Skip to main content

Comment on ‘A European SACEUR?’

  • Chapter
  • 8 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in International Security ((SIS))

Abstract

For every solution there is a problem, General de Gaulle is supposed to have said. Sir James Eberle’s chapter outlines the mish-mash of command arrangements that history and national jealousies have bequeathed to NATO, and he does so with the feeling of someone who has actually had to try to make those arrangements work. Although the idea of a European SACEUR has been put forward before (by Henry Kissinger among others)1 Eberle’s experience dictates that the argument deserves especially careful scrutiny. Yet still neither Eberle nor Kissinger seems to have identified in convincing fashion a problem to which a European SACEUR is the solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Jonathan Alford (late Deputy Director, IISS)Kenneth Hunt (former Deputy Director, IISS)

Copyright information

© 1988 International Institute for Strategic Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Treverton, G.F. (1988). Comment on ‘A European SACEUR?’. In: Alford, J., Hunt, K. (eds) Europe in the Western Alliance. Studies in International Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09837-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics