Skip to main content

Post-Keynesian Theory of Distribution in the Long Run

  • Chapter

Abstract

As is well known, the post-Keynesian theory of distribution was generated during the 1950s in Cambridge (Cambridgeshire). The first formal presentation was given in a seminal paper in 1956 by Kaldor. After that Kaldor utilized this theory in formalizing several growth models (Kaldor, 1957,1961; Kaldor and Mirrlees, 1962) in order to provide a solution to Harrod’s problem on the convergence of the ‘warranted’ growth rate to the ‘natural’ growth rate. After 1966 Kaldor did not return to the post-Keynesian theory of distribution except to clarify the origins of the theory (Kaldor, 1978, 1980).

I would like to thank Tom Asimakopulos, Elido Fazi, Donald Harris, Carlo Panico, and the participants to the Conference for discussions on the present paper. Acknowledgment is also given to MPI (the Italian Ministry of Public Education) for financial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balestra, P. and M. Baranzini (1971), ‘Some Optimal Aspects in a Two Class Growth Model with a Differentiated Interest Rate,’ Kyklos, XXIV, pp. 240–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, A. C. (1973) ‘A Simple Generalization of the Kaldor-Pasinetti Theory of Profit Rate and Income Distribution’, Economica, XL, No. 159, pp. 311–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. (1968) ‘The Demand and Supply of Securities and Economic Growth and its implications for the Kaldor-Pasinetti versus Samuelson-Modigliani Controversy’, American Economic Review, LVIII, No. 2, pp. 252–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazi, E. and N. Salvadori, (1981) ‘The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor Model of Growth and Distribution’, Kyklos, XXXIV, pp. 582–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazi, E. and N. Salvadori, (1985) ‘The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in a General Cambridge Model of Growth and Distribution’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, IX, No. 2, pp. 155–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, R. (1985) ‘On the Upper-and Lower-Bounds of Workers’ Propensity to Save in a Two-Class Pasinetti Economy’, Australian Economic Papers, 24, No. 45, pp. 271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K. L. (1976) ‘Differentiated Interest Rate and Kaldor-Pasinetti Paradoxes’, Kyklos, XXIX, pp. 310–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K. L. (1977) ‘On the Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, CXCII, pp. 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1956), ‘Alternative Theories of Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, XXIII, No. 61, pp. 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1957), ‘A Model of Economic Growth’, Economic Journal, LXVII, pp. 591–624, December.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1961), ‘Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth’, in F. Lutz (ed.) The Theory of Capital (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1966) ‘Marginal Productivity and the Macro-Economic Theories of Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, XXXIII, No. 96, pp. 309–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1978) ‘Introduction’, in N. Kaldor, Further Essays on Economic Theory, Vol. 5 of Collected Economic Essays (London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1980) ‘General Introduction to Collected Economic Essays’, in N. Kaldor, Essays on Value and Distribution, 2nd edn, Vol. 1, Collected Economic Essays (London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. and J. A. Mirrlees (1962) ‘A New Model of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, XXIX, pp. 174–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laing, N. F. (1969) ‘Two Notes on Pasinetti’s Theorem’, Economic Record, XLV, No. 111, pp. 373–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maneschi, A. (1974) ‘The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, XLI, No. 125, pp. 149–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. (1963) ‘The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy’, Economic Journal, Vol. LXXIII, pp. 665–74, December.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. (1966) ‘The Outcome of the Pasinetti-Process: A Note’, Economic Journal, LXXVI, pp. 161–5, March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. and F. H. Hahn (1965) ‘The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy’, Economic Journal, LXXV, pp. 445–8, June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. J. (1974) ‘The Pasinetti Paradox Rivisited’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XLI, No. 126, pp. 297–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. J. (1978) ‘The Post-Keynesian Theory of Income Distribution in the Corporate Economy’, Australian Economic Papers, 17, No. 31, pp. 303–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mott, T. (1985–86) ‘Towards a Post-Keynesian formulation of liquidity preference’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, VIII, No. 2, pp. 222–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mückl, W. J. (1978) ‘On the Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Cambridge Models of Growth and Distribution’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, CXCIII, pp. 508–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1962) ‘Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, XXIX, pp. 267–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1964) ‘A Comment on Professor Meade’s “Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy”’, Economic Journal, LXXIV, pp. 488–9, June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1966a) ‘The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy: A Reply’, Economic Journal, LXXVI, pp. 158–60, March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1966b) ‘New Results in an Old Framework’, Review of Economic Studies, XXXIII, No. 96, pp. 303–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1974) ‘The Rate of Profit in an Expanding Economy’, in Pasinetti, Growth and Income Distribution. Essays in Economic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1983) ‘Conditions of Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and More General Models of Growth and Distribution’, Kyklos, XXXVI, pp. 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. V. (1966) ‘Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani’, Review of Economic Studies, XXXIII, No. 96, pp. 307–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori, N. (1988) ‘The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in a General Cambridge Model of Growth and Distribution: An Addendum’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, XII, No. 2, pp. 273–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. and F. Modigliani (1966a) ‘The Pasinetti Paradox in Neo-Classical and More General Models’, Review of Economic Studies, XXXIII, No. 96, pp. 269–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. and F. Modigliani (1966b) ‘Reply to Pasinetti and Robinson’, Review of Economic Studies, XXXIII, No. 96, pp. 321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Edward J. Nell and Willi Semmler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salvadori, N. (1991). Post-Keynesian Theory of Distribution in the Long Run. In: Nell, E.J., Semmler, W. (eds) Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10947-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics