Skip to main content

Conclusion: Did the Enlightenment Matter?

  • Chapter
The Enlightenment

Part of the book series: Studies in European History ((SEURH))

  • 312 Accesses

Abstract

Many vociferous reactionary ideologues during the 1790s blamed all the evils of the French Revolution, as they saw them, upon the philosophes. For Burke, as for the Abbé Barruel, the ‘illuminati’ had been visionaries drunk upon reason; their speciously attractive, pseudo-humanitarian projects and facile rhetoric had charmed the impressionable, and fatally undermined the status quo. The antagonists of the Enlightenment could certainly point to erstwhile philosophes who were deeply caught up in French Revolutionary politics. When Condorcet died in the Terror, and the democrat author of The Age of Reason, Tom Paine, narrowly escaped with his life, it was easy to imply that radical chickens were finally coming home to roost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Roy Porter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Porter, R. (1990). Conclusion: Did the Enlightenment Matter?. In: The Enlightenment. Studies in European History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09885-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09885-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-45414-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09885-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics