Abstract
Pinter’s characters in Betrayal are boring. Preoccupied with children, home, extramarital affairs, tablecloths, and happiness, they recite the lines that have been assigned to them as educated, pampered, polite, moderately cultivated, upper-middle-class Londoners. Even their taste in modern literature is as unexceptional as it is predictable. Though they may occasionally feel obliged to read Yeats on Torcello or to take their summer holidays in the Lake District, what they really enjoy are the mundane little novels about ordinary people much like themselves in “the new Casey or Spinks.”1 Here everything is ordered, fixed, and, above all, contained. Life does not pass these people by; it merely goes on for them. “Betrayal” is in this context a rather lofty word for such bourgeois and unimaginative infidelities. For Pinter’s people in this play only think there is depth to their passions: though their lives are not exactly meaningless, the fact is they are not especially interesting. What is there about this trio, then, that compels us to study in detail every move they make as we reconstruct their sad, sometimes comic, and always ironic chronicle for who-did-what-to-whom, when, where, and under-what-circumstances? To answer these questions we must first take a hard look at some of the dramatic forms Pinter employs so skillfully in this work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Harold Pinter, Betrayal (New York, 1978), p. 116. All subsequent quotations from the play are from this edition.
Harold Pinter and Lawrence M. Bensky, “The Art of the Theater III: Harold Pinter — An Interview,” Paris Review, 10 (Fall 1966), 20.
Harold Pinter and Mel Gussow, “A Conversation [Pause] with Harold Pinter,” New York Times Magazine, 5 December 1971, p. 43.
Harold Pinter and Mel Gussow, “Harold Pinter: ‘I Started with Two People in a Pub’,” New York Times, 30 December 1979, Sec. 2, p. 5.
Harold Pinter, quoted in John Russell Taylor, “Accident,” Sight and Sound, 35 (1966), 183.
Harold Pinter, “Writing for the Theatre,” Evergreen, 8 (Aug.—Sept. 1964), 81.
Enoch Brater, “Time and Memory in Pinter’s Proust Screenplay,” Comparative Drama, 13 (1979), 124.
Harold Pinter, quoted in Leslie Garis, “Translating Fowles Into Film,” New York Times Magazine, 30 August 1981, p. 69.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Hersh Zeifman and Cynthia Zimmerman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brater, E. (1993). Cinematic Fidelity and the Forms of Pinter’s Betrayal. In: Zeifman, H., Zimmerman, C. (eds) Contemporary British Drama, 1970–90. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10819-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10819-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-10821-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10819-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)