Skip to main content

Abstract

Political marketing employs a constellation of mediums: but television remains the supreme gift to politicians, with their presence assured in every home, and political marketing is largely a television activity. It is even employed in minor campaigns. According to David Garth, television ‘can take someone who’s relatively unknown and make him a visible factor’.

‘When he has been drawn out of his own sphere, therefore, he always expects that some amazing object will be offered to his attention; and it is on these terms alone that he consents to tear himself for a moment from the petty, complicated cares which form the charm and the excitement of his life.’

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Griese, N.H., ‘Rosser Reeves and the 1952 Eisenhower TV Spot Blitz’, Journal of Advertising, vol. 4, no. 4, Fall 1975, pp. 34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGinnis, Joe, The Selling of the President, 1968 (New York: Trident Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seymour-Ure, Colin, The American President: Power and Communication (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crotty, William J. and Jacobson, Gary C., American Parties in Decline (Boston and Toronto: Little Brown and Co., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sabato, Larry, The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections (New York: Basic Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blumenthal, Sidney, The Permanent Campaign (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nimmo, Dan, The Political Persuaders (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond, E. and Bates, S., New York, 1 October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perry, James M., The New Politics (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1968), pp. 116–17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diamond and Bates, New York, 1 October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. These examples from Edwin Diamond and Stephen Bates, ‘Hot Spots’, New York, 15 Feb. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ranney, Austin, Channels of Power (New York: Basic Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arterton, Christopher, ‘Communications Technology and Governance’, Dec. 1985, in Project on New Communications Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKay, David, American Politics and Society (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kristol, Irving, Two Cheers for Capitalism (New York: Basic Books, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Atkinson, Max, Our Masters’ Voices (London: Methuen, 1984), for discussion of range and subtlety of television’s demands; of the differences between a live and a televised performance style, and how oratory is ill-suited to television (pp. 175–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakshian, Aram, Winning the White House (Bolton: Ross Anderson Publications, 1984), for discussion of Mondale’s use of satellite (p. 94).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, James David, The Pulse of Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 1980) for discussion of candidate gaffes, particularly Carter and ‘ethnic purity’ (pp. 194–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, William M., Political Behaviour of the American Electorate (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1968, 1977), for discussion of how Kennedy defused the issue of his Catholicism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Godfrey, All things to all men (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984) for description of Lyndon Johnson’s difficulties with television (p. 176).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, Robert, The People Machine (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1968) for viewpoint on the triviality of television (pp. 35, 41); blandness of television news (pp. 39, 60); lack of serious social documentary coverage (pp.81, 82); inability to explore the ‘why’ factor (p. 57); television as escapism (pp. 13, 14); news as entertainment (p. 21); Nixon-Kennedy debates (pp. 168–72); Nixon’s telethon (p. 198); Kennedy’s campaign film (p. 200); anti-Goldwater commercials (pp. 207, 208).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldich, Anne Rowley, Electronic Democracy (New York: Praeger, 1979) for assertions about the political effects of television: claims that it hinders reasoned discussion (p. 42), weakens parties and conventions (p. 43) and makes democracy more cynical (p. 40).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Theodore H. The Making of the President 1964 (London: Jonathan Cape, 1965), for description of the Goldwater campaign’s non-mediable ranting aggression, its excellence at the administration level but poverty in the area of speechwriters, media men and so on.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Nicholas J. O’Shaughnessy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Shaughnessy, N.J. (1990). Television. In: The Phenomenon of Political Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10352-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics