Moi tvorcheskiy otvet’, Vechernyaya Moskva (25 Jan 1938), 3; the author and source of the quoted review have never been identified.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Shostakovich, ‘V preddverii velikoi pobedy’, Komsomol skai pravda (13 Feb 1945);

    Google Scholar 

  9. quoted in S. Khentova, Shostakovich: zhizn’i tvorchestvo, ii (Leningrad, 1986), 207.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliographical Note History and Political Culture

  • The advent of ‘glasnost’ in Gorbachev’s Soviet Union sparked the release of important documents and information about the interwar period. Among recent studies incorporating some of the new perspectives are R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution 1894–1919 (New York, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Tucker, Stalin in Power: the Revolution from Above, 1928–1941 (New York, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • and R. Conquest, Stalin: Breaker of Nations (New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • All are provided with up-to-date bibliographies. M. Heller and A. M. Nekrich provide a readable survey of the Soviet period in Utopia in Power: the History of the Soviet Union from 1917 to the Present (New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • and M. Lewin offers stimulating insights in the collection The Making of the Soviet System: Essays in the Social History of Interwar Russia (New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Articles on a wide range of topics — including creative arts, education and the media — can be found in Bolshevik Culture: Experiment and Order in the Russian Revolution ed. A. Gleason, P. Kenez and R. Stites (Bloomington, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Somewhat more subjective — though nonetheless valuable — reflections are represented by R. Medvedev, Let History Judge: the Origins and Consequences of Stalinism (rev. New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • and A. Sinyavsky, Soviet Civilization: a Cultural History, trans. J. Turnbull and N. Formozov (New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Literature, the theatre and visual arts

  • A comprehensive survey of the literary developments, official and dissident, can be found in E. J. Brown, Russian Literature Since the Revolution (rev. Cambridge, MA, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hayward’s collection of essays on literary topics and individual authors, Writers in Russia: 1917–1978 (San Diego, 1983), is noteworthy for its intelligence and erudition.

    Google Scholar 

  • An account of the political subjugation of writers by the literary bureaucracy can be found in J. and C. Garrard, Inside the Soviet Writers’ Union (New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Rudnitsky’s Russian & Soviet Theatre: Tradition & the Avant-Garde, trans. R. Permar (London, 1988) is an impressive survey, lavishly illustrated.

    Google Scholar 

  • The classic study of the artistic development of Soviet film is by J. Leyda, Kino: a History of the Russian and Soviet Film (Princeton, 3/1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • In Soviet Choreographers in the 1920s, trans. L. Visson, edited by S. Banes (Durham, 1990), E. Souritz presents a fine study of a less-researched creative sphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Elliott, in New Worlds: Russian Art and Society 1900–1937 (New York, 1986),

    Google Scholar 

  • places developments in the visual arts into cultural and political perspective; his work is complemented by the exhibition catalogue Soviet Art 1920s–1930s, ed. V. Leniashin (New York, 1988), a lavish visual panorama of the period.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pioneers of Soviet Architecture: the Search for New Solutions in the 1920s and 1930s (New York, 1987) by S. O. Khan-Magomedov is the indispensable study of the subject.

    Google Scholar 

Music

  • The rehabilitation of historical memory and resulting reassessments of our understanding of the Soviet period have been slow to penetrate musical scholarship. Although written substantially more than 20 years ago, B. Schwarz’s Music and Musical Life in Soviet Russia, 1917–1981 (rev. Bloomington, 1983) remains the standard English-language source on the history of Soviet music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soviet Composers and the Development of Soviet Music (New York, 1970) by S. Dale Krebs, though in many respects outdated, is still useful for its survey of the styles of more obscure Soviet composers.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gojowy offers a provocative glimpse into some of the lesser-known experimentalists in Neue sowjetische Musik der 20er Jahre (Laaber, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • A more tangible introduction to music of the suppressed Soviet avant-garde has begun to surface on disc, including The Music of Alexander Mosolov (Olympia OCD 176), Anton Batagov, Rails, Russian avant-garde piano music of the early 20th century (MCA Classics AED 10354), Natalia Gerassimova, Russian Songs of the 1920s (Saison Russe/CDM LDC 288025) and Music of the Soviet Composers of the 20s (Melodiya SUCD 10–00077).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Frederick Starr provides a fascinating introduction to another little-known subject in Red & Hot: the Fate of Jazz in the Soviet Union 1917–1980 (New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Robinson’s Sergei Prokofiev: a Biography (New York, 1987) is the most current English-language study of that composer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostakovich, the most prominent Soviet composer, has been served poorly by the recent literature. Testimony: the Memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich, ed. S. Volkov, trans. A. W. Bouis (New York, 1979), is sensational in its revelations, but its authenticity has never been established.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. MacDonald’s The New Shostakovich (London, 1990) is fatally flawed by its singleminded determination to prove the composer a lifelong political dissident, motivated in his music almost exclusively by subversive political concerns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Less pretentious and musically more competent approaches can be found in N. Kay, Shostakovich (London, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • and K. Meyer, Dmitri Schostakowitsch (Leipzig, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Jelagin’s Taming of the Arts, trans. N. Wreden (New York, 1951), remains among the most enlightening memoirs of musical and theatrical life in the USSR in the 1930s.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Robert P. Morgan

Copyright information

© 1993 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fay, L.E. (1993). The USSR, 1918–45. In: Morgan, R.P. (eds) Modern Times. Man & Music. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11291-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics