Skip to main content

Conflict and Resolution

  • Chapter
Theater and Incarnation
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

We have spoken of the theatre’s affirmation or distrust of human time and space; of its willingness to celebrate both rough and holy or its fastidious determination to create a play world more decorous than God’s; and of its capacity to imitate and its temptation to summon the unseen. And we have suggested that the degree to which a play embraces one or other of these variables reveals in great measure its evaluative stance towards the world outside performance. A final and perhaps most important index of a play’s stance has to do with its assessment of conflict and resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Grotowski, quoted in B. E. Clarke, ‘Grotowski Speaks Again’, Theater (Spring 1982) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Grotowski, Towards a Poor Theatre (New York: Touchstone, 1968) p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Findlay, ‘Grotowski’s Akropolos. A Retrospective View’, Modern Drama 27 (March 1984) pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grotowski, quoted in E. Barba and L. Flaszen, ‘A Theatre of Magic and Sacrilege’, Tulane Drama Review, Vol. 9, no. 3 (Spring 1965) p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grotowski, quoted in Z. Osiński, Grotowski and his Laboratory, trans. L. Vallee and R. Findlay (New York: PAJ Publications, 1986) p. 171; cf. p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grotowski, ‘Holiday: The Day That Is Holy’, The Drama Review, vol. 17, no. 2 (June 1973) p. 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Croyden, ‘New theater rule: no watching allowed’, Vogue (December 1975) pp. 196–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Mennen, ‘Jerzy Grotowski’s Paratheatrical Projects’, The Drama Review, Vol. 19, no. 4 (December 1975) pp. 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grotowski, ‘Tu es le fils de quelqu’un’, The Drama Review, vol. 31, no. 3 (Autumn 1987) pp. 32–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Grimes, ‘The Theatre of Sources’, The Drama Review (Autumn 1981) p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Vogel, ‘Der lachende Barth’, in Antwort: Karl Barth zum Siebzigsten Geburtstag am 10 Mai 1956, ed. E. Wolf, C. von Kirschbaum and R. Frey (Zollikon-Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1956) pp. 64–171;

    Google Scholar 

  12. cited in B. Ramm, After Fundamentalism (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1983) p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Julian of Norwich, Revelations of Divine Love, ch. 27, ed. G. Warwick (London: Methuen, 1901) p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Max Harris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, M. (1990). Conflict and Resolution. In: Theater and Incarnation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09697-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics