Topological Representations for Machine Tool Structures

  • G. Q. Huang
  • J. A. Brandon


The implementation of Computer Integrated Manufacturing depends on the matching of component demands to machine capabilities. historically the emphasis has been on characterisation of components, for example the recent work by Pratt.

The paper develops machine representation models originated by Ito et al. These strategies provide a practical method of classifying existing machines but are of much more limited use in design synthesis for specification of new machines. A more general model, the Graphical Machine Representation Model, is discussed in the paper. The analysis is based on graph theory and considers the structure of the design database for knowledge based machine design strategies.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M PRATT, 1985, SERC ACME CAPP workshop, UMIST.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G Q HUANG and J A BRANDON, 1987, Graphical information representation and processing model with application to knowledge based integrated machine tool design systems, UWIST Tech Note, EP 122Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y ITO and H SHINNO, 1982, Structural description and similarity evaluation of the structural configuration in machine tools, Int J MTDR. 22(2), pp97-110.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y ITO, 1984, Description of machine tools and its applications-CAD system for machine tool structures, Bull JSPE, 18(2).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y ITO and Y SAITO, 1981, computer-aided draughting system ‘ALODS’ for machine tool structures, Proc 22nd MTDR. Manchester. pp69-76.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y ITO and H SHINNO, 1984, Generating method for structural configuration of machine tools, Tr JSME, 50(449), pp213-7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ITO and H SHINNO, 1984, A proposed generating method for the structural configuration of machine tools, ASME paper 84-WA/Prod-22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N OKINO et al, 1977, TIPS-2: an integrated CAD/CAM system, in Advances in Computer Aided Manufacture. Ed MoPherson, North Holland, pp385-395.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N OKINO et al, 1983, TIPS-Technical Information Processing System for CAD/ CAM, JARECT7, Ed Kitagawa, PP204-223.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K KITAJIMA and H YOSHIKAWA, 1984, HIMADES-1: a hierarchical machine design system based on the structure model for a — machine, Computer Aided Design, 16(6) pp299-307.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D N ROCHELEAU and K W LEE, 1987, System for interactive assembly modelling, Computer Aided Design, 19(20), pp65-72.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D C GOSSARD and K W LEE, 1985, A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: part 1, Computer Aided Design, 17(1), pp15-19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K W LEE and G ANDREWS 1985, Inference of components in an assembly: part 2, Computer Aided Design, 17(1), pp21-24.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K IWATA et al, 1981, An analytical approach to machine tool design, Tr JSME, 47(418), PP793-802.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M HARDWICK and D L SPOONER, 1987, Comparison of some datamodels for engineering objects, IEEE Comp Graph Applns, 7(3) PP56-66.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A K HOPE, 1986, Mechanical CAE system design databases, Computer Aided Engg, 3(6), PP235-239.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N S LEE, 1986, Programming with P-Shell, IEEE Expert System, pp50-63.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P HARMON and D KING, 1985, Expert Systems-Artificial Intelligence in Business, John Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Q. Huang
    • 1
  • J. A. Brandon
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Mechanical and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringUniversity of Wales Institute of Science and TechnologyCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations