Advertisement

The Aristocracy of Labour in Nineteenth-Century Britain, c.1850–1900

  • Robert Gray
Chapter
  • 59 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Economic and Social History book series (SESH)

Abstract

THUS George Potter, prominent trade unionist and radical journalist. Similar phrases are scattered through contemporary accounts of the working class in the third quarter of the nineteenth century, emphasising the role of an ‘aristocracy of the working classes’ distinguished from other workers by their way of life, values and attitudes, as much as by a superior economic position. They were often seen as a moderating influence on the politics of popular protest, contributing to the mid-century disintegration of mass movements such as Chartism. Historians following the lines of enquiry suggested by this contemporary analysis have adopted the term ‘labour aristocracy’ to indicate such groupings within the working class. How valid are these attempts to identify a distinct upper stratum? And how did divisions within the working class affect the militancy and class consciousness of the labour movement in the decades after 1850? Studies of the labour aristocracy continue to provoke a lively debate around these problems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Note and References

  1. 1.
    See A. Gramsci, Selections from Prison Notebooks (1971); for a critique of mechanistic Marxism, see especially pp. 158–85.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See for example R. Blackburn (ed.), Ideology in Social Science (1972); J. H. Goldthorpe et al., The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure (Cambridge, 1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. N. Paton et al., A Study of the Diet of the Labouring Classes in the City of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, c. 1900) p. 30.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I am indebted to J. Woodhurst for allowing me to read as yet unpublished research investigating these crucial problems.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See M. Weber, ‘Class, Status and Party’, in H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1948). It should be noted that Weber did not simply add a qualification to Marx’s emphasis on class conflict, but also defined class in a different and in some ways more narrowly ‘economic’ sense. Reid [1978, 356 footnote] interestingly suggests ‘Weberian’ elements in Crossick [1978] and Gray [1976]; but a recognition of the phenomena to which Weber drew attention does not imply any necessary commitment to his conceptualisation of them — it could for instance contribute to a more complex and flexible understanding of a Marxian concept of class struggle. These theoretical issues are outside our present scope, but for recent Marxist discussion on class see Judith Bloomfield, ‘Marxist Writing on Class’, Marxism Today (October 1978); and A. Hunt (ed.), Class and Class Structure (1977).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    This criticism is probably more applicable to some of Weber’s self-styled disciples than to Weber himself; if Marx has suffered mechanistic distortion at the hands of ‘vulgar Marxists’ Weber has met an analogous fate in academic sociology.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For the impact of Lenin’s ideas in creating greater awareness of colonial issues, see S. MacIntyre, Imperialism and the British Labour Movement in the 1920s (Our History pamphlet no. 64, Communist Party History Group, 1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Eley, ‘Defining Social Imperialism’, Social History, no. 3 (1976) similarly criticises manipulative analyses of lower-middle-class participation in patriotic movements in Germany.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See J. Keegan, The Face of Battle (Harmondsworth: Penguin edn, 1978), pp. 221–4.Google Scholar

Bibliography: Section I: Source Materials

  1. Booth, Charles, Life and Labour of the People of London (5 vols, 1969; reprint of 1902 edn). This massive survey (much of it in fact by Booth’s associates, including Beatrice Potter, the future Beatrice Webb) is sooner or later consulted by every student of the period.Google Scholar
  2. Burnett, J. (ed.), Useful Toil: Autobiographies of Working People from the 1820s to the 1920s (1974). Includes recently discovered manuscripts as well as reprinting excerpts from some better-known autobiographies.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, G. D. H., and Filson, A. W. (eds), British Working Class Movements: Select Documents, 1787–1875 (1951). A standard collection covering main developments in trade unions, cooperatives, radicalism, and so on.Google Scholar
  4. Gorman, J., Banner Bright (1973). Generously illustrated study of trade union banners, showing their value for the study of attitudes and social imagery; particularly good on mid-Victorian craft ideologies.Google Scholar
  5. MacDougall, I. (ed.), The Minutes of Edinburgh Trades Council, 1859–1873 (Edinburgh: Scottish History Society, 1968). edited example of a key source for Victorian trade unionism.Google Scholar
  6. Parliamentary Papers. The official enquiries for which the period is justly famous are an indispensable historical source — for the attitudes of the investigators as well as for their findings! Major enquiries in the second half of the century included Royal Commissions on Trade Unions (1867), Friendly Societies (1871–4), Housing (1884–5), and Labour (1892–4); all these and much else of relevance appear in the Irish University Press series of facsimile reprints of Parliamentary Papers.Google Scholar
  7. Razell, P. E., and Wainwright, R. W. (eds), The Victorian Working Class: Selections from Letters to the Morning Chronicle (1973). Newspaper series (the ‘letters’ were in fact lengthy commissioned articles) first published 1849, describing social conditions in various parts of England and Wales; far more conventional in approach than Mayhew’s articles on London (see next item), which they accompanied.Google Scholar
  8. Thompson, E. P., and Yeo, E. (eds), The Unknown Mayhew (1971). Penetrating contemporary analysis of the growth of sweating; unusually among Victorian observers, Mayhew allows working people to speak for themselves and takes their own analysis of their situation seriously.Google Scholar
  9. Wright, Thomas, The Great Unwashed (reprint 1970; first published 1868). Classic semi-autobiographical description of working-class life and attitudes from the point of view of skilled labour, first published under the pseudonym ‘Journeyman Engineer’; like many contemporary accounts, this is part of the debate about the consequences of parliamentary reform (note date of publication).Google Scholar

Section II: Historical Studies

  1. Alexander, S., ‘Women’s Work in Nineteenth-Century London’, in J. Mitchell and A. Oakley (eds), Rights and Wrongs of Women (Harmondsworth, 1976).Google Scholar
  2. Allen, E., et al, The North-East Engineers’ Strikes of 1871 (Newcastle-on-Tyne, 1971).Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, M., Family Structure in Nineteenth-Century Lancashire (Cambridge, 1971).Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, P., ‘Will the Real Bill Banks Please Stand Up?’, Journal of Social History, 12 (1979). Questions over-simple interpretations of commitment to respectability.Google Scholar
  5. Barnsby, G., ‘The Standard of Living in the Black Country’, EcHR, 24 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. Bell, Donald H., ‘Worker Culture and Worker Politics: the Experience of an Italian Town, 1880–1915’, SH, vol. 3 (1978).Google Scholar
  7. Best, G., Mid-Victorian Britain 1851–1875 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. Brown, M. Barratt, After Imperialism (revised edn, 1970). Of relevance to the economic context of working-class development.Google Scholar
  9. Burgess, K., ‘Technological Change and the 1852 Lock-out in the British Engineering Industry’, IRSH, 14 (1969). Important study, quantifying the spread of new technologies and showing their relationship to industrial conflict.Google Scholar
  10. —, ‘Trade Union Policy and the 1852 Lock-out in the British Engineering Industry’, IRSH, 17 (1972). Cf. Murphy [1978].Google Scholar
  11. —, The Origins of British Industrial Relations (1975).Google Scholar
  12. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3 (1979). Contains several articles on the labour process in nineteenth-century industry.Google Scholar
  13. Child, J., Industrial Relations in the British Printing Industry (1967).Google Scholar
  14. Clegg, H. A., Fox, A., and Thompson, A. F., A History of British Trade Unions Since 1889 (Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar
  15. Cole, G. D. H., ‘Some Notes on British Trade Unions in the Third Quarter of the Nineteenth Century’, reprinted in E. M. Carus-Wilson (ed.), Essays in British Economic History, vol. iii (1962).Google Scholar
  16. Crossick, G., An Artisan Elite in Victorian Society: Kentish London, 1840–1880 (1978). An important local study, of wider significance.Google Scholar
  17. —, (ed.), The Lower Middle Class in Britain, 1870–1914 (1977). Essays on various aspects of this hitherto neglected social group, often assumed to be socially close to the labour aristocracy.Google Scholar
  18. Cullen, M. J., ‘The 1887 Survey of the London Working Class’, IRSH, 20 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. Cunningham, H., The Volunteer Force (1976).Google Scholar
  20. Davidoff, L., ‘Mastered for Life’, Journal of Social History, 7 (1974). Relates domestic service to the subordination of women in society and the family.Google Scholar
  21. Donajgrodzki, A. P. (ed.), Social Control in Nineteenth-Century Britain (1977).Google Scholar
  22. Field, J., ‘British Historians and the Concept of the Labour Aristocracy’, Radical History Review, 19 (1978–9). Stimulating discussion of the value and limitations of different uses of the concept.Google Scholar
  23. Foster, J., Class Struggle and the Industrial Revolution (1974). A controversial interpretation of the emergence of the labour aristocracy, based on a pioneering local study of Oldham; this important work continues to stimulate discussion: see especially Stedman Jones (1975).Google Scholar
  24. Fraser, W. Hamish, Trade Unions and Society: the Struggle for Acceptance, 1850–1880 (1974).Google Scholar
  25. Gilding, B., The Journeymen Coopers of East London (History Workshop pamphlet, 1971). A detailed study of working practice and craft custom.Google Scholar
  26. Gray, R. Q., The Labour Aristocracy in Victorian Edinburgh (Oxford, 1976). See comments in Field [1978–9], Moorhouse [1978], Morris [1977].Google Scholar
  27. Gupta, P. S., Imperialism and the British Labour Movement 1914–1964 (1975). See ch. 1 for discussion of the pre-First World War background.Google Scholar
  28. Hanson, C. G., ‘Craft Unions, Benefits and the Case for Trade Union Law Reform, 1867–1875’, EcHR, 28 (1975). See also Thane [1976].Google Scholar
  29. Harrison, R., Before the Socialists: Studies in Labour and Politics, 1861–1881 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. —, (ed.) Independent Collier (1978). A major contribution, this collection of essays challenges much received wisdom about the mining industry.Google Scholar
  31. Hobsbawm, E. J., Labouring Men (1964a). Includes a well-known essay on the labour aristocracy, and other pioneering studies of the nineteenth-century working class.Google Scholar
  32. —, ‘The Nineteenth-Century London Labour Market’, in R. Glass (ed.), London: Aspects of Change (1964b).Google Scholar
  33. Hopkin, D., ‘The Membership of the Independent Labour Party, 1904–1910: a Spatial and Occupational Analysis’, IRSH, 20 (1975).Google Scholar
  34. Hopkins, E., ‘Small Town Aristocrats of Labour and their Standard of Living, 1840–1914’, EcHR, 28 (1975). Study of glass-workers in Stourbridge; also looks comparatively at more depressed groups.Google Scholar
  35. Hunt, E. H., Regional Wage Variations in Britain, 1850–1914 (Oxford, 1973).Google Scholar
  36. Jeffreys, J. B., The Story of the Engineers (1945). A model trade union history, places institutional development in its economic, industrial and social context.Google Scholar
  37. Jeffreys, M., and Jeffreys, J. B., ‘The Wages, Hours and Trade Customs of Skilled Engineers in 1861’, EcHR 1st series, 17 (1947).Google Scholar
  38. Jones, G. Stedman, Outcast London (Oxford, 1971). A major study of casual labour and sweating.Google Scholar
  39. —, ‘Working Class Culture and Working Class Politics in London, 1870–1900’, Journal of Social History, 7 (1974).Google Scholar
  40. —, ‘Class Struggle and the Industrial Revolution’, New Left Review, 90 (1975). Discussion of Foster [1974].Google Scholar
  41. —, ‘Class Expression versus Social Control: a Critique of Recent Trends in the Social History of Leisure’, History Workshop Journal, 4 (1977).Google Scholar
  42. Joyce, P., ‘The Factory Politics of Lancashire in the Later Nineteenth Century’, Historical Journal, 18 (1975).Google Scholar
  43. Kingsford, P. W., Victorian Railwaymen (1970).Google Scholar
  44. Lenin, V. I., Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, in Selected Works (one vol. edn, Moscow, 1968; also available in numerous other edns). Contains Lenin’s sketchy but influential comments on the labour aristocracy. Cf. Barratt Brown [1970].Google Scholar
  45. Levitt, I., and Smout, T. C., The State of the Scottish Working Class in 1843 (Edinburgh, 1979). See especially ch. 5–7.Google Scholar
  46. Liddington, J., and Norris, J., One Hand Tied Behind Us: the Rise of the Women’s Suffrage Movement (1978). Uses oral evidence to relate suffrage and trade union activity to industrial and family structure.Google Scholar
  47. Lunn, K. (ed.), Hosts, Immigrants and Minorities (1980).Google Scholar
  48. Marx, K., Capital, vol. I (Harmondsworth; Pelican edn, 1976). See chs 13–15 for Marx’s analysis of different forms of production under capitalism.Google Scholar
  49. Marx, K., and Engels, F., On Britain (1962). See especially Engels’s 1892 preface to the Condition of the Working Class, and comments in letters.Google Scholar
  50. Meiling, J., ‘Noncommissioned Officers: British Employers and their Supervisory Workers, 1880–1920’, SH, vol. 5 (1980). A major contribution, exploring a hitherto neglected topic.Google Scholar
  51. Moorhouse, H. F., ‘The Marxist Theory of the Labour Aristocracy’, SH, vol. 3 (1978). Stimulating critique of the concept: see also Reid [1978].Google Scholar
  52. Morris, R. J., ‘Bargaining with Hegemony’, Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, 35 (1977). Review article discussing Gray [1976]; makes original points of great interest.Google Scholar
  53. —, Class and Class Consciousness in the Industrial Revolution, 1780–1850 (1979).Google Scholar
  54. Moss, Bernard H., The Origins of the French Labor Movement, 1830–1914: the Socialism of Skilled Workers (Berkley and London, 1976). Suggests interesting similarities and comparisons with Britain; assumes existence of British labour aristocracy and argues there was no French equivalent.Google Scholar
  55. Murphy, P. J., ‘The Origins of the 1852 Lock-out in the British Engineering Industry Reconsidered’, IRSH, 23 (1978). Criticises Jeffreys [1945] and Burgess [1972].Google Scholar
  56. Musson, A. E., British Trade Unions, 1800–1875 (1962).Google Scholar
  57. Neale, R. S., ‘The Standard of Living, 1780–1844: a Regional and Class Study’, EcHR, 19 (1966). Of wider methodological importance.Google Scholar
  58. Pelling, H., Popular Politics and Society in Late Victorian Britain (1968). Includes a critique of the labour aristocracy, and essays on other relevant themes.Google Scholar
  59. Pollard, S., History of Labour in Sheffield (1959).Google Scholar
  60. —, ‘Nineteenth-Century Cooperation: from Community-Building to Shopkeeping’, in A. Briggs and J. Saville (eds), Essays in Labour History (1960).Google Scholar
  61. Porter, J. H., ‘Wages Bargaining under Conciliation Agreements, 1860–1914’, EcHR, 23 (1970).Google Scholar
  62. Price, R., ‘The Working Men’s Club Movement and Victorian Social Reform Ideology’, Victorian Studies, 15 (1971).Google Scholar
  63. —, An Imperial War and the British Working Class (1972).Google Scholar
  64. —, ‘The Other Face of Respectability: Violence in the Manchester Brickmaking Trade, 1859–1870’, Past and Present, 66 (1975).Google Scholar
  65. Prothero, I. J., ‘London Chartism and the Trades’, EcHR, 24 (1971).Google Scholar
  66. Reid, A., ‘Politics and Economics in the Formation of the British Working Class: a Response to H. F. Moorhouse’, SH, vol. 3 (1978).Google Scholar
  67. Reid, D. A., ‘The Decline of Saint Monday, 1766–1876’, Past and Present, 71 (1976).Google Scholar
  68. Roberts, E., ‘Working-Class Standards of Living in Barrow and Lancaster, 1890–1914’, EcHR, 30 (1977). Uses oral evidence.Google Scholar
  69. Roberts, R., The Classic Slum (Manchester, 1971).Google Scholar
  70. Robertson, P. L., ‘Technical Education in the British Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Industry, 1863–1914’, EcHR, 27 (1974).Google Scholar
  71. —, ‘Demarcation Disputes in British Shipbuilding before 1914’, IRSH, 20 (1975).Google Scholar
  72. Samuel, R., ‘The Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain’, History Workshop Journal, 3 (1977).Google Scholar
  73. Schmiechen, J. A., ‘State Reform and the Local Economy: an Aspect of Industrialisation in Late Victorian and Edwardian London’, EcHR, 28 (1975). Shows how attempts to control outwork in some districts led to its intensification in others.Google Scholar
  74. Scott, Joan, The Glass Workers of Carmaux (Cambridge, Mass., 1974). Excellent local and occupational study of French skilled labour.Google Scholar
  75. Semmel, B., Imperialism and Social Reform (1960).Google Scholar
  76. Shepherd, M. A., ‘The Origins and Incidence of the Term “Labour Aristocracy’”, Bulletin of Society for the Study of Labour History, 37 (1978). See also comment by Meiling, ibid. (Autumn 1979).Google Scholar
  77. Slaven, A., ‘Earnings and Productivity in the Scottish Coalmining Industry during the Nineteenth Century’, in P. L. Payne (ed.), Studies in Scottish Business History (1967).Google Scholar
  78. Storch, R. D., ‘The Plague of Blue Locusts’, IRSH, 20 (1975).Google Scholar
  79. Summers, A., ‘Militarism in Britain before the Great War’, History Workshop Journal, 2 (1976).Google Scholar
  80. Taylor, S., ‘The Effect of Marriage on Job Possibilities for Women and the Ideology of the Home: Nottingham, 1890–1930’, Oral History, 5 (1977).Google Scholar
  81. Thane, P., ‘Craft Unions, Welfare Benefits and the Case for Trade Union Reform’, EcHR, 29 (1976). Rejoinder to Hanson [1975].Google Scholar
  82. Tholfsen, T., Working-Class Radicalism in Mid-Victorian England (1976). Emphasises continuities of earlier popular radicalism and middle-class Liberalism.Google Scholar
  83. Thompson, E. P., ‘The Peculiarities of the English’, reprinted in The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (1978). Interpretative essay taking a broad sweep of English social history; includes perceptive comments on the character of the labour movement.Google Scholar
  84. Treble, J. H., ‘The Seasonal Demand for Labour in Glasgow, 1890–1914’, SH, vol. 3 (1978).Google Scholar
  85. Turner, H. A., Trade Union Growth, Structure and Policy: a Study of the Cotton Unions (1962). Explores problems of ‘closed’ or ‘open’ forms of organisation; of great relevance to concepts of labour aristocracy.Google Scholar
  86. Vincent, J. R., The Formation of the Liberal Party (1966). Emphasises popular demands for participation and social recognition as part of the dynamic of Liberalism.Google Scholar
  87. Webb, S., and Webb, B., The History of British Trade Unions (revised edn, 1920). Classic study that deservedly remains influential; for criticisms see Cole [1962] and Musson [1962].Google Scholar
  88. Yeo, S., Religion and Voluntary Organisations in Crisis (1976). Explores the theme of civic participation in a number of contexts in Reading.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Economic History Society 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.Portsmouth PolytechnicUK

Personalised recommendations