Skip to main content

Kaldor’s Growth Theories: Past, Present and Prospects for the Future

  • Chapter
Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics

Abstract

All during his life, Nicholas Kaldor touched and investigated an impressive number of areas within economic analysis. Every economist knows his path breaking papers on speculation, non-linear models of the business cycle, his alternative theory of distribution, and so many other topics on taxation and economic and monetary policy. However, growth and development theories had been a recurrent theme for him all throughout his life. Around a basic core analysis, Nicholas Kaldor continuously revised his precise views about the factors limiting growth, whereas his hypotheses have been challenged. Still more, the breaking down of previous growth trends in the 1970s and the uncertain prospects about a recovery in the 1990s bring new questions into the cumulative causation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1962), ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,’ Review of Economic Studies, 29, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1979), Slow growth in Britain: causes and consequences, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1965), The British Economy in 1975 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1988), ‘Formalizing growth regimes’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory (London: Frances Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1988), ‘Wage Labor Nexus, Technology and Long Run Dynamics: An Interpretation and preliminary tests for US’, Mimeograph prepared for the Siena workshop on ‘Technological and Social Factors in Long Term Fluctuations’, R. Goodwin (ed.) (Berlin: Springer Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1989), Regulation Theory: A Critical Assessement (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. and Coriat, B. (1986), ‘Technical Flexibility and Macro-Stabilisation’, Ricerche Economiche, XL, 4, Ottobre-Dicembre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. and Petit, P. (1981), ‘Progrès technique, croissance et emploi: un modèle d’inspiration kaldorienne pour six industries européennes’, Revue Economique, 32, 6, novembre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., Petit, P. (1984), ‘Politiques industrielles et impact sur l’emploi: les pays européens face à la contrainte extérieure’, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 27, ler Trimestre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. Ralle, P. (1986), ‘L’insertion internationale conditionne-t-elle les formes nationales d’emploi?’, Economies et Sociétés, série p. 29, 1er trimestre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechling, R., O’Brien, P. (1967), ‘Short-run Employment Functions in Manufacturing Industries: an International Comparison’, Review of Economic and Statistics, XLIX, 3, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Economie Policy Group (1980), ‘An appraisal of World Development Prospects in the 1980s, together with a Critical Review of Work in this Field’, Cambridge Economic Policy Review, 6, 3, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caussat, L. (1981), ‘Croissance, emploi, productivité dans l’industrie américaine (1899–1976)’, Mimeograph, CEPREMAP-ENSAE, Septembre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, F. (1978), ‘Causes of Growth and Recession in World Trade’, Cambridge Economic Policy Review, 5,4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, F. and Tarling, R. (1973), ‘Cumulative causation in the growth of manufacturing industry’, Mimeo, Dept. of Applied Economics, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1986), ‘Exercices in the Economics of Learning by Doing’, Mimeograph presented at the Conference on Innovation Diffusion, Venice, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (1987), ‘Economic Development in the Very Long Run’, Mimeograph University of Southern California, Los Angeles, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F. (1987), ‘Growth Accounting’, The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, John Eatwell, & M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds), II (McMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F. and Poullier, J. (1967), Why Growth Rates differ?, Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. Freeman, C. Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete L. (eds) (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory (London: Frances Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (ed) (1984), Long Waves in the World Economy (London: Frances Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1990), ‘Kaldor’s Macro System: Too much Cumulation, Too Few Contradictions’, in Nell, E. and Semmler, W. (eds), Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?, (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, H. (1990), ‘A Kaldorian saving Function in a Two-Sectoral Linear Growth Model’, in Nell, E. and Semmler, W. (eds), Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?, (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1950), A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Juillard, M. (1988), ‘Un schéma de reproduction pour l’économie des Etats-Unis: 1948–1980. Une tentative de modélisation et quantifications’, These, Université de Genève, Juillet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1951), ‘Hicks and the Trade cycle’, The Economie Journal, LVI, December, pp, 833–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1954), ‘The Relation of Economie Growth and Cyclical Fluctuations’, Economie Journal, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1957), ‘A Model of Economie Growth’, Economie Journal, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1966), Causes of the Slow Rate of Growth in the United Kingdom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1970), “The Case for Regional Policies”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, XVII, 3, reprinted in Further Essays on Economic Theory (London: Duckworth), pp. 139–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1972), ‘The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economies’, Economic Journal, Vol. 82, December reprinted 1978 in Further Essays on Economic Theory, (London: Duckworth), pp. 176–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1979), ‘Equilibrium Theory and Growth Theory’, in Boskin, M. J. (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare (London: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1981), ‘The Role of increasing returns, Technical Progress and Cumulative Causation in the Theory of International Trade’, Economie Appliquée, XXXIV, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1986), ‘Limits on Growth’, Oxford Economic Paper 38, pp. 187–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. and Mirrless, J. (1962), ‘A New Model of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1981), ‘Trade, Accumulation and Uneven Development’, Journal of Development Economics, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, H. D. (1990), ‘Technical Change, Growth and Distribution: A Steady-State Approach to “Unsteady” Growth on Kaldorian Lines’, in Nell, E. and Semmler, W. (eds), Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?, (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, C. (1988), ‘Un modèle de croissance de longue période de l’industrie manufacturière américaine’. Mémoire de DEA, Mimeograph EHESS, Octobre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988), ‘On the mechanisms of Economie Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, July, vol. 72, pp. 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1961), ‘Technical Change and the Rate of Innovation’, Econometrica, 29, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. (1990), ‘Profit Squeeze and Keynesian Theory’, in Nell, E. and Semmler, W. (eds), Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?, (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michl, T. (1985), ‘International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: VER-DOORN’s law revisited’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, VII, 4, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1957), Economic Theory and Underdevelopped Regions (London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh A. (1978), ‘Differences in Growth Rates and Kaldor’s laws’, Economica, 45, February, pp. 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, P. (1986), Slow Growth and the Service Economy (London: Frances Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, P. (1988), ‘Incidences de la tertiarisation sur l’organisation industrielle et le rapport salarial’, ch. IV Rapport collectif CEPREMAP-CGP, Aspects de la crise, Tome I, février.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralle, P. (1988), ‘Estimation d’un modèle en coupe internationale, 1960–1987’, Mimeograph, INSEE, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing returns and Long run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, October, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black box: Technology and economics, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowthorn, B. (1975), ‘What Remains of Kaldor’s Law?’, Economic Journal, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, W. E. G. (1960), Productivity and Technological Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M., S. Aaronovitch and P. Samson, (1982) ‘The influence of Cost and Demand Changes on the Rate of Change of Prices’, Applied Economics, 12, 14, pp. 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performances Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1956), ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrinos, V. G. (1987), ‘The intertemporal stability of KALDOR’s first and second growth laws in the UK’, Applied Economics, 19, 1201–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Targetti, F. (1988), Nicholas Kaldor, (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Targetti, F. (1990), ‘Change and Continuity in Kaldor’s thought on Growth and Distribution’, in Nell, E. and Semmler, W. (eds), Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economies: Confrontation or Convergence?, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirlwall, A. P. (1987), Nicholas Kaldor (Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdoorn, P. J. (1959), ‘The Role of Capital in Long Range Projections’, Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles, 5, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. A. (1928), ‘Increasing Returns and Technical Progress’, Economic Journal, December.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 Edward J. Nell and Willi Semmler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boyer, R., Petit, P. (1991). Kaldor’s Growth Theories: Past, Present and Prospects for the Future. In: Nell, E.J., Semmler, W. (eds) Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10947-0_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics