Skip to main content

Human Rights and Culture Change

  • Chapter
Human Rights

Part of the book series: Policy Studies Organization Series ((PSOS))

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

A historical bias toward cultural relativism has led to a general unwillingness by anthropologists to deal with questions of human rights. A descriptive science, anthropology is concerned with the various lifeways of humans, eschewing value judgements. Thus, anthropologists face something of a dilemma in developing a concept of universal morality. Some attention has been given to possible moral universals, such as the incest taboo and strictures on in-group assault and homicide. While these moral precepts approach universality, incest and homicide receive positive sanction in specific situations in societies. Likewise, while rape, for example, is one of the most heavily sanctioned crimes cross-culturally (Brown, 1952), institutionalized rape is not uncommon as a punitive or ritual cultural practice (Webster, 1979).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABDALLA, R. H. D. (1982) Sisters in Affliction: Circumcision and Infibulation of Women in Africa (London: Zed Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCHENBRENNER, Joyce (1967) Endogamy and Social Status in a West Punjabi Village. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARDENER, Edwin (1975) ‘Belief and the Problem of Women’, in S. Ardener (ed.), Perceiving Women, pp. 1–17 (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-DEAN, Virginia Lee (1985) ‘Clitoridectomy and Infibulation’, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 9: 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENEDICT, Ruth (1938) ‘Continuities and Discontinuities in Cultural Conditioning’, Psychiatry, 1: 161–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • BODLEY, John H. (1982) Victims of Progress, 2nd edn (Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin-Cummings).

    Google Scholar 

  • BONFIL BATALLA, Guilermo (1966) ‘Conservative Thought in Applied Anthropology: A Critique’, Human Organization, 25: 126–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, J. S. (1952) ‘A Comparative Study of Deviations from Sexual Mores’, American Sociological Review, 17: 135–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BUTALIA, Urvashi (1985) ‘Indian Women and the New Movement’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 8: 131–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN (1983), in House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights Documents. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, pp. 139–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAHRENDORF, Rolf (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, Marvin (1979) Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, Rose Oldfield (1975) ‘Female Genital Mutilation, Fertility Control, Women’s Roles, and the Patrilineage in Modern Sudan: A Functional Analysis’, American Ethnologist, 2: 617–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HENRY, Jules (1963) Culture Against Man (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • HOSKEN, Fran P. (1979) The Hosken Report, 2nd edn (Lexington, Mass.: Women’s International Network News).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAQUET, Jacques (1964) ‘Objectivity in anthropology’, Current Anthropology, 5: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw (1960) A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays (New York: Oxford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARIOTTI, A. and MAGUBANE, B. (1978) ‘Urban Ethnology in Africa: Some Theoretical Issues’, in J. Aschenbrenner and L. Collins (eds), Processes of Urbanism: A Multidisciplinary Approach, pp. 45–68 (The Hague: Mouton).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERSPECTIVE: UN DECADE FOR WOMEN, 1976–1986. UN Chronicle, 22: i–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROGERS, Susan (1975) ‘Female Forms of Power and the Myth of Male Dominance: A Model of Female/Male Interaction in Peasant Society’, American Ethnologist, 2: 727–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROGERS, Susan C. (1978) ‘Woman’s Place: A Critical Review of Anthropological Theory’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20: 123–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RADIN, Paul, (ed.) (1926) Crashing Thunder: The Autobiography of an Indian (New York: D. Appleton & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAPIR, Edward (1924) ‘Culture, genuine and spurious’, American Journal of Sociology, 29: 401–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHARMA, Ursula (1984) ‘Dowry in North India’, in Renée Hirschon (ed.), Women and Property, Women as Property (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • STEADY, Filmena Chioma (1985) ‘African Women at the End of the Decade’, Africa Report, 30: 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOURÉ, Sékou (1973) ‘A Dialectical Approach to Culture’, in R. Chrisman and N. Hares (eds), Contemporary Black Thought, pp. 3–25 (New York: Bobbs-Merrill).

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, Laura (1950) Culture in Crisis: A Study of the Hopi Indians (New York: Harper & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • WEBSTER, Paula (1979) ‘Politics of Rape in Primitive Societies’, Heresies, 2: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aschenbrenner, J. (1988). Human Rights and Culture Change. In: Cingranelli, D.L. (eds) Human Rights. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10122-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics