Abstract
One widely recognized method of constraining the abuse of coercion by the state is due process, which requires that the government does not deny or remove an individual’s property or freedom without showing cause and following proper legal procedures. The strategy of due process is to ‘present formidable impediments’ to the state’s use of force against its citizens (Packer, 1968, p. 163). Due process is the most fundamental right of free people because it is the primary mechanism through which all other individual rights and liberties are protected from encroachment by the government. In a seminal work, Packer (1968) presented two models of the judicial system representing competing value systems. The central value of his ‘crime control’ model was the repression of criminal conduct. A judicial system incorporating crime control values would operate in a way that would be analogous to an assembly line. The movement from arrest to incarceration would be efficient; though some innocent persons might be punished, few guilty persons would go free. The central value of the ‘due process’ model was protection of individual rights and liberties from violation by the state. If the crime control model resembled an assembly line, the due process model resembled an obstacle course.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ALI, B. (1969) Treatment of Prisoners in Nine Nations: A Pilot Study on Standard Minimum Rules’, Criminologica, 7: 2–18.
BECKER, T. L. (1970) Comparative Judicial Politics (Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally).
BOLI-BENNETT, J. (1981) ‘Human Rights or State Expansion: Cross-National Definitions of Constitutional Rights, 1870–1970’, in Ved P. Nanda, James R. Scarrett and George W. Shepherd, Jr. (eds), Global Human Rights: Public Policies, Comparative Measures, and NGO Strategies, pp. 289–304 (Boulder, Co.: Westview Press).
CAPPELLETTI, M. and GARTH, B. (1978) Access to Justice: A World Survey (Milan, Italy: Sijthoff and Noordhoff Publishing Company).
CINGRANELLI, D. L. and WRIGHT, K. N. (1985) ‘A Comparison of National Criminal Justice Practices’, Journal of Crime and Justice, 8: 93–114.
CINGRANELLI, D. L. and PASQUARELLO, T. N. (1985) ‘Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of US Foreign Aid Among Latin American Countries’, The American Journal of Political Science, 29: 539–63.
DAVID, R. and BRIERLY, J. E. C. (1978) Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law (London: Stevens and Sons).
DAVIS, K. C. (1971) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press).
DAVIS, K. C. (1976) Discretionary Justice in Europe and America (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press).
DOLESCHAL, E. (1977) ‘Race and Length of Imprisonment: How Does the US Compare with the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden’, Crime and Delinquency, 23: 51–6.
DUCHACEK, I. D. (1973) Rights and Liberties in the World Today (Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio).
DURKHEIM, E. (1958) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (Glencoe: The Free Press).
FRIEDMAN, L. M. (1969) ‘Legal Cultures and Social Development’, Law and Society Review, 4, 1: 29–44.
GALTUNG, J. (1971) ‘A Structural Theory of Imperialism’, Journal of Peace Research, 8: 81–113.
GASTIL, R. (1980) ‘The Comparative Survey of Freedom’, Freedom at Issue 54: 3–14.
KRISLOV, S. and KVAVIK, R. B. (1984) ‘Political Development and Emergent Theories of Legal Evolution’. Paper presented at the 1984 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
KURIAN, G. (1982) Book of World Rankings (New York, NY: Facts on File).
PACKER, H. (1968) Limits of the Criminal Sanction (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press).
POUND, R. (1942) Social Control Through Law (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).
OUINNEY, R. (1969) Crime and Justice in Society (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown).
ROSH, B. (1987) ‘Ethnic Cleavage as a Component of Global Militarization’, Journal of Peace Research, 24, 1: 21–30.
SCHMIDHAUSER, J. R. (1982) ‘The Circulation of Judicial Elites: A Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective’, in Moshe M. Czudnowski (ed.), Does Who Governs Matter? (De Kalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois University Press).
SCHOULTZ, L. (1980) ‘U.S. Foreign Policy and Human Rights’, Comparative Politics, 13: 149–70.
SCHUBERT, G. (1968) ‘Ideological Distance: A Smallest Space Analysis Across Three Cultures’, Comparative Political Studies, 1: 319–50.
SCHUBERT, G. and DANELSKI, D. J. (1969) Comparative Judicial Behavior (New York: Oxford University Press).
SKOLER, D. L. (1975) World Implementation of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Treatment of Prisoners (Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commission on Correctional Facilities and Services).
STEPHENS, O. H. (1976) ‘Equal Justice and Counsel Rights in the United States and Canada’, in Richard P. Claude (ed.) Comparative Human Rights, pp. 161–83 (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press).
STRAUSE, J. C. and CLAUDE, R. P. (1976) ‘Empirical Comparative Rights Research: Some Preliminary Tests of Development Hypotheses’, in Richard P. Claude (ed.), Comparative Human Rights (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press).
TIGAR, M. E. and LEVY, M. R. (1977) Law and the Rise of Capitalism (New York: Monthly Review Press).
US DEPARTMENT OF STATE (1981) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).
WEBER, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Glencoe: The Free Press).
WRIGHT, K. N. and CINGRANELLI, D. L. (1985) ‘Inhumane, Cruel, and Degrading Treatment of Criminal Prisoners Throughout the World’, Justice Quarterly, 2, 3: 345–62.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cingranelli, D.L., Wright, K.N. (1988). Correlates of Due Process. In: Cingranelli, D.L. (eds) Human Rights. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10122-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10122-1_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-10124-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10122-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)