Skip to main content

Model Fitting in Communism Studies

  • Chapter
Politics and the Soviet System

Abstract

The interaction between political theory and area studies in the last several decades has taken the form of model fitting — crude, clumsy, and, sometimes sanguine at the outset, increasingly deft and experimental as time went on and experience accumulated. Soviet, East European (and now Chinese) political studies, of all area studies, have been more open to this model fitting process. This may very well be due to the scarcity of data about communist societies, and the effort to enhance insight through experimenting with different theoretical perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Giovanni Sartori, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review 64:3 (December 1970) p. 1034.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leonard Binder, ‘The Natural History of Development Theory’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 28:1 (January 1986) p. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giovanni Sartori (ed.) Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karl Deutsch, The Nerves of Government (New York: Free Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Orr, ‘Reflections on Totalitarianism, Leading to Reflections on Two Ways of Theorizing’, Political Studies 21:4 (December 1973), p. 481;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. also see Abbott Gleason, ‘Totalitarianism in 1984’, Russian Review 43:2 (April 1984) pp. 145–60, for a review of the origins of the concept.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlton J. H. Hayes, ‘The Novelty of Totalitarianism in the History of Western Civilization’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (Philadelphia, Pa., 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1951, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  9. and Carl J. Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1956, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Merle Fainsod, How Russia is Ruled (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leonard Schapiro, The Communist Party of the Soviet Union (New York: Vintage, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. L. Talmon, Political Messianism: The Romantic Phase (New York: Praeger, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bertram D. Wolfe, Three Who Made a Revolution (Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1948);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Permanent Purge — Politics in Soviet Totalitarianism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1956);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. John A. Armstrong, Ideology, Politics and Government in the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Allen Kassof, ‘The Administered Society; Totalitarianism Without Terror’, World Politics 16:4 (July 1964) p. 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carl J. Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1956);

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frederic J. Fleron, Jr., ‘Soviet Area Studies and the Social Sciences: Some Methodological Problems in Communist Studies’, in Fleron, Communist Studies and the Social Sciences: Essays in Methodology and Empirical Theory (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Benjamin Barber, ‘Conceptual Foundations of Totalitarianism’, in C. J. Friedrich (ed.) Totalitarianism in Perspective (New York: Praeger, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jeremy Azrael, ‘Varieties of Destalinization’, in Chalmers Johnson (ed.) Change in Communist Systems (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Juan J. Linz, ‘Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes’ in Greenstein and Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1975) vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Soviet Bloc: Unity and Conflict (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  24. James R. Townsend, Politics in China (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lucian Pye (ed.) Political Science and Area Studies (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  26. George Breslauer, Five Images of the Soviet Future (Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of International Studies, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barrington Moore, Terror and Progress, USSR (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1954).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Daniel Bell, ‘Ten Theories in Search of Reality: The Prediction of Soviet Behavior in the Social Sciences’, World Politics 10:3 (April 1958) pp. 327–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alex Inkeles, ‘Models and Issues in the Analysis of Soviet Society’, Survey 60 (July 1968), pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ernest A. Menze (ed.) Totalitarianism Reconsidered (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1981);

    Google Scholar 

  31. and Stephen J. Whitfield, Into the Dark: Hannah Arendt and Totalitarianism (Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Frederick C. Barghoorn, Politics in the USSR (Boston: Little, Brown, 1966, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frederick C. Barghoorn and Thomas F. Remington, Politics in the USSR (Boston: Little, Brown, 1986), pp. 18–19;

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jerry Hough and Merle Fainsod, How the Soviet Union Is Governed (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979) p. 518;

    Google Scholar 

  35. and James R. Townsend, Politics in China (Boston: Little, Brown, 1974, 1980, 1986) pp. 191–5.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leonard Schapiro, Totalitarianism (New York: Praeger, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Juan J. Linz, ‘Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes’, in Greenstein and Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1975) vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fainsod, How Russia Is Ruled; Merle Fainsod, How Russia is Ruled, rev. edn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Barrington Moore, Soviet Politics: The Dilemma of Power (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  40. John Hazard, The Soviet System of Government (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1957);

    Google Scholar 

  41. John A. Armstrong; Ideology, Politics and Government in the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1962);

    Google Scholar 

  42. Adam Ulam, The New Face of Soviet Totalitarianism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. David Easton, The Political System (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1953);

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. D. Lasswell, The Decision Process (Bureau of Governmental Research, University of Maryland, 1956);

    Google Scholar 

  45. and Gabriel A. Almond, ‘Comparative Political Systems’, Journal of Politics 18:3 (August 1956) pp. 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. James R. Townsend, Politics in China (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1974, 1980, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mary McAuley, Politics and the Soviet Union (New York: Penguin, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  48. David Lane, Politics and Society in the USSR (New York: New York University Press, 1978) p. xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  49. David Lane, State and Politics in the USSR (New York: New York University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stephen White et al., Communist Political Systems (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Georg Brunner, Politische Soziologie der USSR (Wiesbaden, Akademische Gesellschaft, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Daniel Tarschys, The Soviet Political Agenda: Problems and Priorities. 1950–1970 (White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. T. H. Rigby, Communist Party Membership in the USSR. 1917–1967 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gabriel A. Almond and G. Bingham Powell, Jr., Comparative Politics: System, Process and Policy, 2nd edn (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  55. Judith May and Aaron Wildavsky, The Policy Cycle (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Arnold Horelick, Ross A. Johnson and John D. Steinbruner, The Study of Soviet Foreign Policy: Decision Theory Related Approaches (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  57. William Potter, ‘Sources of Foreign Policy Change: Insights from the Policy Sciences’, Conference on the Domestic Sources of Soviet Foreign Policy, UCLA Project on Politics and War, 11 Oct., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vernon V. Aspaturian, ‘The Soviet Decision-makers: Where, How, and By Whom Decisions Are Made’, UCLA Project on Politics and War, 10–11 Oct., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Richard Fagen, The Transformation of Political Culture in Cuba (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Robert Tucker, ‘Culture, Political Culture, and Communist Society’, Political Science Quarterly 88:2 (June 1973) pp. 173–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. and Stephen White, Political Culture in Soviet Politics (London: Macmillan, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. Archie Brown, ‘Conclusions’, in Archie Brown (ed.) Political Culture and Communist Studies (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1985) p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Richard Fagen, The Transformation of Political Culture in Cuba (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1969); Robert C. Tucker, ‘Culture, Political Culture, and Communist Society’;

    Google Scholar 

  64. Archie Brown and Jack Gray, Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States, 2nd edn (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1979);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  65. Archie Brown, Political Culture and Communist Studies (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1985); Jack Gray, ‘Conclusions’, in Brown and Gray (eds) Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States; Mary McAuley, ‘Political Culture and Communist Politics: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back’, in Brown (ed.) Political Culture and Communist Studies;

    Google Scholar 

  66. Stephen White, ‘Political Culture in Communist States: Some Problems of Theory and Method’, Comparative Politics 16:3 (April 1984) pp. 351–65;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. and Gabriel A. Almond, ‘Communism and Political Culture Theory’, Comparative Politics 15:2 (January 1983) pp. 127–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Barghoorn and Remington, Politics in the USSR (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  69. and Theodore Friedgut, Political Participation in the USSR (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wayne Di Franceisco and Zvi Gitelman, ‘Soviet Political Culture and “Covert Participation” in Policy Implementation’, American Political Science Review 78:3 (September 1984) pp. 603–21;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. and Sidney Verba and Norman Nie, Participation in America (New York: Harper and Row, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel P. Huntington, Political Power, USA/USSR (New York: Viking, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Karl Deutsch, ‘Social Mobilization and Political Development’, American Political Science Review 55:3 (September 1961) pp. 493–514;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Seymour Martin Lipset, ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political 53:1 (January 1959) pp. 69–105;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. James Coleman, ‘Conclusion: The Political Systems of the Developing Areas’, in Gabriel A. Almond and James Coleman (eds) The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  76. and Alex Inkeles and David Smith, Becoming Modern (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. Jan F. Triska and Paul M. Cocks (eds) Political Development in Eastern Europe (New York: Praeger, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Samuel P. Huntington, ‘Social and Institutional Dynamics of OneParty Systems’, in Samuel Huntington and Clement Moore, Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic Books, 1970) pp. 3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Richard Lowenthal, ‘Development vs. Utopia in Communist Policy’, in Chalmers Johnson (ed.) Change in Communist Systems (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1970), p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kenneth Jowitt, The Leninist Response to National Dependency (Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of International Studies, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kenneth Jowitt, ‘Soviet Neotraditionalism’, Soviet Studies 35:3 (July 1983) pp. 275–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Andrew Janos, Politics and Paradigms (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1986) p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Otto Hintze, Staat and Verfassung (Gottingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  84. and Charles Tilly, The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Hugh Heclo, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden (New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univeristy Press, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  86. and Peter Flora and Arnold Heidenheimer (eds) The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  87. George Breslauer, Five Images of the Soviet Future (Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of International Studies, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Robert A. Dahl, Polyarchy (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Otto Gierke, Political Theories of the Middle Ages (Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press, 1900);

    Google Scholar 

  90. John Neville Figgis, The Churches in the Modern State (London, 1913);

    Google Scholar 

  91. Leon Duguit, Traite de Droit Constitutionnel (Paris: Boccard, 1925);

    Google Scholar 

  92. Harold Laski, Studies in the Problem of Sovereignty (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1917);

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ernest Barker, Political Thought in England from Herbert Spencer to the Present Day (London: Williams and Norgate, 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Arthur Bentley, The Process of Government (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1908);

    Google Scholar 

  95. and Mary Parker Follett, The New State, Group Organization and the Solution of Popular Government (New York: Longmans, Green, 1918).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Suzanne Berger (ed.) Organizing Interests in Western Europe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957);

    Google Scholar 

  97. John Manley, ‘Neopluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II’, American Political Science Review 77:2 (June 1983) pp. 368–83;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. and Stephen Krasner, ‘Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics’, Comparative Politics 16:2 (January 1984) pp. 223–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Charles E. Merriam and Harold F. Gosnell, The American Party System (New York: Macmillan, 1933);

    Google Scholar 

  100. Elmer E. Schattschneider, Party Government (New York: Farrar and Rhinehart, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Samuel Huntington, American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Charles Beard, The Economic Basis of Politics (New York: Knopf, 1922);

    Google Scholar 

  103. Vernon Parrington, Main Currents in American Thought, 3 vols. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1927–30);

    Google Scholar 

  104. and Frederick Jackson Turner, The Frontier in American History (New York: Henry Holt, 1920).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Pendleton Herring, The Politics of Democracy (New York: Norton, 1940);

    Google Scholar 

  106. David Truman, The Governmental Process (New York: Knopf, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Charles E. Lindblom, Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books, 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  108. Robert A. Dahl, Dilemmas of Democratic Pluralism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Pendleton Herring, Public Administration and the Public Interest (New York: McGraw Hill, 1936); Presidential Leadership: The Political Relations of Congress and the Chief Executive (New York: Farrar and Rhinehart, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  110. V. O. Key, The Administration of Federal Grants in Aid to the States (Chicago, Ill.: Public Administration Services, 1937)

    Google Scholar 

  111. and David Truman, Administrative Decentralization (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Henry Ehrmann, ‘Interest Groups’, vol. XII, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: Macmillan, 1968) pp. 241ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  113. Gabriel A. Almond, ‘Corporatism, Pluralism, and Professional Memory’, World Politics 35:2 (January 1983) pp. 245–60;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Alfred Stepan, The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  115. and Phillippe Schmitter, Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  116. H. Gordon Skilling, ‘Interest Groups and Communist Politics’, World Politics 18:3 (April 1966) pp. 435–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. H. Gordon Skilling and Franklyn Griffiths (eds) Interest Groups in Soviet Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  118. William Odom, ‘A Dissenting View on the Group Approach to Soviet Politics’, World Politics 28:4 (July 1976) pp. 542–67;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. David Powell, ‘In Pursuit of Interest Groups in the USSR’, Soviet Union/Union Sovietique 6 (Part 1, 1979) pp. 99–124;

    Google Scholar 

  120. Andrew Janos, ‘Interest Groups and the Structure of Power: Critiques and Comparisons’, Studies in Comparative Communism 12:1 (Spring 1979) pp. 6–20; and Andrew Janos, ‘Group Politics in Communist Society: A Second Look at the Pluralistic Model’, in Huntington and Moore, Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society, pp. 437–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Joseph La Palombara, ‘Monoliths or Plural Systems: Through Conceptual Lenses Darkly’, Studies in Comparative Communism 8:3 (Autumn, 1975) pp. 305–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. H. Gordon Skilling, ‘Interest Groups and Communist Politics Revisited’, World Politics 36:1 (October 1983) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Joel Schwartz and William Keech, ‘Group Influence and the Policy Process in the Soviet Union’, American Political Science Review 62:3 (September 1968) pp. 840–51;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Philip D. Stewart, ‘Soviet Interest Groups and the Policy Process: The Repeal of Production Education’, World Politics 22:1 (October 1969) pp. 29–51;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Peter Solomon, Soviet Criminologists and Criminal Policy: Specialists in Policy Making (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  126. Thane Gustafson, Reform in Soviet Politics; Lessons of Recent Policies on Land and Water (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  127. Michel Oksenberg, ‘Occupational Groups in Chinese Society and the Cultural Revolution’, Chinese Studies 2 (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, Center for Chinese Studies, 1968); Alan Liu, Communication and National Integration in China (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  128. and J. Esmein, The Chinese Cultural Revolution (London: Deutsch, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Merle Goldman, China’s Intellectuals: Advise and Dissent (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981);

