A European Defence Entity: European Institutions and Defence
European defence cooperation of any consequence cannot consist solely of a series of bilateral, trilateral, and even quadrilateral activities, although these (which can include ministerial meetings, developing weapons systems collaboratively and joint troop training) may be of considerable importance. There is a need for activities to be coordinated, for priorities and needs to be indentified in wider fora and for a public image of West European defence cooperation to be developed. Thus some organized multilateral institutions for European defence cooperation must be available and several have emerged over the past 30 years or more. However, just which organizations and bodies should undertake which precise tasks is neither settled nor readily apparent. It is with this broad issue that this chapter is concerned.
KeywordsEurope Coherence Assure Turkey Defend
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Facts and Figures, Brussels, NATO, 10th ed, 1981, pp. 46–51; and J. M. Stewart, ‘NATO Force Planning: Conventional Force Improvements’, Armed Forces, 5, 8 (August 1986), pp. 352–4.Google Scholar
- 6.Commission of the European Community, Action Programme for the European Aeronautical Sector, EC Bulletin Supplement 11/75, Brussels 3 October 1975.Google Scholar
- 9.Summarized in ‘Security and Armaments’. For firm endorsement of the Klepsch and Fergusson Reports, see J. C. Rallo, Defending Europe in the 1990s: The New Divide of High Technology (London: Frances Pinter, 1986).Google Scholar
- 16.See Trevor Taylor in The World Today, May 1987 (London: Royal Institute for International Affairs), pp. 76–7.Google Scholar
- 24.See T. Taylor, European Defence Cooperation, Chatham House Paper No. 24 (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs and Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), pp. 7–18. See Rallo, Defending Europe, for a vigorous integration of economic and security cooperation issues.Google Scholar