Abstract
In the years immediately following the widespread but unsuccessful revolutionary action of 1905-7, some of Russia’s leading socialist intellectuals toyed with the notion of promoting revolutionary ideology in the form of religious faith. By this, they hoped to encourage an atmosphere of shared purpose, excitement, union and self-denial in an increasingly uncertain and divided revolutionary movement. The ‘god-building’ theory, as it was known, received only limited support among Russian social democrats, and was stifled within less than ten years largely as a result of Lenin’s personal intervention. It has taken more than seventy years for a modified form of the same idea to re-emerge in Soviet writing, but since the mid-1970s a new kind of god-building has found its way into novels by three well-established writers frequently associated with the ‘village prose’ school:1 Pëtr Proskurin, Chingiz Aitmatov and Vladimir Tendriakov. Their work is largely devoted to traditionally ‘village’ themes such as the protection of the environment, of cultural tradition and family ties; but some examples of their writing also emphasise specially the need to protect and preserve as a supreme Absolute the principle of the strong, undivided social collective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
NOTES
For an introduction to village prose and its origins, see: Geoffrey Hosking, Beyond Socialist Realism (St Albans, 1980) pp. 50–83.
A. Lunacharsky, Religiia i sotsializm, 2 vols (vol. 1, St Petersburg, 1908; vol. 2, St Petersburg, 1911). See also: Christopher Read, Religion, Revolution and the Russian Intelligentsia, 1900–1912 (London and Basingstoke, 1979) pp. 78–85, hereafter referred to as Read, Religion . . . .
M. Gorky, Ispoved’ (St Petersburg, 1907).
V.I. Lenin, Sochineniia, 4th edn, vol. XxxV (Moscow, 1954–66) pp. 81–91. See also: Bertram D. Wolfe, The Bridge and the Abyss (Connecticut, 1967) pp. 43–53.
Gorky, Ispoved’ in Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, vol. ix (Moscow, 1969–76) p. 322.
Ibid., p. 342. Translation as in: Read, Religion . . ., p. 86.
Ibid., pp. 347–8.
Ibid., pp. 385–9.
Ibid., p. 389. Translation as in: Read, Religion . . ., p. 87.
Announced by Radio Moscow 2, 19.30 h., 27 June 1987.
Critics still tend to be cautious about what they say in writing, but the journal Ogonek has published general articles attacking mediocrity and conservative attitudes in literature, which reportedly generated violent reactions from the right wing of the literary establishment of which Proskurin is a prominent member. See: B. Sarnov, ‘Bor’ba za pravo pisat’ plokho’, Ogonek, No. 23 (1987); N. Il’ina, ‘Zdravstvui plemia, mladoe, neznakomoe ...’, Ogonek, No. 2 (1988); J. Wishnevsky, ‘Literary Criticism in the glasnost’ era’, Radio Liberty Bulletin, No. 377, 28 September 1987; J. Wishnevsky, ‘Ogonek Exposes Corruption in Literature’, Radio Liberty Bulletin, No. 40, 2 February 1988.
Pëtr Proskurin, Sud’ba, Moskva, No. 8 (1972) pp. 11–117; No. 9 (1972) pp. 12–145; No. 10 (1972) pp. 11–114; No. 11 (1972) pp. 12–126.
Pëtr Proskurin, Imia Tvoe, Moskva, No. 2 (1977) pp. 3–109; No. 3 (1977) pp. 3–150; No. 4 (1977) pp. 15–148; No. 5 (1977) pp. 7–133.
Proskurin, Imia Tvoe, in Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 5 (Moscow, 1981–3) p. 630.
Proskurin, Sud’ba in Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 4 (1983) p. 559.
Viktor Chalmaev, Sotvorenie sud’by (Moscow, 1983) pp. 272–3.
Proskurin, Sud’ba, p. 376.
Gorky, Ispoved’, p. 340.
Proskurin, Imia Tvoe, p. 636.
Ibid., p. 649.
Ibid., pp. 582–3. See: Velikaia derzhava ... budet svetit’.
The ‘single stream’ (edinyi potok) interpretation of Russian history does not regard the revolution as a leap into higher reality and tends to inflate the significance of pre-revolutionary figures and events. It is well illustrated by V. Chalmaev’s articles, ‘Velikie iskaniia’ and “Neizbezhnost”, published in the late 1960s: V. Chalmaev, ‘Velikie iskaniia’, Molodaia gvardiia, No. 3 (1968); V. Chalmaev, “Neizbezhnost”, Molodaia gvardiia, No. 9 (1968). For controversies surrounding these see: John Dunlop, The Faces of Contemporary Russian Nationalism (Princeton, 1983) pp. 219–27.