    Google Scholar 

  130. Lucian W. Pye, Dynamics of Chinese Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  131. David S. Goodman (ed.) Groups and Politics in the People’s Republic of China (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Jan Triska and Charles Gati (eds) Blue Collar Workers in Eastern Europe (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Zvi Gitelman and Walter Connor (eds), Public Opinion in European Socialist Systems (New York: Praeger, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Archie Brown, ‘Pluralism, Power and the Soviet Political System: A Comparative Perspective’, in Susan Gross Solomon (ed.) Pluralism in the Soviet Union (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1983) pp. 61–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  135. G. D. H. Cole, Guild Socialism (London: Fabian Society, 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Stein Rokkan, ‘Geography, Religion, and Social Class: Crosscutting Cleavages in Norwegian Politics’, in Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan, Party Systems and Voter Alignments (New York: Free Press, 1967);

    Google Scholar 

  137. Robert Kvavik, Interest Groups in Norwegian Politics (Oslo: Universitets forlaget, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Phillippe Schmitter, ‘Still the Century of Corporatism’, in Phillippe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch, Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1974) p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  139. David Cameron, ‘Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labor Quiescence, and the Representation of Economic Interests in Advanced Capitalist Societies’, in David Goldthorpe (ed.) Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Peter Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985). See also Harold M. Wilensky, ‘Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development’, in Flora and Heidenheimer, The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America;

    Google Scholar 

  141. and Phillippe Schmitter, ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Western Europe and North America’, in Suzanne Berger (ed.) Organizing Interests in Western Europe (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  142. Valerie Bunce and John M. Echols, ‘Soviet Politics in the Brezhnev Era: Pluralism or Corporatism’, in Donald R. Kelley, Soviet Politics in the Brezhnev Era (New York: Viking, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  143. Valerie Bunce, ‘The Political Economy of the Brezhnev Era’, British Journal of Political Science 13:2 (April 1983) p. 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Archie Brown, ‘Political Power in the Soviet State’, in Neil Harding (ed.) The State in Society (Albany, NY: State University Press of New York Press, 1984); Phillippe Schmitter, ‘Still the Century of Corporatism’, in Schmitter and Lehmbruch, Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, pp. 99–100;

    Google Scholar 

  145. Juan J. Linz, ‘Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes’, in Greenstein and Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3 (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1975) p. 312;

    Google Scholar 

  146. and Alfred Stepan, The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Robert A. Dahl, Who Governs (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Theodore Lowi, ‘American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory’, World Politics 16:4 (July 1964) pp. 677–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. J. Leiper Freeman. The Political Process (New York: Random House, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  150. Hugh Heclo, ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’, in Anthony King (ed.) The New American Political System (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978) pp. 87–124.

    Google Scholar 

  151. John W. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  152. William Zimmerman, ‘Issue Area and Foreign-Policy Process: A Research Note in Search of a General Theory’, American Political Science Review 67:4 (December 1973) pp. 1204–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Nina Halpern, ‘Economic Specialists and the Making of Chinese Economic Policy, 1955–1981’, PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  154. John W. Lewis, Political Networks and the Chinese Policy Process (Stanford, Calif.: Northeast Asia Forum on International Policy, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  155. John Lowenhardt, Decision Making in Soviet Politics (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  156. Alfred Meyer, The Soviet Political System: An Interpretation (New York: Random House, 1965) p. 468.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Allen Kassof, ‘The Administered Society: Totalitarianism Without Terror’, World Politics 16:4 (July 1964) pp. 558–75;,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. T. H. Rigby, ‘Traditional, Market, and Organization Societies’, World Politics 16:4 (July 1964) pp. 539–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. John A. Armstrong, ‘Sources of Administrative Behavior: Some Soviet and Western European Comparisons’, American Political Science Review 59:3 (September 1965) pp. 643–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Jerry Hough, The Soviet Union and Social Science Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  161. Barghoorn, Politics in the USSR (1972) p. 202;

    Google Scholar 

  162. see also Barghoorn and Remington, Politics in the USSR (1986) pp. 403–404.

