Abstract
The Monetarist view is that the four strands of budgetary policy — monetary, fiscal, interest rate and credit policy — ought not to be regarded as a basis for manipulating the behaviour of economic agents. The argument is that microeconomic principles show the effectiveness of market forces in achieving an efficient allocation of resources; and that these considerations are not compromised by any wider consideration, macroeconomic in kind. In particular, Friedman has argued that by seeking to keep monetary disturbances to a minimum,
steady monetary growth would provide a monetary climate favourable to the effective operation of those basic forces of enterprise, ingenuity, invention, hard work and thrift that are the true springs of economic growth. (Friedman, 1968, p. 17)
The only way to avoid being driven by continuing inflation into a controlled and directed economy, and therefore ultimately in order to save civilisation, will be to deprive governments of their power over the supply of money. (Hayek, 1978, p. 129)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 G.R. Steele
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steele, G.R. (1989). Control of the Money Supply. In: Monetarism and the Demise of Keynesian Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09994-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09994-8_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09996-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09994-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)