The Importance of Trade for Developing Countries

  • Bela Balassa

Abstract

Participation in international trade provides a Variety of benefits to the developing countries. They may obtain gains through resource allocation according to comparative advantage; the exploitation of economies of scale and increased capacity utilization; improvements in technology; increases in domestic savings and foreign direct investment; and increased employment.

Keywords

Petroleum Income Turkey Malaysia Egypt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 7.
    B. Balassa, ‘The Newly-Industrializing Developing Countries after the Oil Crisis,’ Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, CXVII (1981) pp. 142–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Essay 2 in Bela Balassa, The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Economy (New York: Pergamon Press, 1981) pp. 29–81.Google Scholar
  3. 9.
    Alternative definitions of the newly-exporting countries are provided in O. Havrylyshyn and I. Alikhani, ‘Is There Cause for Export Optimism? An Inquiry into the Existence of a Second Generation of Successful Exporters,’ Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, CXVIII (1982) pp. 651–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. G. H. Hughes and D. M. G. Newbery, ‘Protection and Developing Countries’ Exports of Manufacturers,’ Economic Policy, I (1986) pp. 409–41. The former include countries with manufactured export growth rates in excess of average growth rates by the NICs during the 1970s; the latter include countries with populations in excess of 10 million and per capita incomes of at least $750 in 1983. Both of these definitions have the disadvantage of excluding India, whose manufactured exports exceed that of any newly-exporting country under the two definitions, and Pakistan that also surpassed the majority of the NECs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 11.
    This section draws on B. Balassa and Associates, Development Strategies in Semi-Industrial Countries (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    B. Balassa, ‘Policy Experiments in Chile, 1973–83’, in G. M. Walton (ed.), The National Economic Policies of Chile (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1985) pp. 203–38.Google Scholar
  7. Essay 8 in B. Balassa, Change and Challenge in the World Economy (London: Macmillan, 1985) pp. 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 20.
    A. O. Krueger, Foreign Trade Regimes & Economic Development: Liberalization Attempts and Consequences (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1978), p. 282.Google Scholar
  9. 22.
    G. Feder, ‘On Exports and Economic Growth,’ Journal of Development Economics XII (1983) pp. 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 23.
    C. Michalopoulos, and K. Jay, ‘Growth of Exports and Income in the Developing World: A Neoclassical View,’ Discussion Paper No. 28, (Washington, DC: Agency for International Development, 1973).Google Scholar
  11. 25.
    B. Balassa, ‘Exports, Policy Choices, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries after the 1973 Oil Shock,’ Journal of Development Economics, XVIII (1985) pp. 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 27.
    B. Balassa and Associates, The Structure of Protection in Developing Countries (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971) p. 82.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    A. O. Krueger, ‘Some Economic Costs of Exchange Control: The Turkish Case,’ Journal of Political Economy, LXXIV (1966) pp. 466–80.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    J. de Melo, ‘Estimating the Cost of Protection: A General Equilibrium Approach,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, XCII (1978) p. 217. The results are 11.0 percent and 15.8 percent, respectively, postulating an optimal export tax for coffee, which is subject to an international agreement.Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    W. Grais, J. de Melo, and S. Urata, ‘A General Equilibrium Estimation of the Effects of Reductions in Tariffs and Quantitative Restrictions in Turkey in 1978,’ in T. N. Srinivasan and J. Whalley (eds), General Equilibrium Trade Policy Modeling (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986) p. 77.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    R. G. Harris with D. Cox, Trade, Industrial Policy, and Canadian Manufacturing (Toronto, Economic Council, 1983).Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    M. Nishimizu, and S. Robinson, ‘Trade Policies and Productivity Change in Semi-Industrialized Countries,’ Journal of Development Economics, XVI (1984), Table 5.Google Scholar
  18. 34.
    A. O. Krueger, and B. Tuncer, ‘An Empirical Test of the Infant Industry Argument,’ American Economic Review, LXXII (1982) pp. 1142–52.Google Scholar
  19. 35.
    I. J. Ahluwalia, Industrial Growth in India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  20. 36.
    H. B. Chenery, ‘Structural Chance,’ in H. B. Chenery, S. Robinson, and M. Syrquin (eds), Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986) Table 2.2.Google Scholar
  21. 41.
    T. E. Weisskopf, ‘The Impact of Foreign Capital Inflow on Domestic Savings in Underdeveloped Countries,’ Journal of International Economics, II (1972) pp. 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 42.
    G. Papanek, ‘Aid, Foreign Private Investment, Savings, and Growth in Less Developed Countries,’ Journal of Political Economy, LXXXI (1973) pp. 120–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 43.
    A. Maizels, Exports and Economic Growth in Developing Countries (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1968) Ch. 4.Google Scholar
  24. 44.
    J. N. Bhagwati, and T. N. Srinivasan, Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: India (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  25. 45.
    At the same time, one may agree with Bhagwati that ‘while there is much empirical evidence in support of a statistical association between exports and saving, there is little evidence so far for some of the hypotheses that could provide a rationale for such an association implying a causal relationship running from exports to savings.’ J. N. Bhagwati, Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1978) p. 147.Google Scholar
  26. 46.
    E. Grinols, and J. N. Bhagwati, ‘Foreign Capital Savings and Dependence,’ Review of Economics and Statistics, LVIII (1976) pp. 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 48.
    R. Banerji, and J. Riedel, ‘Industrial Employment Expansion under Alternative Trade Strategies: Case of India and Taiwan, 1950–1970,’ Journal of Development Economics, VII (1980) pp. 567–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 49.
    A. O. Krueger, Trade and Employment in Developing Countries. 3 Synthesis and Conclusions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983) Table 6.2.Google Scholar
  29. 51.
    G. S. Fields, ‘Employment, Income Distribution, and Economic Growth in Small Open Economies,’ Economic Journal,’ XCIV (1984) pp. 74–83.Google Scholar
  30. 52.
    J. L. Carvalho, and C. L. S. Haddad, ‘Foreign Trade Strategies and Employment in Brazil,’ in A. O. Krueger, M. B. Lary, T. Monson, and N. Akrasanee (eds), Trade and Employment in Developing Countries 1. Individual Studies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981) Table 2.15.Google Scholar
  31. 54.
    J. B. Behrman, ‘Country and Sectoral Variations in Manufacturing Elasticities of Substitution between Capital and Labor,’ in A. O. Krueger, (ed.), Trade and Employment in Developing Countries 2. Factor supply and Substitution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982) p. 186.Google Scholar
  32. 58.
    H. Myint, ‘Growth Policies and Income Distribution,’ Discussion Paper, Development Policy Issues Series, Report No. VPERS1 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1985).Google Scholar
  33. 59.
    S. S. Bhalla, and P. Glewwe, ‘Growth and Equity in Developing Countries: A Reinterpretation of the Sri Lankan Experience,’ World Bank Economic Review, I (1986) p. 61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bela Balassa 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bela Balassa
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Johns Hopkins UniversityUSA
  2. 2.The World BankUSA

Personalised recommendations