Skip to main content

On the Resolution of Conflicts by Compensation

  • Chapter
Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics
  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to embed the compensation principle due to N. Kaldor into some more general framework so as to discuss conflict resolving by compensation for social as well as individual decision making. Kaldor’s intention in (1939) was to show that the classical argument for free trade does not require interpersonal comparison of utilities. In section 2 Kaldor’s compensation principle is presented in detail together with some of its criticism. In contrast to the criticism the formulation of Kaldor’s principle as given in this section does not involve utilities. This formulation then leads to a general concept of compensation presented in section 3. Compensation thereby is described by an equivalence relation on the set of alternatives. A conflict among alternatives occurs when there are (at least two) preferences that point in different directions. The conflict resolution hoped for is portrayed by the factor relation obtained by taking the conjunction of the preferences modulo the equivalence relation.

The author would like to thank T. Scitovsky and A. P. Thirlwall for valuable comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1986), ‘Beyond microeconomics. Conflict among interests in a multiple self as a determinant of value,’ in Elster (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values (New Haven and London: Yale University Press) 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (ed.) (1986), The Multiple Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1987), Interprofile Conditions and Impossibility (Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics, vol. 18) (Chur, London, Paris, New York: Harwood Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. M. (1955), ‘The intransitivity of certain criteria used in welfare economics,’ Oxford Economic Papers, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1940), ‘The valuation of social income,’ Economica, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M., and Reder, M. W. (eds) (1987), Rational Choice. The Contrast between Economics and Psychology (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, J. and Krabs, W. (eds) (1987), Recent Advances and Historical Development of Vector Optimization (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1939a), ‘Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility,’ Economic Journal, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1939b), ‘A comment,’ Review of Economic Studies, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, U. (1973), ‘Analyse und Synthese von Präferenzen,’ Operations Research Verfahren/Methods of Operations Research, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, U. (1987), ‘Hierarchical structures in multicriteria decision making,’ in Jahn and Krabs (1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. C. (1938), ‘Interpersonal comparison of utility, a comment,’ Economic Journal, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1950), ‘Evaluation of real national income,’ Oxford Economic Papers, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. (1941), ‘A note on welfare propositions in economics,’ Review of Economic Studies, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San Francisco: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler, W. (1987), ‘Initiators of multicriteria decision optimization,’ in Jahn and Krabs (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I. and Krause, U. (1986), ‘Goethe’s Faust, Arrow’s possibility theorem and the individual decision-taker,’ in Elster (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, A. (1972), International Trade. An Approach to the Theory (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L. (1985), Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (New York and London: Plenum Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Edward J. Nell and Willi Semmler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krause, U. (1991). On the Resolution of Conflicts by Compensation. In: Nell, E.J., Semmler, W. (eds) Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10947-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics