Skip to main content
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

Modern consciousness began, according to Richard Rorty, in the seventeenth century when Descartes invented the mind.1 The notorious Cartesian cogito, ‘I think, therefore I am’, led to a theory of knowledge based purely on mental processes and to an epistemology based on the separation of mind and world that have been the focus of philosophical debate for the last three centuries. This founding of all knowledge on the principle of ‘my own thinking existence’ has tended to dominate European and Anglo-Saxon thought, providing most of the images which govern our thinking about ourselves and our place in the scheme of things: self and object become separated into realms of ‘inner’ and ‘outer’; knowledge becomes a transaction between a ‘knowing subject’ and an external ‘reality’; mind becomes a mirror which reflects the world of nature (hence the importance of ocular metaphors in our claims to truth); the self becomes the centre of experience and potentially the governing principle in everything we perceive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton University Press, 1979), pp. 3–13, and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Lionel Stevenson, ‘The Key Poem in the Victorian Age’, in Essays in American and English Literature ‘Presented to’ Bruce Robert McElderry, Jr., ed. M. F. Schulz, W. D. Templeman and C. R. Metzger (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1967), pp. 260–89; Alba H. Warren, English Poetic Theory, 1825–1865 (Princeton University Press, 1950); Lawrence J. Starzyk, The Imprisoned Splendour: A Study of Victorian Critical Theory (London: Kennikat Press, 1977); Alan Sinfield’s excellent account of the role of poetry within a society governed by Victorian utilitarianism, in Alfred Tennyson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986); and David Shaw’s comprehensive study of poetic theory in the nineteenth century, The Lucid Veil: Poetic Truth in the Victorian Age (London: The Athlone Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. In The Lucid Veil, Shaw relates changing theories of language and knowledge to ideological attitudes. See also Howard W. Fulweiler, ‘Poetry and the Problem of Language’, in Letters from the Darkling Plain: Language and the Grounds of Knowledge in the Poetry of Arnold and Hopkins (University of Missouri Press, 1972), chap. 1. Philosophy has always tended to separate its reasoned truth-claims from the contaminations of poetic or figurative language, particularly before Nietzsche’s observations about the reliance of philosophy on metaphor and textuality. For a discussion of the present state of the conflict between analytical philosophy and literary theory, see Christopher Norris, The Contest of Faculties: Philosophy and Theory After Deconstruction (London: Methuen, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isobel Armstrong, Language as Living Form in Nineteenth-Century Poetry (Sussex: The Harvester Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. W. F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind, trans. with an Introduction and Notes by J. B. Baillie (1910, rev. 1931; New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1967), Preface, p. 94. Future references to this text will be documented internally by section and by page number.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Harland, Superstructuralism: The Philosophy of Structuralism and Post-Structuralism (London: Methuen, 1987), p. 72. Harland distinguishes between three traditions of philosophy: Anglo-Saxon empiricism; the ‘I’-philosophy of Descartes, Kant and Husserl; and the Metaphysical philosophy of Plato, Spinoza and Hegel (p. 70).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert C. Solomon, In the Spirit of Hegel: A Study of G. W. F. Hegel’s ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’ (Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 8. Hereafter cited as Solomon.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. J. Inwood’s book, Hegel (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), which appeared in the same year as Solomon’s work, offers a methodical study of the Hegelian system as a coherent whole; effectively this is to re-absorb Hegel into analytical discourse.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Robert C. Solomon, From Rationalism to Existentialism: The Existentialists and Their Nineteenth-Century Backgrounds (1972; rpt. Humanities Press/Harvester Press, 1978), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank Kermode’s discussion of the teleological structure of narrative in The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction (Oxford University Press, 1966) is of course well known.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972): ‘il n’y a pas de hors-texte’ (p. 158). The phrase is usually translated as ‘no outside-text’ or ‘no outside the text’; it should not be read in the manner of some literary critics as ‘nothing but the text’, as if it were a new critical slogan for pure formalism.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind: being Part Three of the ‘Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences’ (1830), translated by William Wallace, together with the ‘Zustze’ in Boumann’s text (1845), translated by A. V. Miller, with a Foreword by J. N. Findlay (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), p. viii. Hereafter cited as Mind.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Regel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies, trans. P. Christopher Smith (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1976), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example, Kris Davis, ‘Browning’s Caponsacchi: Stuck in the Gap,’ Victorian Poetry, vol. 25 (Spring 1987), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. All quotations from the ‘Epilogue’ are taken from Browning: Poetical Works 1833–1864, ed. Ian Jack (London: Oxford, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herbert F. Tucker Jr., Browning’s Beginnings (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980), pp. 185–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacques Derrida commenting on Kant’s aesthetic of pure mimesis, in ‘Economimesis’, Diacritics, vol. 11 (1981), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 E. Warwick Slinn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slinn, E.W. (1991). Consciousness as Self. In: The Discourse of Self in Victorian Poetry. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10452-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics