Skip to main content
  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

Recall that by ‘soft’ goods we mean all consumer goods other than food and durables. Comparison is made difficult here, in addition to everything else, by different classifications in the statistics of the two countries.’ In Table 8.1 (as in Table 9.1 in Chapter 9) I first present figures for goods for which the classifications coincide, and then try to place similar subgroups of goods close to each other. Remember (Table 4.1) that according to the authors’ calculations, total Soviet per capita consumption as a percentage of American for this entire group is: in rubles — 32 per cent, in dollars — 48 per cent, and by the geometric mean — 39 per cent. I recommend that the reader examine carefully the indicators for expenditures on various goods in Table 8.1 and compare them with each other: they are interesting in themselves.

Per capita consumption of soft goods, 1976a

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. This norm is 3.6 pairs of leather footwear per year (V. F. Mayer, Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya SSSR, M., 1977, p. 105).

    Google Scholar 

  2. According to A. I. Levin, Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i lichnoye potrebleniye, M., 1979, p. 108, the norms for various regions range from 4.98 to 5.98 pairs. Apparently the latter norms pertain not only to leather shoes. See also Table 18.2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American footwear distinguishes 15 widths (from A to EEE) and Soviet, three (A. M. Kochurov and K. A. Karanyan, Spravochnik prodavtsa promyshlennykh tovarov, M., 1974, p. 51), but I personally could not usually find shoes of large width in Soviet stores.

    Google Scholar 

  4. US Bureau of the Census, C.I.R, Shoes and Slippers …, 1976, MA-31A(76)–1, p. 8. This 786.5 m. pairs is formed as follows: production of 422.5, exports of 6 m., and imports of 370 m. The cited source includes a lot of varied information on footwear produced in the country, and very much is said about imports.

    Google Scholar 

  5. US Bureau of the Census, Social Indicators III, 1980, pp. 556, 561–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Igor Birman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birman, I. (1989). Soft Goods. In: Personal Consumption in the USSR and the USA. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10349-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics