Abstract
Historically unions have placed a low priority on the attainment of occupational superannuation. They and their members have generally found it more attractive to press for ‘money in the hand’ rather than for deferred payments. Many factors contributed to this state of affairs. In the post-war full employment period those seeking employment beyond the normal retirement age had little difficulty finding such work. For others, the social security system provided a ready source of retirement pensions. The fact that aged pensioners constituted a small proportion of the population, and that the pension was means tested, ensured that the taxation system could support retirement pensions without those in the workforce bearing an excessive tax burden. There were adequate investment funds for the ‘lucky country’, and the policy of tariff protection helped ensure a reasonable rate of return on investment in local manufacturing. This, in turn, helped maintain high levels of employment. In addition, employers tended to argue that superannuation was not an ‘industrial’ matter for the purpose of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act and the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission (the Commission) and unions themselves were afraid to risk a High Court challenge. In such a climate, superannuation was, in the main, the prerogative of senior and middle management, and of the public sector workforce.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1983). Census of Superannuation Funds, Australia, 1982–83, Cat. No. 5636.0.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1985). Employment Benefits, Australia, Cat. No. 6334.
Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission (1983). Reasons for Decision, National Wage Case, September.
Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission (1986a). Reasons for Decision, National Wage Case, June.
Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission (1986b). Reasons for Decision, National Wage Case, December.
Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission (1987). Reasons for Decision, National Wage Case, March.
ACTU (1979). ACTU Policy Decisions, ACTU, Melbourne.
ACTU (1980). The Relationship Between the Australian Labor Party and the Trade Unions, ACTU, Melbourne.
ACTU (1984). The Way Forward: A Positive Plan for 1984 and 1985, ACTU, Melbourne.
ACTU (1985a). The Way Forward, Major Issues, ACTU, Melbourne.
ACTU (1985b). Congress Resolutions, ACTU, Melbourne.
ACTU (1985c). ACTU Executive Decisions, March 12–15, ACTU, Melbourne.
ACTU (1985d). ACTU Bulletin.
ALP/ACTU (1983). Statement of Accord, ACTU, Melbourne.
CAI, (1985). CAI News, December.
Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1984). Australian Population Trends and Prospects. DIEA, Canberra.
Keating, P.J., (1985). Press Release No. 158.
National Industrial Construction Council (1984). ‘Memorandum of Understanding for the Improving of Industrial Relations in the Building Industry’. Mimeo.
Phillips, P.S.M., (1979). ‘Union Superannuation Funds’, Superfunds, No. 69.
The Australian (1986). 6 December issue.
Weaven, C., (1985). ‘Superannuation: The Great Leap Forward’. Mimeo, ACTU, Melbourne.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Bill Ford & David Plowman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plowman, D., Weaven, G. (1989). Unions and Superannuation. In: Ford, B., Plowman, D. (eds) Australian Unions. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11088-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11088-9_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-50206-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11088-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)