Abstract
Although it is now generally accepted in democracies that propaganda has become a major requisite of modern warfare, it is less well appreciated that propaganda has in fact become no less essential to the maintenance of peace, power and prestige. Britain, the pioneer of modern war propaganda techniques,1 has always remained squeamish and sceptical about the peacetime employment of state propaganda, but the phenomenon of Britain’s decline from being the only global great power at the start of the century to its present position would, if anything, appear to merit a more positive and enthusiastic approach, particularly to overseas propaganda or ‘national projection’. Certainly, as the 1954 Drogheda Enquiry into the Overseas Information Services recognised:
Propaganda is no substitute for policy: nor should it be regarded as a substitute for military strength, economic efficiency or financial stability. Propaganda may disguise weakness, but the assertion of strength will deceive nobody unless the strength is there.2
Propaganda may indeed fail ultimately to disguise weakness or the realities of decline but it can provide an illusion of strength and confidence that does serve to aid foreign policy objectives in effective short-term ways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
M.L. Sanders and Philip M. Taylor, British propaganda during the first world war (Macmillan 1982 ).
F. Hardy (ed.), Grier on on Documentary (Collins, 1946) p. 170. My italics.
A. Ponsonby, Falsehood in Wartime (London: 1928) p. 18.
Philip M. Taylor, ‘British official attitudes towards propaganda abroad, 1918–39’ in N. Pronay and D.W. Spring (eds), Propaganda, Politics and Film, 1918–45 (Macmillan, 1981).
Philip M. Taylor, The Projection of Britain: British overseas publicity and propaganda,1919–39 (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
F. Donaldson, The British Council: the first fifty years (Cape, 1984) p. 132.
See also R. McMurray and M. Lee, The Cultural Approach another way in international relations (University of North Carolina Press, 1947)
A. Haigh, Cultural Diplomacy in Europe (Council of Europe, 1974).
W. Clark, ‘Cabinet secrecy, collective responsibility and the British public’s Right to Know and participate in British foreign policy’ in T.M. Franck and E. Weisband (eds), Secrecy and Foreign Policy (Oxford University Press, 1974 ) p. 207.
Yoel Cohen, Media Diplomacy: the Foreign Office in the mass communications age (Cass, 1986) p. 93.
Sir F. Clark, The Central Office of Information ( Allen & Unwin, 1970) p. 172.
J.C.W. Reith, Into the Wind ( Hodder amp; Stoughton, 1949 ) p. 354.
T. Barman, Diplomatic Correspondent (Hamish Hamilton, 1968) p. 192.
W.K. Wark, ‘Coming in from the Cold: British propaganda and Red Army defectors, 1945–52’, International History Review, 9 (1987) 1, 48–72.
C. Anstey, ‘The Projection of British Socialism: Foreign Office publicity and American Opinion, 1945–50’, Journal of Contemporary History, 19 (1984) 3, pp. 417–51.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Michael Dockrill and John W. Young
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, P.M. (1989). The Projection of Britain Abroad, 1945–51. In: Dockrill, M., Young, J.W. (eds) British Foreign Policy, 1945–56. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10078-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10078-1_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-10080-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10078-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)