Proskurin, Imia Tvoe, pp. 267–83.
See, for instance: Proskurin, Imia Tvoe, p. 40: To chto mozhet sovershit’ chelovek za odnu zhizn’, - grandiozno, nepostizhimo, no ved’ eto tozhe vkhodit v prirodu, znachit, ona-to i est’ put’, ona i est’ tsel’. Gorky too sees nature as the all embracing force that can and should rule men’s lives; see Ispoved’, p. 389.
Proskurin, Sud’ba, p. 642.
According to Karl Popper’s definition, ‘historicism’ is an approach which aims to discover the ‘rhythms’, ‘patterns’, ‘laws’ or ‘trends’ underlying the evolution of history. K. Popper, The Poverty of Historicism (London, 1961) p. 3.
See Irena Maryniak, ‘Religious Themes in the Novels of Chingiz Aitmatov’, paper presented at the Second European Seminar on Central Asian Studies, University of London (SOAS), 7–10 April 1987.
Chingiz Aitmatov, Plakha, Novyi mir, No. 6 (1986) pp. 7–69; No. 8 (1986) pp. 90–148; No. 9 (1986) pp. 6–64.
See, for instance: I. Kryvelev, ‘Koketnichaia s bozhen’koi’, Komsomol’skaia pravda, 30 July 1986; V. Lakshin, ‘Po pravde govoria’, Izvestiia, 3/4 December 1986; E. Evtushenko, ‘Istochnik nravstvennosti - kul’tura’, Komsomol’skaia pravda, 10 December 1986; ‘Paradoksy romana ili paradoksy vospriiatiia’, Literaturnaia gazeta, 15 October 1986.
Evgenii Pazukhin, ‘Blagie namereniia’, Biulleten’ khristianskoi obshchestvennosti, No. 1–2 (Moscow, 1987) pp. 271–9. Keston College Archive.
“Tsena - zhizn”, Literaturnaia gazeta, 13 August 1986.
Compare Plakha, Novyi mir, No. 8 (1986) pp. 104–19, with the conversation between Pilate and Ieshua Ga Nostri in Mikhail Bulgakov, Master i Margarita (Frankfurt/Main, 1969) pp. 27–43.
Aitmatov, Plakha, Novyi mir, No. 8 (1986) p. 114.
Ibid., Novyi mir, No. 6 (1986) pp. 37–8.
See T.E. O’Connor, The Politics of Soviet Culture (Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1983) p. 112.
‘Veriu v cheloveka’, Pravda, 14 February 1987.
Learning to be Yourself , Soviet Weekly, No. 2399, 6 February 1988, P. 5.
Vladimir Tendriakov, Pokushenie na mirazhi, Novyi mir, No. 4 (1987) pp. 59–116; No. 5 (1987) pp. 89–164.
Tendriakov touches on religious subject matter in a number of works. See for example: Chudotvornaia, in Znamia, No. 5 (1958); Apostol’skaia komandirovka, in Nauka i Religiia, Nos. 8–10 (1969); Zatmenie, in Druzhba narodov, No. 5 (1977).
Tendriakov refers to narushenie obshchnosti and razobshchennost’ (Pokushenie. . ., Novyi mir, No. 4 (1987) p. 61; Gorky refers to razobshchenie (Ispoved’, p. 322).
Tendriakov, Pokushenie. . ., Novyi mir, No. 5 (1987) pp. 121 -2.
Ibid., p. 128.
Ibid., pp. 136–8.
Tendriakov, Pokushenie. . ., Novyi mir, No. 4 (1987) pp. 78–9 and No. 5 (1987) pp. 162–3. The novel culminates in Grebin’s realisation of the practical value which dobrota represents in society, through his observation of the moral instinct of his younger colleague, Misha.
Ibid., Novyi mir, No. 5 (1987) p. 149: Vera - start k istine ... etc.
Ibid., p. 164. As the novel concludes, Grebin contemplates his grandson and the future achievements of the human race: Rano ili pozdno liudi vyberut za predelami zemli simpatichnuiu planetu ... raskinut v storonu Solntsa drakonovy kryl’ia . . .
A short extract from this article has appeared in Religion in Communist Lands, xvi, No. 3 (1988) pp. 233–5.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maryniak, I. (1990). The ‘new god-builders’. In: Freeborn, R., Grayson, J. (eds) Ideology in Russian Literature. Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10825-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10825-1_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-10827-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10825-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)