Skip to main content

Classes, Technology and Access

  • Chapter
Uneven Development in the Third World
  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

The economic/spatial inequalities and imbalances will be influenced by the unequal access of different income and social classes to assets, technology, information and other inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See Frances Stewart, Technology and Underdevelopment, London, Macmillan Press, 1977

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Frances Stewart, ‘Macropolicies for Appropriate Technology: An Introductory Classification’, in Jeffrey James and Susumu Watanabe (eds), Technology, Institutions and Government Policies, London, Macmillan Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashok Rudra, ‘Technology Choice in Agriculture in India over the Past Three Decades’, in Frances Stewart (ed.), Macro-Policies for Appropriate Technology in Developing Countries, Boulder, Westview Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shigeru Ishikawa, ‘Technology Import and Indigenous Technology Capacity in China’, ILO/WEP Research Working Paper Series, WEP 2-22/WP. 185. Geneva, January 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard Conroy, ‘The Disintegration and Reconstruction of the Rural Science and Technology System: Evaluation and Implications’, in A. Saith (ed.), The Re-emergence of the Chinese Peasantry. London, Croom Helm, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Athar Hussain, ‘Science and Technology in the Chinese Countryside’, in Denis Fred Simon and Merle Goldman (eds), Science and Technology in Post-Mao China, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Progress Report on the SPARKS Programme for 1988 (in Chinese), SSTC, Beijing, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Bhalla, ‘Computerisation in Chinese Industry’, Science and Public Policy, August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. K. Subramanian, ‘Chinese Technology Policy in the 1980s’, Working Paper No. 206, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala, June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amiya Kumar Bagchi, Public Intervention and Industrial Restructuring in China, India and Republic of Korea, New Delhi, ILO/ARTEP, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. R. Bhagavan, ‘Capital Goods Sector in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 9 March 1985; and Sukhamoy Chakravarty, Development Planning: The Indian Experience, Oxford, Clarendon Press 1987, Chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. UN Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology, Technology Policies and Planning — People’s Republic of China, Country Study Series, Bangalore, India, 1986, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lung-fai Wong, Agricultural Productivity in the Socialist Countries, Boulder, Westview Press, 1986, p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Ma Yuanling, Modern Plant Biotechnology and Structure of Rural Employment in China, paper prepared for the ILO Technology and Employment Branch, Geneva, ILO, 1989 (draft).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ben Stavis, ‘Agricultural Performance and Policy: Contrasts with India’, Social Scientist, May–June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lung-fai Wong, Agricultural Productivity in China and India: A Comparative Analysis, paper presented at the Symposium on Feeding the People of China and India, American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting, Chicago, 15 February 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richard Conroy, ‘Laissez faire Socialism? Prosperous Peasants and China’s Current Rural Development Strategy’, Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, no. 12, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Biplab Das Gupta, Agrarian Change and the New Technology in India, Geneva, UNRISD, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michael Lipton with Richard Long-hurst, New Seeds and Poor People, London, Unwin Hyman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cited in J. S. Sarma, Agricultural Policy in India: Growth with Equity, Ottawa, IDRC, 1982, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wong, Agricultural Productivity in China and India.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hussain,’ science and Technology in The Chinese Countryside’.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See C. H. Hanumantha Rao, Technological Change in Indian Agriculture — Emerging Trends and Perspectives, Presidential Address, The Golden Jubilee Conference of the Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, Bombay, 4–7 December 1989, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erik Baark, High Technology Innovation at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics and Planning, Roskilde University Centre, Denmark, Sept. 1987, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Anil B. Deolalikar and Anant K. Sundaram, ‘Technology Choice, Adaptation and Diffusion in Private and State-Owned Enterprises in India’, in Jeffrey James (ed.), The Technological Behaviour of Public Enterprises in Developing Countries, London, Routledge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Erik Baark, Knowhow as a Commodity: Contracts and Markets in the Diffusion of Technology in China, Research Policy Institute, University of Lund, 1986, pp. 44–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Private interview with Chen Jiyuan, Director, Institute of Rural Development of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), Beijing, September 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vernon W. Ruttan, Agricultural Research Policy, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1982, p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Iftikhar Ahmed and Vernon Ruttan, ‘Introduction’, in Iftikhar Ahmed and Vernon Ruttan (eds), Generation and Diffusion of Agricultural Innovations: The Role of Institutional Factors, Aldershot, Gower, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sudhir K. Mukhopadhyay, ‘Factors Influencing Agricultural Research and Technology: A Case Study of India’, in Ahmed and Ruttan, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hussain,’ science and Technology...’.

    Google Scholar 

  33. During this period, agricultural research accounted for 16 per cent of growth in labour productivity and 11 per cent of growth in land productivity. The corresponding contributions of other factors were: technical inputs, 81 per cent and 54 per cent; fertiliser, 50 per cent and 33 per cent; machinery, 31 per cent and 21 per cent respectively. See Wong, Agricultural Productivity in the Socialist Countries, pp. 93 and 97.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Ann Judd, James K. Boyce and Robert E. Evenson, ‘Investing in Agricultural Supply: The Determinants of Agricultural Research and Extension Investment’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, October 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. World Bank, CHINA: Socialist Economic Development, Vol. II, Washington DC, 1983, pp. 75–7; and Hussain, 1989,’ science and Technology...’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 A.S. Bhalla

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhalla, A.S. (1992). Classes, Technology and Access. In: Uneven Development in the Third World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11150-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics