Overmanning

  • J. L. Porket
Part of the St Antony’s book series

Abstract

Although open unregistered unemployment is far from negligible in the Soviet Union, it is of lesser significance than the underutilization of the employed labour force, i.e. hidden unemployment. Of its three dimensions, one (part-time employment although full-time employment is desired) can hardly arise in the Soviet Union, because there full-time employment is the rule and part-time employment is practically non-existent. In fact, as social surveys reveal, the reverse is the case: quite a few employed women would prefer to be employed part-time instead of full-time, and at least some retired workers would be willing to take up a job if opportunities for part-time employment were available. In contrast, the remaining two dimensions of hidden unemployment (overmanning and employment below skill level against one’s wish) are to be found in the Soviet Union. The former is discussed below, the latter in the next chapter.

Keywords

Migration Income Marketing Expense Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 6.
    V.N. Kalmykov, Aktua’nye problemy razvitogo sotsializma (Minsk: ‘Vysheishaya shkola’, 1984) pp. 54–5.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    Yu.V. Andropov, Izbrannye rechi i sta’i (Moskva: Izdate’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1983, second edition) p. 224.Google Scholar
  3. 14.
    Quoted by A.Ya. Kvasha, Demograficheskaya politika v SSSR (Moskva: ‘Tinansy i statistika’, 1981) p. 141.Google Scholar
  4. 24.
    E.B. Breeva, Naselenie i zanyatost’ (Moskva: ‘Finansy i statistika’, 1984) p. 107. In contrast with experimental-statistical output norms which are a result of averaging past performance, technically based output norms result from time and motion studies.Google Scholar
  5. 27.
    V.F. Sbytov, Upravlenie sotsial’nymi i ideologicheskimi protsessami v period razvitogo sotsializma (Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’, 1983) p. 201, Table 16.Google Scholar
  6. 28.
    G. Gorbei, ‘Rabochee vremya — rabote’, Sotsialisticheski trud, no. 2 (1981), pp. 45–50; V.T. Ryazanov, Raspredelenie po trudu (Leningrad: Izdate’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1984) pp. 200–1; A.N. Komozin and A. K. Meshcherkin, ‘Kollektivnye formy truda v usloviyakh ekonomicheskogo eksperimenta’, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 1 (1986), p. 23.Google Scholar
  7. 34.
    V.G. Kostakov and E.L. Manevich, ‘Vazhneishie problemy ispol’zovaniya trudovykh resursov’, in V.G. Kostakov and E.L. Manevich (eds.), Regional’nye problemy naseleniya i trudovye resursy SSSR (Moska: ‘Statistika’, 1978) p. 28.Google Scholar
  8. 41.
    Peter Rutland, ‘The Shchekino Method and the Struggle to Raise Labour Productivity in Soviet Industry’, Soviet Studies, vol. XXXVI, no. 3 (July 1984), p. 349, Table 3.Google Scholar
  9. 45.
    The draft law was discussed by Darrell Slider, ‘Reforming the Workplace: The 1983 Soviet Law On Labour Collectives’, Soviet Studies, vol. XXXVII, no. 2 (April 1985), pp. 173–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. and the law by Anatole Siline, ‘The new role of workers’ collectives in the USSR’, International Labour Review, vol. 123, no. 6 (November–December 1984), pp. 743–51.Google Scholar
  11. 46.
    V.A. Maslennikov, Trudovoi kollektiv i ego konstitutsionnnyi status, (Moskva: Izdate’stvo ‘Nauka’, 1984,) pp. 18–9.Google Scholar
  12. 47.
    V.P. Khizhnyak et al., Sotsialisticheskii trudovoi kollektiv, (Kiev: ‘Vishcha shkola’, 1984,) p. 27.Google Scholar
  13. 49.
    G.A. Belov (ed.), Sotsial’nye ipoliticheskie otnosheniya razvitogo sotsializma (Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1985), p. 108.Google Scholar
  14. 58.
    A.Ya. Boyarskii et al., Naselenie SSSR (Moskva: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1974) p. 148, and Narodnoe khozyaistvo SSSR, (1985,) p. 389. In 1985, the share continued to be 20 per cent.Google Scholar
  15. 60.
    Alec Nove, The Soviet Economic System (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1980, second edition) p. 152.Google Scholar
  16. 62.
    I.I. Lukinov et al., Agrarnye problemy razvitogo sotsializma, (Kiev: ‘Naukova dumka’, 1979,) pp. 324–5, and S.V. Moskvin, Tekhnika v sel’skom khozyaistve i ee otdacha’, EKO, no. 9 (1986), pp. 93–111.Google Scholar
  17. 63.
    Stefan Hedlund, Crisis in Soviet Agriculture (London: Croom Helm, 1984) pp. 178 and 183–4.Google Scholar
  18. 64.
    For 1961–73 see V.P. Efimov and V.I. Manyakin, Effektivnost’ sel’skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva v SSSR (Moskva: ‘Statistika’, 1977) p. 137, Table 65.Google Scholar
  19. 66.
    A.D. Smirnov and K. Sabo (eds.), Obshchestvennaya forma truda pri sotsializme (Moskva: ‘Ekonomika’, 1984) pp. 109–110.Google Scholar
  20. 67.
    Alastair McAuly, Women’s Work and Wages in the Soviet Union (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1981) pp. 106–7, and V.S. Dragel’, ‘Sezonnost’ i ritmichnost’ truda kolkhoznikov’, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 3 (1983), pp. 126–8.Google Scholar
  21. 68.
    For 1967 see M.Ya. Sonin, Razvitie narodonaseleniya, (Moskva: Statistika, 1980,) p. 130.Google Scholar
  22. For 1972 see Robert A. Lewis and Richard H. Rowland, Population Redistribution in the USSR (New York: Praeger, 1979. p. 389, Table 7.9.Google Scholar
  23. 69.
    Jiri Zuzanek, Work and Leisure in the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1980) p. 124.Google Scholar
  24. 72.
    This estimate is based on Alastair McAuley, op. cit. p. 111, Table 6.7, and Z.I. Kalugina and T.P. Antonova, Lichnoe podsobnoe khozyaistvo sel’skogo naseleniya (Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’, 1984) p. 123, Table 4.8Google Scholar
  25. 78.
    M.I. Kozyr’, Pravo kolkhoznoi sobstvennosti v period razvitogo sotsializma (Moskva: ‘Nauka’, 1985) p. 135.Google Scholar
  26. 81.
    The difficulties facing the régime in implementing its commitment of 1982 and 1983 to expand the brigade system in agriculture were discussed by Alec Nove, ‘Soviet Agriculture: Problems and Prospects’, in Curtis Keeble (ed.), The Soviet State: The Domestic Roots of Soviet Foreign Policy (Aldershot: Gower, 1985) pp. 96–8.Google Scholar
  27. On the normless link (zveno) and the contract brigade in agriculture see also V.P. Gagnon, Jr., ‘Gorbachev and the Collective Contract Brigade’, Soviet Studies, vol. XXXIX, no. 1 (January 1987), pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 85.
    William Moskoff, Labour and Leisure in the Soviet Union (London: Macmillan, 1984) pp. 56–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patrick Murphy, ‘Soviet Shabashniki: Material Incentives at Work’, Problems of Communism, vol. XXXIV, no. 6 (November–December 1985), pp. 48–57.Google Scholar
  30. 87.
    V. Vezlomtsev, ‘Orientatsiya na vysshii uroven’ prizvoditel’nosti truda: Kak usilit’ stimulirovanie’, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 9 (September 1985), p. 28, and Henry Norr, ‘Shchekino: Another Look’, Soviet Studies, vol. XXXVIII, no. 2 (April 1986), pp. 141–169. Norr also recalls that in the early 1980s the Soviet press began to trace the Shchekino method back to Lenin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© J. L. Porket 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Porket
    • 1
  1. 1.St Antony’s CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations