Abstract
Literary critics interpret texts. By and large they get on without worrying too much about the inexplicit theories or principles that underwrite their practice. Some of them very actively resist the idea that such theories can be found, or that bringing them to light could serve any useful purpose. At its most obscurantist this attitude takes the Leavisian form of a downright refusal to engage in such discussion. Elsewhere distinctions are drawn between ‘theory’ and ‘principle’, the latter conceived as a realm of tacit values and assumptions beyond reach of further analysis. At a more philosophical level, the issue is joined by those in the ‘hermeneutic’ camp who argue that each and every act of understanding is embedded in a context of cultural meanings and presuppositions which can never be exhausted by rational explanation.l From this point of view there is simply no appeal to a higher ‘theoretical’ order of knowledge independent of cultural conditioning. To interpret a text is to enter, willingly or not, into the ‘hermeneutic circle’ which constitutes the basis of all understanding. Theory is deluded if it thinks to get a hold upon texts from some ideal vantage-point of pure disinterested knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See especially Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, trans. and ed. Garrett Barden and John Cumming (London, 1975).
See Jürgen Habermas, Theory and Practice, trans. John Viertel (London, 1974).
See Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy (London, 1979).
See the essays collected in Richard Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis, Minn., 1982).
Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism, p. 72.
Ibid., p. 74.
Ibid., p. xx.
Ibid., p. 73.
Ibid., p. 78.
Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction (Oxford, 1983) p. vii.
Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism, p. 87.
Ibid., p. 89.
Paul de Man, ‘The Resistance to Theory’, in Barbara Johnson (ed.), The Pedagogical Imperative (Yale French Studies 63, 19821 pp. 3–20.
Rorty, Consequences of PraAmatism, p. 112.
Paul de Man, ‘The Resistance to Theory’, p. 11.
Ibid., p. 11.
Ibid., p. 8.
See Paul de Man, ‘Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant’, in Hermeneutics: Questions and Prospects, ed. Gary Shapiro and Alan Sica (Amherst, Mass., 1984) pp. 121–44.
De Man, ‘The Resistance to Theory’. p. 11.
Roger Scruton, The Aesthetic Understanding (London. 1983) p. 8.
T. S. Eliot, ‘The Metaphysical Poets’, in Selected Essays (London, 1964) pp. 241–50, p. 247.
See T. S. Eliot, The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism (London, 1946) p. 156.
See T. S. Eliot, ‘The Perfect Critic’, in The Sacred Wood (London, 1928) pp. 1–16.
T. S. Eliot, ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’, in Selected Essays, pp. 3–11.
De Man, ‘Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant’, p. 124.
Ibid., p. 140.
Jean-Francois Lyotard, The Post-Mo dern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi (Minneapolis, Minn., 1983).
Ibid., p. 64.
Ibid., p. 65.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Rajnath
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norris, C. (1989). Philosophy, Theory and the ‘Contest of Faculties’: Saving Deconstruction from the Pragmatists. In: Rajnath (eds) Deconstruction: A Critique. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10335-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10335-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-10337-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10335-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)