Abstract
After the armistice Britain wanted to dominate the Middle East, maintain its maritime security and establish a new balance of power in Europe and the Pacific. In the belief that Britain would continue to be secure and achieve its diplomatic aims during the foreseeable future, the government formulated its strategic policy of 1919. When these assumptions proved unrealistic, strategic policy had to be altered. Even in the best circumstances Britain would have had to curb some of its ambitions in order to secure the remainder through an accommodation with other powers. The need for such alterations arose when unexpected events, like the US withdrawal into isolationism, hampered British policy. Since the government overestimated the strength of its diplomatic position, however, it declined the compromises needed to accommodate other states. Consequently Britain found it increasingly difficult to further its foreign policy and came to believe that other nations were challenging its vital interests, while the balance of power which Britain had hoped would underwrite its security did not emerge. The prospect of strategic cooperation with the United States receded, which caused Britain to reconsider the wisdom of its commitments to France and Japan. Simultaneously, statesmen came to think that many nations, especially a coalition centred on Russia, could threaten Britain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
6 Strategic Policy and Diplomacy, 1919–22
Ian Nish, Alliance in Decline, A Study in Anglo-Japanese Relations, 1908–24 (1974) pp. 295–96.
Roskill, Naval Policy pp. 218–29; Neidpath, Singapore pp. 45–6; Nish, Alliance pp. 319–32; J. Kenneth MacDonald, British Naval Policy in the Pacific and Far East: From Paris to Washington, 1919–1922 University of Oxford Ph.D. thesis (1975).
Barnett, Collapse pp. 258–63; Hosaya Chihiro, ‘Britain and the United States in Japan’s view of the international system, 1919–37’ in Ian Nish (ed.), Anglo-Japanese Alienation, 1919–1952 (1982).
Sixth Imperial Conference meeting, 24 June 1921, CAB 32/2; Cabinet meeting, 30 June 1921, CAB 23/26; M.G. Fry, ‘The North Atlantic Triangle and the Abrogation of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance’, Journal of Modern History, vol. 39 (1967).
Antony Preston, Cruisers, An Illustrated History, 1880–1980 (1980) pp. 74–5, 83.
M.L. Dockrill and Douglas Goold, Peace Without Promise: Britain and the Peace Conferences, 1919–23 (1981) passim; Schroeder, ‘Tradition’.
CP 117, CAB 24/93; Cabinet meetings, 26 November and 2 December 1919, CAB 23/18; Sally Marks, Innocent Abroad, Belgium at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 (1981) pp. 286–97; Roskill, Hankey pp. 133–34.
CP 919, CAB 24/102; CP 1782, CAB 24/110; CID papers no. 240-B, passim, CAB 4/7; Cabinet meeting, 30 June 1920, CAB 23/21; Keith Middlemass (ed.), Thomas Jones, Whitehall Diary, Volume I (1969) pp. 115–17; Marks, Innocent pp. 300–01.
Hines H. Hall III, ‘British Air Defence and Anglo-French Relations, 1921–1924’, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 4 (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 John Robert Ferris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferris, J.R. (1989). Strategic Policy and Diplomacy, 1919–22. In: The Evolution of British Strategic Policy, 1919–26. Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09739-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09739-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09741-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09739-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)