Advertisement

Casual Commitment in International Relations

  • Inis L. ClaudeJr

Abstract

In late June, 1980, the new Secretary of State of the United States, Edmund Muskie, flew from Europe to a meeting of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. En route, he read a draft prepared by his subordinates for him to deliver at the meeting. Referring to the recent invasion of Thailand by Vietnam, the text asserted that the United States would abide by its security commitments. When the secretary asked what his government intended to do in support of Thailand, he was startled to learn that no plans had been made. He then proclaimed his distaste for mouthing empty rhetoric and insisted that ‘if there isn’t any substance to this, I am not going to say the words’. Urgent messages to Washington stimulated officials to develop a program of aid which, thanks to the magic of radio, Muskie was able to announce soon after his plane landed.

Keywords

United States International Relation Global System World Order Collective Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Don Oberdorfer, ‘U.S. To Rush More Aid to Thailand’, Washington Post, 28 June 1980;Google Scholar
  2. and ‘Muskie Rejects Shopworn Diplomacy’, Washington Post, 29 June 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    US Congress, Senate, Congressional Record, 79th Congress, 1st session, 23 July 1945, 91, pt. 5:7962.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Harry S. Truman, Memoirs. Vol. 2, Years of Trial and Hope (Garden City, NY, 1956) pp. 106, 250.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    J. William Fulbright, The Vietnam Hearings (New York, 1966) p. 42.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Walter Lippmann, U.S. Foreign Policy: Shield of the Republic (Boston, 1943) pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lippmann, Washington Post, 9 February 1969.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Walter Lippmann, Early Writings (New York, 1970) pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    Theodore Marburg and Horace E. Flack (eds) Taft Papers on League of Nations (New York, 1920) p. 76.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Henry Cabot Lodge, The Senate and the League of Nations (New York, 1925) p. 244.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    See George W. Egerton, Great Britain and the Creation of the League of Nations (Chapel Hill, NC, 1978).Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Warren F. Kuehl, Seeking World Order: The United States and International Organization to 1920 (Nashville, Tenn., 1969) pp. 342–3.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    See Nicholas’s paper in Arthur S. Link (ed.) Woodrow Wilson and a Revolutionary World, 1913–1921 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1982).Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    Ray S. Baker and W. E. Dodd (eds) The Public Papers of Woodrow Wilson: War and Peace, vol. 2 (New York, 1927) p. 505.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (New York, 1920) pp. 42–3.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    Harold Nicolson, Peacemaking 1919 (London, 1964) pp. 164, 184, 196–204.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    Quoted in Paul Mantoux, Paris Peace Conference 1919, Proceedings of the Council of Four (Geneva, 1964) p. 93.Google Scholar
  18. 35.
    Richard Cohen, ‘They’re Making It Illegal to Break a Promise’, Washington Post, 10 August 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Inis L. Claude, Jr 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inis L. ClaudeJr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations