Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Military and Strategic History ((SMSH))

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

By spring 1922 Lloyd George was in decline, for even if Austen Chamberlain remained loyal to him, many ministers and sections of the Conservative Party were no longer. These determinants shaped Lloyd George’s strategic decisions. So as to overcome the controversy surrounding the Geddes Committee’s recommendations, he had to establish Cabinet committees to examine its civil and armed service proposals. He made Churchill the chairman of the committee (including Montagu, Lord Birkenhead and Baldwin) to examine the service ones. Although the Geddes Committee’s proposals were politically vital to Lloyd George, he had to give colleagues of questionable loyalty the power to challenge its recommendations. When Britain reached its decision on these matters, Lloyd George confronted another political danger, for his advisors warned him that should Churchill resign over Anglo-Soviet negotiations at the Genoa Conference, he would gain much die-hard Conservative support. Given Churchill’s ties with some Asquithian Liberals and Cecilite Conservatives, he might even focus every Parliamentary faction which opposed Lloyd George and thus threaten the Coalition. Although Churchill probably had no such intention, he was ready to work with the opposition to defend the RAF had the Cabinet rejected his views on that question.1 In any case Lloyd George could not trust Churchill but equally dared not antagonise him needlessly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 The New Strategic Policy of 1922

  1. War Office to India Office, 23 November 1920, passim, L/MIL 7/5465; War Office to India Office, 28 April 1920, L/MIL 7/5474; Keith Jeffery, `An English Barrack in the Orient Seas? India in the Aftermath of the First World War’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 15 (1981); CP 3701, CAB 24 /133.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Walder, The Chanak Affair (1969), although flawed, is the best account of the crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Lloyd George, The Truth About the Peace Treaties, Volume 2 (1938) pp. 1349–50;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winston S. Churchill, The World Crisis: Volume 5, The Aftermath, 1918–1928 (1929) pp. 419–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lord Beaverbrook, The Decline and Fall of Lloyd George (1963) p. 162; Clarke, Innings p. 229; Curzon to Hardinge, 10 October 1922, Hardinge papers, vol. 45; minute by Hankey, 4 November 1927, CAB 21/334.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conference of ministers, 18 September 1922, CAB 23/39; minute by Orde, 15 February 1923, FO 371/9418; memorandum by Hankey, 4 November 1927, CAB 21/334; John Ferris `Whitehall’s Black Chamber: British Cryptology and the Government Code and Cypher School, 1919–29’, Intelligence and National Security, vol. 2 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 John Robert Ferris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferris, J.R. (1989). The New Strategic Policy of 1922. In: The Evolution of British Strategic Policy, 1919–26. Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09739-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09739-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09741-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09739-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics