Abstract
During the first five years of Conservative government, the parties and institutions drifted out of sympathy with the political ethos of the immediate post-war consensus in response to changing external conditions and their members’ increasing discontents. Those who staffed industry’s and unions’ central organisations, however, and even more the Civil Service mandarins, still took for granted the existence of a common interest in the 1944 White Paper’s blend of mutual advantage and reciprocal obligation — if the leaders of the institutions could only be made to accept them. But the mandarins had first to contend with a novel impediment: the Churchill government’s suspicious attempts to rearrange or downgrade their functions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Sir Frank Lee, The Board of Trade (1958), p. 11.
Sir Edward Bridges, The Treasury (1964), pp. 177–9.
Sir Norman Kipping, Summing Up (1972), pp. 89–90.
Lord Birkenhead, Walter Monckton (1969), pp. 279–80; Monckton papers, Box 2, correspondence, 1950–55.
Philip Williams, Hugh Gaitskell (1982), pp. 312–18.
(D. Burn, The Steel Industry 1934–59(1979), p. 153
J. Vaizey, History of the British Steel Industry (1974), pp. 150–79.)
P. Hartley, ‘The Lost Vocation’, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 15, no. 1, January 1980.
Copyright information
© 1986 Keith Middlemas
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Middlemas, K. (1986). Men and Issues. In: Power, Competition and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10956-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10956-2_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49514-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10956-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)