    Google Scholar 

  163. David Granick, Management of the Industrial Firm in the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1954);

    Google Scholar 

  164. Joseph Berliner, Factory and Manager in the USSR (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  165. and Jeremy Azrael, Managerial Power and Soviet Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  166. Arnold Horelick, A. Ross Johnson and John D. Steinbruner, The Study of Soviet Foreign Policy: Decision Theory Related Approaches (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  167. William Potter, ‘Sources of Foreign Policy Change: Insights from the Policy Sciences’, Conference on the Domestic Sources of Soviet Foreign Policy, UCLA Project on Politics and War, 11 Oct. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Jiri Valenta, ‘Soviet Decisionmaking and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968’, Studies in Comparative Communism 8:1 and 2 (Spring–Summer 1975) pp. 147–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Gail Lapidus, ‘The Making of Russia’s China Policy: Domestic/ Foreign Policy Linkages in Sino-Soviet Relations’, UCLA Project on Politics and War, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Michel Oksenberg, ‘Methods of Communication Within the Chinese Bureaucracy’, China Quarterly 57 (January–March 1974) pp. 1–39;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Michel Oksenberg, ‘Economic Policy Making in China: Summer 1981’, China Quarterly 90 (September 1982) pp. 165–94;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Kenneth Lieberthal, Central Documents and Politburo Politics in China (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Chinese Studies, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  173. Robert Conquest, Power and Policy in the USSR (London: Macmillan, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  174. James C. Scott, ‘Political Clientelism: A Bibliographical Essay’, in Steffen Schmidt, et al., Friends, Followers, and Factions (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  175. Carl Lande, Leaders, Factions and Parties: The Structure of Phillippine Politics 6 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale Southeast Asia Monograph Series, 1965); Schmidt, et al., Friends, Followers, and Factions, Introduction, pp. 75–100 and pp. 506–10;

    Google Scholar 

  176. James C. Scott, ‘Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change’, American Political Science Review 63:4 (December 1969) pp. 1142–58 and ‘Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia’, American Political Science Review 66:1 (March 1972) pp. 91–113;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. René Lemarchand and Keith Legg, ‘Political Clientism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis’, Comparative Politics 4:2 (January 1972) pp. 149–78;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. and S. Eisenstadt and René Lemarchand, Political Clientelism, Patronage, and Development (Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  179. Andrew Nathan, ‘A Factionalism Model for CCP Politics’, China Quarterly 53 (January–March 1973) pp. 34–66.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Nathan Leites, On the Game of Politics in France (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  181. John W. Lewis, Political Networks and the Chinese Policy Process (Stanford, Calif.: Northeast Asia Forum on International Policy, 1986) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Lucian W. Pye, Asian Power and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, 1985) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  183. John Willerton, ‘Clientelism in the Soviet Union: An Initial Examination’, Studies in Comparative Communism 12:1 and 2 (Summer–Autumn, 1979) pp. 159–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. T. H. Rigby and Bohdan Harasymiw, Leadership Selection and Patron-Client Relations in the USSR and Yugoslavia (London: Allen & Unwin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  185. Erik P. Hoffmann, ‘Methodological Problems of Kremlinology’, in Frederic J. Fleron, Jr. (ed.) Communist Studies and the Social Sciences: Essays on Methodology and Empirical Theory (Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  186. Ellen Mickiewicz, ‘Managing Public Opinion and International News in the Soviet Union’, in Domestic Sources of Foreign and Defense Policy, UCLA Project on Politics and War, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Cf. Alex Inkeles, Public Opinion in Soviet Russia (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  188. Robert Packenham, ‘The Changing Political Discourse in Brazil’, in Wayne Selcher (ed.) Political Liberalization in Brazil (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  189. Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  190. Adam Przeworski and James Teune, The Logic of Comparative Social Inqiry (New York: John Wiley, 1970) p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  191. Albert Hirschman, ‘The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding’, World Politics 22:3 (April 1970) pp. 329–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. John Womack, Zapata and the Mexican Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1968);

    Google Scholar 

  193. James Payne, Patterns of Conflict in Colombia (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  194. Harry Eckstein, ‘Case Study and Theory in Political Science’, in Greenstein and Polsby, Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3 (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  195. Roberto Michels, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: Hearst International Library, 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  196. Ronald Amann, ‘Searching for an Appropriate Concept of Soviet Politics: The Politics of Hesitant Modernization?’, British Journal of Political Science 16:4 (October 1986) pp. 475–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. Alexander Dallin, ‘The Domestic Sources of Soviet Foreign Policy’, in Seweryn Bialer, The Domestic Context of Soviet Foreign Policy (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1981) p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Thomas F. Remington

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almond, G.A., Roselle, L. (1989). Model Fitting in Communism Studies. In: Remington, T.F. (eds) Politics and the Soviet System. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09820-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics